SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
Volume 10, Number 3, June 2007, pp. 302-311

SPE-93057-PA

Real-Time Downhole pH Measurement Using Optical Spectroscopy

View full textPDF ( 3,593 KB )

DOI  More information 10.2118/93057-PA http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/93057-PA

Citation

  • Raghuraman, B., O'Keefe, M., Eriksen, K.O., Tau, L.A., Vikane, O., Gustavson, G. and Indo, K.  2007. Real-Time Downhole pH Measurement Using Optical Spectroscopy. SPE Res Eval & Eng  10 (3): 302-311. SPE-93057-PA.

Discipline Categories

  • 5.5.2 Oilfield Water Analysis
  • 6.6.1 Well Logging
  • 6.2.2 Fluid Modeling, Equations of State
  • 4.5.3 Materials and Corrosion
  • 5.3.5 Scale, Sand, Corrosion, and Clay Migration Control

Summary

A new downhole pH sensor has been developed to provide an in-situ pH measurement of formation water at reservoir conditions, and results are presented for two wells in the Norwegian Sea. The measurement technique, for use with wireline formation-sampling tools, uses pH-sensitive dyes that change color according to the pH of the formation water. To make a real-time pH measurement, the dye is injected into the formation fluid being pumped through the tool flowline, and the relevant visible wavelengths in an optical detector are used to record the dye signal and calculate pH with 0.1-unit accuracy.

The pH of a formation fluid alters as the sample is brought to surface from the high-temperature and -pressure conditions downhole, owing to acid gases and salts coming out of solution and changes in water-chemistry equilibria. To obtain an accurate pH, the measurement must be made downhole at reservoir conditions. Unlike potentiometric methods in which fouling of electrode surfaces by oil and mud is a potential problem, the dye technique is robust because the dye is isolated from the formation fluid and is injected into the sample only when a measurement is made. The technique has been applied successfully to both oil-based and water-based drilling muds, with successful measurements even in mixed oil/water flows. Multiple measurements of pH at a single sampling station demonstrate that the method is robust and repeatable. These measurements have been compared with numerical simulations using a multiphase chemical-equilibrium model that uses laboratory analysis of collected water samples as input.

pH is a key parameter in water chemistry and is critical for corrosion and scale studies. Accurate downhole pH measurement allows a more-accurate selection of appropriate completion materials and more-effective planning for scale treatment and inhibition.

Introduction

The main objectives of formation-water sampling in exploration wells are to obtain information regarding the scaling and corrosion potential of the water and to establish the salinity of the water for petrophysical evaluation. Formation-water data can also give information about compartments and communication in the reservoir and, hence, can improve the ability to make the right decisions early in development planning. Later in the production cycle, formation-water data can be used to differentiate produced connate water from aquifer- or injection-water breakthrough.

Ideally, water samples from exploration wells should consist of representative, uncontaminated formation water, which can be difficult and costly to obtain. The quality of formation-water data is highly dependent on the sampling technique and the type of drilling mud used in the reservoir zone. Oil-based drilling muds will usually provide good-quality water samples because the mud filtrate is not miscible with water. Water-based-mud filtrate can contaminate water samples because the filtrate is miscible with formation water, and chemical reactions can alter the true composition.

Reservoir water samples are usually collected in open hole with a wireline formation-testing device equipped with a probe or packer module, pumpout module, and sample chambers. At the start of the sampling process, fluids flowing from the formation are largely contaminated with drilling-mud filtrate and are disposed of by pumping into the borehole in the “cleanup” phase. Optical fluid analyzers or resistivity sensors are typically used to monitor filtrate contamination in real time, and sample collection into sample chambers begins once specific criteria to ensure representative water-sample quality are satisfied. Tracers are sometimes added to drilling fluids to allow calculation of the residual filtrate contamination in collected samples by subsequent laboratory analysis.

Because of the lack of standard high-temperature/high-pressure laboratory analytical techniques for water analysis, collected water samples are first reconditioned to downhole temperature and pressure and then flashed to ambient conditions before laboratory analysis. The gas/water ratio (GWR) is measured, and the composition of the liberated gas is analyzed by gas chromatography. Ion composition, pH, and low-molecular-weight organic acids are analyzed in the water phase. The gas and water analysis and the GWR are entered into a multiphase equilibrium model to predict the downhole pH. These data then can be used to predict corrosion potential, scale potential, and hydrate-formation potential.

View full textPDF ( 3,593 KB )

History

  • Original manuscript received: 21 November 2005
  • Revised manuscript received: 26 September 2006
  • Manuscript approved: 20 March 2007
  • Version of record: 20 June 2007