SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
Volume 10, Number 5, October 2007, pp. 508-513

SPE-90713-PA

Important Modeling Parameters for Predicting Steamflood Performance

View full textPDF ( 1,729 KB )

DOI  More information 10.2118/90713-PA http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/90713-PA

Citation

  • Satik, C., Kumar, M., DeFrancisco, S., Hoang, V. and Basham, M. 2007. Important Modeling Parameters for Predicting Steamflood Performance. SPE Res Eval & Eng  10 (5): 508-513. SPE-90713-PA.

Discipline Categories

  • 6.5 Reservoir Simulation
  • 6.4.5 Thermal Methods (e.g.,Steamflood, Cyclic Steam, THAI, Combustion)
  • 6.5.1 Simulator Development
  • 6.3.1 Flow in Porous Media
  • 6.3.2 Multi-phase Flow

Summary

A comprehensive numerical modeling study was performed to investigate impact of pattern confinement on steamflood simulation results, using a three-phase and 3D thermal reservoir simulator. In addition, the effects of cyclic steaming of the producers, grid size, and other physical parameters were evaluated. Detailed multipattern, single-sand steamflood models were constructed using properties of a heavy-oil field in California. All models included an initial primary depletion zone of 6 ft within 60 ft of net pay. Up to twenty-five, 2.5-acre patterns were included in the study.

Results show that finely gridded models accurately capture near-vertical steam override and oil drainage by gravity with a near-horizontal steam/oil interface. High injection pressures observed in many prior simulations are primarily a result of confined reservoir models. Steam-zone pressures and temperatures are similar to those typically observed in the field, when the model is unconfined (i.e., the model area is greater than the pattern area), representing undeveloped portions of the field. Moreover, including cyclic steaming of producers accelerates the steam breakthrough time and lowers injection pressures. During the post-breakthrough steam-rate-reduction period, field-observed oil-production response is represented better when the influence of surrounding patterns is included. Production-rate decline is relatively small when injection rate is reduced only in the primary pattern(s); however, the decline rate increases if rate reduction is implemented in the entire field.

Introduction

Reservoir simulation is a tool used by engineers to design new field projects and to help manage existing ones. It is commonly used to evaluate or screen various operating strategies. When used properly, it is today’s most detailed and sophisticated tool in the oil and gas industry. However, as Coats (1969) emphasized, the level of sophistication and complexity included in simulation models must be consistent with the overall project objectives and reliability of the available input data.

The use of simulation in steamflooding projects has been somewhat limited in the past, mainly because of excessive computation-time requirements for modeling project areas large enough to represent actual field operations. Thermal simulations are typically more CPU-intensive in nature than typical black-oil simulations as they require the solution of energy-balance equations in addition to mass-balance equations. In the past, computing hardware capabilities were not adequate to run sufficiently large thermal models. Consequently, early thermal simulation studies had to be simple, and they included only small pattern-element models, which could not capture some actual field observations (Chu and Trimble 1975; Gomaa et al. 1977; Chu 1979, 1987; Ziegler 1987; Hong 1994). However, because of recent developments in computer hardware technology, faster CPUs became available. Use of faster CPUs combined with better numerical solvers, and advancements in parallel computing, resulted in significant improvements in the performance of thermal simulators, therefore enabling modeling of larger, multipattern project areas (Dehghani et al. 1995; Johnson et al. 1992; Kumar 1992; Williams et al. 2001).

View full textPDF ( 1,729 KB )

History

  • Original manuscript received: 16 June 2004
  • Meeting paper published: 26 September 2004
  • Revised manuscript received: 15 March 2007
  • Manuscript approved: 10 May 2007
  • Version of record: 20 October 2007