SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
Volume 11, Number 1, February 2008, pp. 83-94

SPE-96021-PA

Measurement of Surfactant-Induced Interfacial Interactions at Reservoir Conditions

View full textPDF ( 2,735 KB )

DOI  More information 10.2118/96021-PA http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/96021-PA

Citation

  • Xu, W., Ayirala, S.C., and Rao, D.N. 2008. Measurement of Surfactant-Induced Interfacial Interactions at Reservoir Conditions. SPE Res Eval & Eng11 (1): 83-94. SPE-96021-PA.

Discipline Categories

  • 5.5.4 Rock/Fluid Interactions
  • 6.4.6 Chemical Flooding Methods Methods (e.g., Polymer, Solvent, Nitrogen, Immiscible CO2, Surfactant, Vapex)

Summary

The effect of surface-active chemicals on oil/water interfacial tension (IFT) and wettability in crude oil/brine-rock systems at reservoir conditions is important in enhanced oil recovery (EOR) processes. However, most of the experimental studies on IFT and contact angles have been conducted at ambient conditions and using stock tank crude oils. In this study, live, and stock-tank crude oils have been used at reservoir conditions to make IFT and dynamic contact angle measurements using the drop shape analysis (DSA) and dual-drop dual-crystal (DDDC) techniques, respectively. Yates reservoir rock and fluids, and two types of surfactants (nonionic and anionic) in varying concentrations have been used at reservoir conditions of 82°F and 700 psi (27.8°C and 4.8 MPa).

The dynamic oil/water IFT was found to be a strong function of oil composition, temperature, and showed a slight dependence on pressure. An attempt has been made to explain the dynamic behavior of IFT using a four stage mechanistic model involving induction, diffusion, kinetic barrier, and equilibrium stages. The significant difference observed between the advancing contact angles of live oil (55°) and stock-tank oil (154°) clearly indicates the need to use live oils at reservoir conditions to determine in-situ reservoir wettability. Anionic surfactant altered the weakly water-wet behavior of live oil to strongly oil-wet (165°). It was also able to alter the strong oil-wet behavior of stock tank oil to less oil-wet (<135°). The nonionic surfactant was able to alter the water-wet live oil system to intermediate-wet (82°), while it did not affect the strongly oil-wet behavior of stock tank oil system.

The oil-wet behavior observed for live oil using surfactants indicates the possibility that these surfactants develop continuous oil-wet paths for potential mixed wettability development. Thus, this study is of practical significance in cases where the surfactant-induced wettability alterations to either intermediate-wet or mixed-wet can result in improved oil recovery through the lowering of both capillary and adhesion forces.

Introduction

The addition of surfactants to the injection water can lower oil/water IFT and alter the wettability of the rock/oil/brine system and, hence, improve oil recovery. However, these interfacial rock/fluid interactions are sensitive to temperature and pressure, in addition to being time dependent. Therefore, the results of the laboratory tests conducted at ambient conditions cannot be representative of rock/fluid interactions at real reservoir conditions. Hence, the experimental study of time-dependent (dynamic) behavior of interfacial properties (IFT and contact angles) at reservoir conditions (high temperature and high pressures) is necessary for selection and applicability of suitable surfactants for economic field application. Also, the selection of a particular laboratory measurement technique to suit the complex experimental environment is essential for reliable results at high pressures and temperatures. Therefore, a brief review of literature on various available measurement techniques for the interfacial properties of IFT and contact angles as well as the pressure and temperature effects on these interfacial properties is provided below.

View full textPDF ( 2,735 KB )

History

  • Original manuscript received: 12 June 2006
  • Meeting paper published: 9 October 2005
  • Revised manuscript received: 18 March 2007
  • Manuscript approved: 16 May 2007
  • Version of record: 25 February 2008