SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
Volume 15,
Number 3,
June 2012,
pp. 290-299
Summary
Case studies are presented in this paper to demonstrate the use of the
pressure/rate deconvolution-approach in estimating drainage areas for wells
completed in some of the naturally fractured tight gas reservoirs of the
Canadian Rockies foothills. These case studies demonstrate the application of
deconvolution to two key carbonate-stratigraphical horizons in the area: the
Triassic Baldonnel and the Permo-Carboniferous Taylor Flat formations. In these
structural plays with significant areal formation-rock heterogeneity, the
matrix-rock properties controlling the gas storativity are low, with porosity
between 3 and 6%, causing low matrix-rock permeability (from 0.01 and 0.1 md).
However, all of these formations have been thrusted, overturned, and subjected
to reverse faulting. These diagenetic factors have created swarms of natural
fractures that control flow rates and may define rock volumes connected to
individual wells.
In each well, a preproduction flow test was performed with the intent of
ensuring acceptable flow rates and scoping facility design. At this stage of
early development, initial-gas-in-place (IGIP) estimates were derived mainly
from geophysical mapping, with plans to calibrate the IGIP number through the
application of gas material balance, rate-transient analysis, and/or simple
late-time rate decline. The rate-history data available in the early stage of
production were integrated with pressure-buildup (PBU) data collected later in
the production life of the well during annual or routine shut-in periods that
were relatively short. Application of deconvolution in this paper is aimed at
detecting early signs of pseudosteady-state pool depletion and estimating
connected drainage volume. The deconvolution procedures help calibrate and/or
reconcile geosciences-defined volumetric resource sizes, map remaining
reserves, and help identify possible infill-drilling opportunities.
© 2012. Society of Petroleum Engineers
View full textPDF
(
9,001 KB
)
History
- Original manuscript received:
24 February 2011
- Meeting paper published:
24 May 2011
- Revised manuscript received:
7 December 2011
- Manuscript approved:
17 January 2012
- Published online:
10 May 2012
- Version of record:
12 June 2012