Summary
We present results studying the enhanced-oil-recovery (EOR) potential for
carbon dioxide (CO2) injection in the naturally fractured Haft Kel
field, Iran, on the basis of detailed compositional simulations of a
homogeneous single matrix block surrounded by fractures. Oil recoveries from
CO2 injection in this idealized model approach 90% for reservoir
pressures of 1,400 psia and higher (i.e., at and above current reservoir
pressure of 1,500-1,800 psia). It is expected that heterogeneity will reduce
recovery on the field scale. This compares with 15-25% recoveries reported for
gas-cap expansion and/or injection of hydrocarbon (HC) gas.
Fundamentally different recovery mechanisms develop above and below 2,000
psia, the pressure at which CO2 density equals the reservoir-oil
density. At lower pressures, CO2 is less dense than reservoir oil
and traditional gas/oil gravity segregation results, with a highly efficient
process driven by gravity, compositional effects, and interfacial-tension (IFT)
gradients that cause capillary-induced oil flow. At pressures greater than
2,000 psia, CO2 density is greater than reservoir-oil density,
resulting in an unusual gravity-drainage mechanism whereby CO2
enters the bottom of a matrix block and pushes oil out the sides and top of the
matrix block.
The effect of several key parameters has been studied in detail--matrix
permeability, matrix-block size, matrix/matrix capillary continuity (stacked
blocks), and the use of mixtures of CO2 and HC gas. One of the key
results is how the rate of recovery differs for combined injection of HC gas
and CO2, and how it varies for CO2 injection for
different model parameters.
EOR results are affected by grid sensitivity. Grid effects have been
quantified and compared for different model parameters. Final EOR assessment is
made using models where sufficient grid refinement is used to minimize grid
sensitivity.
© 2010. Society of Petroleum Engineers
View full textPDF
(
1,177 KB
)
History
- Original manuscript received:
25 August 2009
- Meeting paper published:
22 November 2009
- Revised manuscript received:
9 April 2010
- Manuscript approved:
20 April 2010
- Published online:
19 August 2010
- Version of record:
24 August 2010