SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
Volume 15,
Number 1,
February 2012,
pp. 41-50
Summary
Reserves estimation in an unconventional-reservoir setting is a daunting
task because of geologic uncertainty and complex flow patterns evolving in a
long, stimulated horizontal well, among other variables. To tackle this complex
problem, we present a reserves-evaluation workflow that couples the traditional
decline-curve analysis (DCA) with a probabilistic forecasting frame. The
stretched-exponential production-decline (SEPD) model underpins the production
behavior. Our recovery appraisal workflow has two different applications:
forecasting probabilistic future performance of (1) wells that have production
history and of (2) new wells without production data. For the new-field case,
numerical-model runs are made in accord with the statistical design of
experiments (DOE) for a range of design variables pertinent to the field of
interest. In contrast, for the producing wells, the early-time data often need
adjustments owing to restimulation, installation of artificial lift, or other
factors to focus on the decline trend. Thereafter, production data of either
new or existing wells are grouped in accordance with maximum rates to obtain
common SEPD model parameters for similar wells. After determining the
distribution of model parameters using the well-grouping approach, the method
establishes a probabilistic forecast for the individual wells.
This paper presents a probabilistic performance-forecasting method in
unconventional reservoirs for wells with and without production history. Unlike
other probabilistic forecasting tools, grouping wells with similar production
character allows estimation of self-consistent SEPD-model parameters and
alleviates the burden of having to define uncertainties associated with
reservoir and well-completion parameters.
© 2012. Society of Petroleum Engineers
View full textPDF
(
2,754 KB
)
History
- Original manuscript received:
7 March 2011
- Meeting paper published:
14 June 2011
- Revised manuscript received:
15 September 2011
- Manuscript approved:
1 November 2011
- Published online:
9 February 2012
- Version of record:
29 February 2012