Summary
Questions arise whether bottomhole pressures (BHPs), derived from their
wellhead counterpart (WHP), lend themselves to transient analysis. That is
because considerable heat exchange may affect the wellbore-density profile,
thereby making the WHP translation a nontrivial exercise. In other words, gas
density is dependent on both spatial locations in the wellbore and time during
transient testing. Fully coupled wellbore/reservoir simulators are available to
tackle this situation. However, they are not readily adaptable for their
numeric formulations.
This paper presents analytic expressions, derived from first principles, for
computing time-dependent fluid temperature at any point in the wellbore during
both drawdown and buildup testing. The simplicity of the analytic expressions
for Tf (z, t) is profound in that one can compute flowing or shut-in BHPs on a
spreadsheet.
Two tests were considered to verify the new analytic formulae. In one case,
measurements were available at both sandface and surface, and partial wellhead
information was available in the other case. We explored a parametric study to
assess whether a given wellbore/reservoir system will lend itself to wellhead
measurements for valid transient analysis. Reservoir flow capacity (kh) turned
out to be the most influential variable.
Introduction
Gas-well testing is sometimes conducted by measuring pressures at the
wellhead. Both cost and circumstance (high pressure/high temperature, or HP/HT)
often necessitate WHP monitoring or running the risk of having no tests at all.
Methods for computing BHP from wellhead pressures for steady flow in gas wells
are well established in the literature. For dry-gas wells, the widely used
method of Cullender and Smith is most accurate, as confirmed by subsequent
studies. For wet gas, either a two-phase model, such as the one offered by
Govier and Fogarasi, or the modified Cullender-Smith approach appears
satisfactory.
However, these methods apply to steady-state gas flow and implicitly
presuppose that the wellbore is in thermal equilibrium with the formation.
These assumptions may be tested during a transient test. That is because
unsteady-state wellbore heat transfer occurs even after the cessation of the
wellbore-fluid-storage period. Steady-state fluid flow ordinarily implies the
absence of wellbore effects from the viewpoint of transient testing.
Consequently, one needs to develop working equations by conserving mass,
momentum, and energy in the wellbore to capture physical phenomena. Earlier, we
presented a forward model and showed its capability to reproduce BHP, WHP, and
wellhead temperature (WHT) given reservoir and wellbore parameters. However,
translation of WHP to BHP was not demonstrated clearly.
The intent of this work is to present a framework for rigorous computation
of BHP from WHP. To achieve this objective, we developed analytic expressions
for depth- and time-dependent fluid temperature during both flow and shut-in
tests. These temperature relations, in turn, allow computation of gas density
and, therefore, pressure at any point in the wellbore.
© 2005. Society of Petroleum Engineers
View full textPDF
(
881 KB
)
History
- Original manuscript received:
7 April 2004
- Revised manuscript received:
9 February 2005
- Manuscript approved:
14 February 2005
- Version of record:
15 June 2005
View Cart
