SPE Journal
Volume 14, Number 1, March 2009, pp. 202-210

SPE-102913-PA

Robust Waterflooding Optimization of Multiple Geological Scenarios

View full textPDF ( 818 KB )

DOI  More information 10.2118/102913-PA http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/102913-PA

Citation

  • van Essen, G.M., Zandvliet, M.J., Van den Hof, P.M.J., Bosgra, O.H., and Jansen, J.D. 2009. Robust Waterflooding Optimazation of Multiple Geological Scenarios. SPE J.  14 (1): 202-210. SPE-102913-PA.

Discipline Categories

  • 5 Production and Operations
  • 6 Reservoir Description and Dynamics

Summary

Dynamic optimization of waterflooding using optimal control theory has significant potential to increase ultimate recovery, as has been shown in various studies. However, optimal control strategies often lack robustness to geological uncertainties. We present an approach to reduce the effect of geological uncertainties in the field-development phase known as robust optimization (RO). RO uses a set of realizations that reflect the range of possible geological structures honoring the statistics of the geological uncertainties. In our study, we used 100 realizations of a 3D reservoir in a fluvial depositional environment with known main-flow direction. We optimized the rates of the eight injection and four production wells over the life of the reservoir, with the objective to maximize the average net present value (NPV). We used a gradient-based optimization method in which the gradients are obtained with an adjoint formulation. We compared the results of the RO procedure to two alternative approaches: a nominal-optimization (NO) and a reactive-control approach. In the reactive approach, each production well is shut in when production is no longer profitable. The NO procedure is based on a single realization. In our study, the NO procedure is performed on each of the 100 realizations in the set individually, resulting in 100 different NO-production strategies. The control strategies were applied to each realization, from which the average NPVs, the standard deviation, the cumulative-distribution functions, and the probability-density functions were determined. The RO results displayed a much smaller variance than the alternatives, indicating an increased robustness to geological uncertainty. Moreover, the RO procedure significantly improved the expected NPV compared to the alternative methods (on average 9.5% higher than using reactive-control and 5.9% higher than the average of the NO strategies).

Introduction

In this paper, we consider the secondary-recovery phase of a petroleum reservoir using waterflooding. In this case, a number of injection and production wells are drilled to preserve a steady reservoir pressure and sweep the reservoir. The use of smart wells expands the possibilities to manipulate and control fluid-flow paths through the oil reservoir. The ability to manipulate (to some degree) the progression of the oil/water front provides the possibility to search for a control strategy that will result in maximization of ultimate oil recovery.

Dynamic optimization of waterflooding using optimal control theory has significant potential to increase ultimate recovery by delaying water breakthrough and increasing sweep, as has been shown in various studies (Brouwer and Jansen 2004). However, optimal control strategies often lack robustness to geological uncertainties. By discarding these uncertainties, the sensitivity to a possibly large system/model mismatch is not taken into account within the optimization procedure. As a result, the optimal control strategy may cease to be optimal or may even result in very poor performance.

Dealing with uncertainty is a topic encountered in many fields related to modeling and control. It can essentially be divided into two different strategies, which are not mutually exclusive: reducing the uncertainty itself using measurements [i.e., history matching (Landa and Horne 1997, Li et al. 2003)] and reducing the sensitivity to the uncertainty. In this paper, we consider a situation in which no production data are assumed to be available, which rules out any history-matching approach to reduce the geological uncertainty. Our study forms part of a larger research project to enable closed-loop, model-based reservoir management (Jansen et al. 2005).

A suggested approach from the process industry, to optimization problems that suffer from vast uncertainty and limited measurement information, is the use of a so-called RO technique (Srinivasan et al. 2003, Terwiesch et al. 1998, Ruppen et al. 1995). In RO, the optimization procedure is performed over a set of realizations, actively accounting for the influence of the uncertainty. The implementation of multiple realizations within the optimization process has been addressed by Yeten et al. (2002). However, their study deviates in the way the realizations are incorporated in the objective function, in the optimization method, and in the number of realizations. The goal of our paper is to present an RO procedure on the basis of a set of 100 realizations of a 3D oil/water reservoir, which leads to a control strategy that accounts explicitly for geological uncertainty.

View full textPDF ( 818 KB )

History

  • Original manuscript received: 22 June 2006
  • Meeting paper published: 24 September 2006
  • Revised manuscript received: 14 March 2008
  • Manuscript approved: 27 August 2008
  • Published online: 16 March 2009
  • Version of record: 1 March 2009