Summary
For heavy oils with viscosities ranging from 1000 to 10 000 mPa.s in western
Canada, primary production and waterflood together can recover only 8-15% of
original oil in place (OOIP) at their economic limits because of the adverse
mobility ratio, severe water channeling, low reservoir pressure, and formation
voidage. These heavy oils usually have a relatively high content of acids that
can react with alkalis to form in-situ surfactants. The loosely consolidated
sandstone formations in which these oils are deposited are characterized by
high porosity, high permeability, and low reservoir temperature. These
reservoir conditions are favorable for polymer application. Therefore, there is
a potential to improve waterflood in these reservoirs by applying
alkaline/polymer (A/P) flooding.
This paper presents the results of a laboratory study of A/P flooding for
heavy-oil recovery, including viscosity measurements, flood tests conducted in
channeled sandpacks, residual-resistance-factor (FRR) determination,
and residual-oil-distribution tests. A heavy oil with a viscosity of 1,202 cp
and an acid number of 1.07 (mg of KOH/g of oil) and produced brine collected
from a heavy-oil reservoir in Alberta are used in this study. We found that the
distribution of the injected chemical solution within the high-permeability
channels leads to the diversion of the subsequently injected chemical solution
to low-permeability zones with higher oil saturation because of the formation
of blockage in the channel zones. Consequently, pressure buildup during
chemical-slug injection is the key to the improvement of displacement
efficiency. Flood tests also show that A/P flooding is more efficient than
either alkaline flooding or polymer flooding. The optimal formulation for the
heavy oil used in this study is 0.4% NaOH + 0.2% Na2CO3 +
1000 mg/L polymer, with a tertiary oil recovery of 25-30% of OOIP above that
from waterflooding. Analysis of the results of the residual-oil distributions
in the channeled sandpacks at the end of A/P flooding show that A/P flooding
can effectively improve the sweep efficiency of waterflooding for the heavy
oil.
© 2011. Society of Petroleum Engineers
View full textPDF
(
908 KB
)
History
- Original manuscript received:
18 August 2010
- Meeting paper published:
20 October 2010
- Revised manuscript received:
13 December 2010
- Manuscript approved:
5 February 2011
- Published online:
16 May 2011
- Version of record:
7 June 2011