SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
Volume 15, Number 5, October 2012, pp. 571-583

SPE-146049-PA

Estimating Drainage-Area Pressure With Flow-After-Flow Testing

View full textPDF ( 1,730 KB )

DOI  More information 10.2118/146049-PA http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/146049-PA

Citation

  • Kabir, C.S., Elgmati, M., and Reza, Z. 2012. Estimating Drainage-Area Pressure With Flow-After-Flow Testing. SPE Res Eval & Eng 15 (5): 571-583. SPE-146049-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/146049-PA.

Summary

Estimating the average drainage-area pressure (pav) of individual wells is a cornerstone to any reservoir-management practice. Yet conventional methods do not always offer reliable solutions to this vexing problem. This study shows that transient flow-after-flow (FAF) testing offers an excellent opportunity to establish pav in a time-lapse mode, when conducted following operational shutdowns. Instrumented wells are natural candidates for FAF testing.

Real-time surveillance offers the opportunity to perform rate-transient analysis that results in drainage volume and, consequently, pav. However, gathering quality rate data commensurate with pressure over a long producing period is fraught with uncertainty, which raises questions about the validity of the pav so obtained. In addition, continuous changes in drainage-boundary conditions pose modeling challenges with a given reservoir model. Therefore, the independent estimation of pav cannot be overemphasized. This paper presents a theroretical framework for transient FAF testing and also shows a pragmatic approach to handling pressure/rate data incoherence.

View full textPDF ( 1,730 KB )

History

  • Original manuscript received: 21 June 2011
  • Meeting paper published: 31 October 2011
  • Revised manuscript received: 7 June 2012
  • Manuscript approved: 10 July 2012
  • Published online: 11 September 2012
  • Version of record: 30 October 2012