SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
Volume 13,
Number 2,
April 2010,
pp. 193-202
Summary
One of the key issues in creating a good reservoir model in carbonate
reservoirs is identifying the horizontal permeability conduits--"thief
zones"--if there are any. In the Sabriyah field in Kuwait, dynamic measurements
showed evidence of thief zones in the Lower Cretaceous (Albian) Mauddud
formation. Early water breakthrough has occurred in some wells. Previous
studies indicated that it was very challenging to detect the thinly layered
thief zones using conventional openhole logs. This paper describes a method of
recognizing the different types of thief zones in the Mauddud carbonate
reservoirs using high-resolution image logs with calibration from core and
dynamic measurements and by integrating image logs with nuclear magnetic
resonance (NMR) and conventional openhole logs.
The Mauddud carbonates are Early Albian in age and consist of grainstones,
wackstones, and mudstones deposited in a ramp setting. Observations from
production logging tools (PLTs) and production data indicated that there are a
few thief zones in different levels within the vertical Mauddud sequence. A
previous core study shows that the fractures in the Mauddud formation are short
(<10 cm) and concentrated in diagenetically cemented layers. The fractured
thin layers are believed to be the principal type of thief zone. Another type
of thief zone is associated with better-developed vuggy porosity. This study
shows that both fractured and vuggy porosity-related types of thief zones can
potentially be detected through integration of high-resolution image logs with
PLT, NMR, and conventional logs. In addition, methods of estimating fracture
permeability and porosity-related permeability based on logs are also proposed.
The log-estimated permeability determined using this approach fits better with
the production profile and can then be used to evaluate the thief zones in a
more quantitative manner.
© 2010. Society of Petroleum Engineers
View full textPDF
(
2,606 KB
)
History
- Original manuscript received:
7 July 2008
- Meeting paper published:
21 September 2008
- Revised manuscript received:
2 May 2009
- Manuscript approved:
21 June 2009
- Published online:
1 April 2010
- Version of record:
20 April 2010