SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
Volume 9, Number 1, February 2006, pp. 24-31

SPE-90690-PA

A New Formation-Evaluation Technique for the Lower Tertiary in South Texas--Predicting Production in Low-Permeability, Fine-Grained Sandstones

View full textPDF ( 3,945 KB )

DOI  More information 10.2118/90690-PA http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/90690-PA

Citation

  • Rasmus, J.C., Horkowitz, J.P., Chabernaud, T., Graham, P., Summers, M., and Wise, D. 2006. A New Formation-Evaluation Technique for the Lower Tertiary in South Texas--Predicting Production in Low-Permeability, Fine-Grained Sandstones. SPE Res Eval & Eng9 (1): 24-31. SPE-90690-PA.

Summary

The lower Tertiary Wilcox, Yegua, and Vicksburg formations are prolific natural gas plays in south Texas that have been extensively drilled and produced from low-permeability, fine-grained sandstones. It is not unusual to encounter several potential pay zones in each well. What is lacking is a proven formation-evaluation method to determine the highest-productivity water-free producing zones from multiple intervals that can be casually identified on the logs as hydrocarbon-bearing. Connate-water resistivity (Rw) determination is not a major problem, given that many water-bearing sands are usually present. Accurately estimating true clay content, porosity, irreducible water volumes, and permeability present the greatest challenges.

A new spectroscopy-based petrophysical interpretation methodology has been developed that makes use of several unique measurements, namely quantitative elemental concentrations and lithology logs obtained from capture gamma ray spectroscopy devices in open or cased wells. These measurements allow us to more accurately define the clay content, mineralogy, and matrix properties of each potential zone. One significant finding obtained from these measurements is the occurrence of calcite cements detected in many sands that cause a pessimistic density porosity to be computed if not accounted for. This calcite cementation appears to vary dramatically in a lateral sense, indicating that its presence should not be used to condemn an entire layer as being too tight for production, nor provide irrefutable evidence of the expected ability of the layer to contain a hydraulic fracture.

The enhanced elemental and mineralogical analyses provided by the spectroscopy measurements also allow for more accurate bulk volume irreducible water calculations and a means to correct the neutron porosity for clay and matrix effects. By comparing irreducible water volume to bulk volume hydrocarbon, an accurate prediction of water production can be determined. Oil- and gas-bearing intervals can be identified easily from crossover of the matrix-corrected neutron porosity when used in conjunction with the matrix-corrected density porosity. Results are illustrated with several case studies from wells recently drilled and now producing from the Wilcox, Yegua, and Vicksburg formations.

Introduction

Formation evaluation in the south Texas Wilcox, Yegua, and Vicksburg sands is problematic because of the influence of the varying clay volume, average grain size, and hydrocarbon type on the logging measurements. In these south Texas shaly sands, the volume of clay minerals traditionally has been approximated from gamma ray (HSGR), spontaneous potential (SP), or density-neutron logs. Each of these methods has serious limitations. For example, if nonclay sources of radioactivity are present, estimates of clay volume from gamma ray will be too high, resulting in reduced estimates of effective porosity, pessimistic reserve calculations, and an overall reduction in the valuation of the reservoir’s potential. The clay volume also has an adverse affect on the ability to locate gas zones using the neutron-density crossover technique. The crossover is suppressed in gas zones in proportion to the amount of clay present. The presence of mud-filtrate invasion will also suppress the neutron-density crossover in gas zones.

View full textPDF ( 3,945 KB )

History

  • Original manuscript received: 16 September 2004
  • Meeting paper published: 7 November 2004
  • Revised manuscript received: 7 September 2005
  • Manuscript approved: 12 September 2005
  • Version of record: 20 February 2006