SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
Volume 11,
Number 4,
August 2008,
pp. 696-706
Summary
The conventional reserves estimate methods for waterdrive reservoirs are
well established. Typically, the techniques proposed by Havlena and Odeh (1963
and 1964) and McEwen (1962) are used. In general, the reserves estimated from
these procedures are not unique since the recorded historical production data
are simultaneously solved for aquifer parameters and reserves. Normally,
multiple combinations of reserves and aquifer parameters match the field data
equally well. Hence, a range of reserves--rather than a unique value--is found.
The upper and lower limits of the reserves range may vary several-fold.
In this paper, a hybrid approach that makes use of available methods is used
to narrow the reserves range estimates in waterdrive gas reservoirs. The hybrid
approach combines the McEwen method, apparent gas-in-place (GIP) vs. time, the
modified Roach (1981) method, and the modified Havlena and Odeh method for
partial waterdrive.
© 2008. Society of Petroleum Engineers
View full textPDF
(
2,465 KB
)
History
- Original manuscript received:
17 March 2006
- Meeting paper published:
12 June 2006
- Revised manuscript received:
3 March 2008
- Manuscript approved:
19 March 2008
- Version of record:
20 August 2008