SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
Volume 11, Number 1, February 2008, pp. 95-107

SPE-96414-PA

A Well Test for In-Situ Determination of Relative Permeability Curves

View full textPDF ( 2,605 KB )

DOI  More information 10.2118/96414-PA http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/96414-PA

Citation

  • Chen, S., Li, G., Peres, A., and Reynolds, A.C. 2008. A Well Test for In-Situ Determination of Relative Permeability Curves. SPE Res Eval & Eng11 (1): 95-107. SPE-96414-PA.

Summary

We propose a novel well-test for in-situ estimation of relative permeabilities under two-phase (oil/water) flow conditions. The test consists of three periods: injection of water into an oil reservoir operating above bubblepoint pressure, a falloff test, and a producing period. The producing period is critical because it yields production data that reflect changes in sandface mobility and thus is highly sensitive to the parameters used to model relative permeability curves, whereas our results indicate that injection/falloff pressure data by themselves are not as reliable for defining relative permeability curves. We have developed optimization code based on the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm and coupled it with a commercial reservoir simulator to obtain a procedure for data analysis wherein the reservoir simulator is used as the forward model. By matching data by minimization of a weighted least-squares objective function, we generate estimates of absolute permeability, relative permeability, and the well skin factor. We show the method can be applied with either power-law models or B-splines. We introduce a variable transformation that can be used to ensure that the estimated relative permeabilities are monotonic and concave up when B-splines are used.

Introduction

Numerous papers from the 1970s and 1980s discuss techniques for the estimation of relative permeability curves by matching pressure and rate (or displaced volume) data from laboratory corefloods using an optimization algorithm to minimize a least-squares objective function (Archer and Wong 1973; Sigmund and McCaffery 1979; Kerig and Watson 1986; Watson et al. 1988). Assuming power-law relative permeability curves yields a small number of parameters to be estimated and a well-conditioned optimization problem. However, relative permeability curves may not be well represented by power law models. Because of this, various authors used splines, especially B-spines, to parameterize relative permeability curves, but then special techniques were required to regularize the optimization process and ensure that monotonic relative permeability curves are obtained (Watson et al. 1988).

Although many papers have also proposed using similar techniques to adjust relative permeability curves by matching long-time production data, our objective is to generate a procedure to estimate relative permeability curves from a well test which has a duration of a few hours to a very few days. Intuitively, to do this successfully, we should generate data that are sensitive to a wide range of saturations (i.e., generate data similar to those which can be obtained in a laboratory coreflood). To do so, we propose an injection/falloff test followed by a production period. The idea is that, during the flowback period, the sandface will be exposed to a wide range of water saturations and the associated pressure and phase-rate data or water-cut data should be sufficient to obtain good estimates of relative permeability curves.

We compare results obtained from the proposed test with those obtained from a more standard injection/falloff test. Even though accurate approximate analytical solutions for the injection and falloff pressure response for radial flow problems have been presented previously in the petroleum engineering literature (Abbaszadeh and Kamal 1989; Bratvold and Horne 1990; Levitan 2003; Peres and Reynolds 2003; Peres et al. 2006), all data considered in this paper are analyzed by nonlinear regression using a commercial reservoir simulator as the forward model (IMEX 2000). Of the analytical solutions for the injection/falloff pressure, the one provided by Levitan (2003) is most general and most useful as it applies for a multirate injectivity test where the rate, during one or more of the periods, can be zero to simulate shutin periods for falloff testing. His solution, however, does not apply during a subsequent production period and thus cannot be used to analyze the test proposed here.

We consider both the case in which relative permeabilities are modelled by power-law formulas as well as a more flexible parameterization based on B-splines. Parameters defining relative permeability curves are estimated simultaneously with reservoir absolute permeability and skin factor.

View full textPDF ( 2,605 KB )

History

  • Original manuscript received: 26 July 2005
  • Meeting paper published: 9 October 2005
  • Revised manuscript received: 19 May 2007
  • Manuscript approved: 19 October 2007
  • Version of record: 25 February 2008