SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
Volume 15, Number 3, June 2012, pp. 361-369

SPE-145764-PA

Integrating Mini-DST-Derived Permeability With Other Sources: A Case Study

View full textPDF ( 3,827 KB )

DOI  More information 10.2118/145764-PA http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/145764-PA

Citation

  • Harmawan, I., Kabir, C.S., Habib, S. et al. 2012. Integrating Mini-DST-Derived Permeability With Other Sources: A Case Study. SPE Res Eval & Eng  15 (3): 361-369. SPE-145764-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/145764-PA.

Discipline Categories

  • 6.6 Reservoir Monitoring/Formation Evaluation
  • 6.6.11 Formation Testing (e.g., Wireline, LWD)
  • 6.6.2 Core Analysis
  • 6.6.1 Well Logging
  • 6.6.9 Special Core Analysis

Keywords

  • mini-DST with formation testers, integration of permeability from different sources

Summary

Permeability is the cornerstone of any reservoir-flow modeling that leads to field development and production management. Typical sources of permeability include cores, logs, wireline formation tests [or minidrillstem tests (mini-DSTs)], and conventional DSTs. However, integrating various sources of permeability at different scales is problematic. Anchored in mini-DST-derived permeability, this study endeavors to integrate various sources of permeability, leading to reservoir description in a turbidite sandstone reservoir in the Sabah basin, Malaysia.

Pressure-transient-test data recorded during a mini-DST operation differed significantly from data gathered during a conventional DST. Even though test quality was excellent, interpretation challenges were numerous in this well. Consequently, multidisciplinary information was brought to bear for integration of data derived from mini-DSTs. Other sources of information included sidewall cores, spot pressure measurements, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), and microelectrical imaging logs. This case study demonstrates that, in this particular setting, the use of mini-DSTs was cost-effective and yielded the subsurface information required to plan field-development options.

View full textPDF ( 3,827 KB )

History

  • Original manuscript received: 22 June 2011
  • Meeting paper published: 21 September 2011
  • Revised manuscript received: 19 November 2011
  • Manuscript approved: 14 February 2012
  • Published online: 10 May 2012
  • Version of record: 12 June 2012