SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
Volume 14,
Number 1,
February 2011,
pp. 60-75
Summary
Coalbed methane (CBM) produced from subsurface coal deposits has been
produced commercially for more than 30 years in North America, and relatively
recently in Australia, China, and India. Historical challenges to predicting
CBM-well performance and long-term production have included accurate estimation
of gas in place (including quantification of in-situ sorbed gas storage);
estimation of initial fluid saturations (in saturated reservoirs) and mobile
water in place; estimation of the degree of undersaturation (undersaturated
coals produce mainly water above desorption pressure); estimation of initial
absolute permeability (system); selection of appropriate relative permeability
curves; estimation of absolute-permeability changes as a function of depletion;
prediction of produced-gas composition changes as a function of depletion;
accounting for multilayer behavior; and accurate prediction of cavity or
hydraulic-fracture properties. These challenges have primarily been a result of
the unique reservoir properties of CBM. Much progress has been made in the past
decade to evaluate fundamental properties of coal reservoirs, but obtaining
accurate estimates of some basic reservoir and geomechanical properties remains
challenging.
The purpose of the current work is to review the state of the art in
field-based techniques for CBM reservoir-property and stimulation-efficiency
evaluation. Advances in production and pressure-transient analysis, gas-content
determination, and material-balance methods made in the past 2 decades will be
summarized. The impact of these new methods on the evaluation of key reservoir
properties, such as absolute/relative permeability and gas content/gas in
place, as well as completion/stimulation properties will be discussed.
Recommendations on key surveillance data to assist with field-based evaluation
of CBM, along with insight into practical usage of these data, will be
provided.
© 2011. Society of Petroleum Engineers
View full textPDF
(
1,089 KB
)
History
- Original manuscript received:
16 February 2010
- Meeting paper published:
23 February 2010
- Revised manuscript received:
4 October 2010
- Manuscript approved:
11 October 2010
- Published online:
7 February 2011
- Version of record:
21 February 2011