SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
Volume 15,
Number 6,
December 2012,
pp. 712-724
Summary
Oil and water production data are regularly measured in oilfield operations
and vary from well to well and change with time. Theoretical models are often
used to establish the production expectation for different recovery processes.
A performance surveillance understanding can be developed by comparing the
field production data with the production expectation. This comparison
generates quantitative or qualitative signals to determine whether the producer
meets production expectations or the producer is underperforming and
appropriate operational action is required to address the underperformance. The
case study is for the South Belridge diatomite in California. This
hydraulically fractured diatomite reservoir is currently under waterflood and
steamflood. A methodology is proposed to establish the production expectation
from historical production data. For primary depletion, the formation linear
and bilinear flow models are applied to producers with vertical hydraulic
fractures. For waterflood, an analytical method derived from the
Buckley-Leverett displacement theory is used. Those analytical methods can
predict production and provide surveillance signals for producers in the
primary and waterflood recovery stages. For steamflood, a semiquantitative
performance/surveillance criterion is proposed on the basis of understanding
the mechanistic oil banking concept and reservoir simulation results for
steamflood and waterflood. With those models representing expected production
performance, an integrated flow regime diagram is proposed for production
surveillance. A performance expectation can be developed for an individual
producer. A significant overperformance relative to the expectation normally
indicates changes in the recovery mechanism or improvement in sweep efficiency.
A significant underperformance usually signifies an operational issue that
requires correction to optimize the production performance. In the case study,
the surveillance methodology for producers under primary depletion, waterflood,
or steamflood is demonstrated by use of historical production data. In
addition, water channeling between injectors and producers and its impact on
production performance are discussed. On the basis of this surveillance
methodology, some operational actions were proposed, and successful results are
demonstrated. Examples of forecast for an individual producer in the primary
depletion stage and field scale prediction in the waterflood stage are
provided. Application indicates that the proposed methodology can serve as a
convenient and practical tool for reservoir surveillance and operational
optimization.
© 2012. Society of Petroleum Engineers
View full textPDF
(
1,640 KB
)
History
- Original manuscript received:
2 May 2012
- Meeting paper published:
19 April 2012
- Revised manuscript received:
9 July 2012
- Manuscript approved:
3 September 2012
- Published online:
6 December 2012
- Version of record:
28 December 2012