SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
Volume 14,
Number 6,
December 2011,
pp. 726-734
Summary
For hydrophobically associative polymers, incorporating a small fraction of
hydrophobic monomer into a hydrolyzed polyacrylamide (HPAM) polymer can promote
intermolecular associations and thereby enhance viscosities and resistance
factors. In this paper, we investigate the behavior of a new associative
polymer in porous media. The tetra-polymer has low hydrophobic-monomer content
and a molecular weight (Mw) of 12-17 million g/mol. Total anionic content is
15-25 mol%, including a few percent of a sulfonic monomer. This polymer is
compared with a conventional HPAM with 18-20 million g/mol Mw and 35-40%
anionic content. Rheological properties (viscosity vs. concentration; and shear
rate and elastic and loss moduli vs. frequency) were similar for the two
polymers [in a 2.52% total dissolved solids (TDS) brine at 25°C]. For both
polymers in cores with permeabilities from 300 to 13,000 md, no face plugging
or internal-filter-cake formation was observed, and resistance factors
correlated well using the capillary-bundle parameter. For the HPAM polymer in
these cores, low-flux resistance factors were consistent with low-shear-rate
viscosities. In contrast, over the same permeability range, the associative
polymer provided low-flux resistance factors that were two to three times the
values expected from viscosities. Moderate shear degradation did not eliminate
this effect--nor did flow through a few feet of porous rock. Propagation
experiments in long cores (up to 157 cm) suggest that the unexpectedly high
resistance factors could propagate deep into a reservoir--thereby providing
enhanced displacement compared with conventional HPAM polymers. Compared with
HPAM, the new polymer shows a significantly higher level of shear thinning at
low fluxes and a lower degree of shear thickening at high fluxes.
© 2011. Society of Petroleum Engineers
View full textPDF
(
1,683 KB
)
History
- Original manuscript received:
26 January 2011
- Meeting paper published:
11 April 2011
- Revised manuscript received:
18 April 2011
- Manuscript approved:
2 June 2011
- Published online:
9 November 2011
- Version of record:
28 December 2011