SPE Journal
Volume 14, Number 3, September 2009, pp. 488-495

SPE-110465-PA

Superposition Principle and Reciprocity for Pressure Transient Analysis of Data From Interfering Wells

View full textPDF ( 314 KB )

DOI  More information 10.2118/110465-PA http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/110465-PA

Citation

  • Gringarten, A.C. and von Schroeter, T. 2009. Superposition Principle and Reciprocity for Pressure Transient Analysis of Data From Interfering Wells. SPE J.  14 (3): 488-495. SPE-110465-PA. doi: 10.2118/110465-PA.

Discipline Categories

  • 6.6.3 Pressure Transient Testing
  • 6.6 Reservoir Monitoring/Formation Evaluation
  • 6 Reservoir Description and Dynamics

Keywords

  • interfering wells, extended sinks/sources, Green's functions, deconvolution, reciprocity

Summary

Based on a linearized model for the isothermal flow of a single, compressible phase through a reservoir of arbitrary shape with impermeable or constant-pressure boundaries and spatially varying, anisotropic rock properties, we develop a multiwell extension of the superposition principle and re-examine the question of reciprocity between wells that may be modeled as point sinks or as extended sinks. In the latter case, we find that the answer depends on the wellbore boundary conditions: Reciprocity holds for infinite conductivity wells but fails to hold for spatially uniform sink strength. We also derive a multiwell generalization of the fractional transformation in the Laplace domain, which adds skin and wellbore storage to a reservoir model, and find that its impact on reciprocity is neutral: It preserves reciprocity if it holds for the reservoir model.

Introduction

Data from interfering wells have been a long-standing challenge for well test analysis. The challenge is more acute than ever as multiple active wells per reservoir compartment are now the norm in optimized production plans; it is compounded by the trend toward more complex well trajectories (see Fig. 1 for an example). The central signal processing task remains to estimate the rate-normalized pressure drop and its time derivative (Bourdet et al. 1983, 1989) for each well in response to its own production as well as to that of the other wells. As in the case of a single well (van Everdingen and Hurst 1949), this is a deconvolution problem.

A recent study (Levitan 2007) showed how the same principles that proved successful in single-well deconvolution (von Schroeter et al. 2004; Levitan 2005) can be extended to multiple wells. This study assumed reciprocity between wells (i.e., that the rate-normalized pressure drop at one well in response to production at another is the same as vice versa), which halves the number of interference signals to be estimated. For wells modeled as point sinks (such as fully penetrating vertical wells in a conducting layer of constant thickness), reciprocity follows from the symmetry of Green's function in its spatial arguments, a fact established by several authors (McKinley et al. 1968; Deng and Horne 1993) under various physical assumptions.

However, for extended sinks (such as horizontal, inclined, curved, and fractured wells) the picture is more complicated, as we show in this paper. Based on a linearized model for the flow of a single, compressible phase through a reservoir of arbitrary shape with spatially varying permeability tensor, we derive multiwell extensions of the superposition principle and deduce the symmetry of Green's function, which establishes reciprocity at the level of point sinks for a wider class of reservoir models than hitherto considered, and by a simplified mathematical route. For extended wells, we find that reciprocity depends on the boundary conditions: It holds for infinite conductivity wells but fails to hold for spatially uniform sink strength. Moreover, the fractional transformations applied in the Laplace domain to add skin and wellbore storage to a reservoir model preserve reciprocity if it holds for the reservoir model.

As our investigation relies heavily on Green's functions and related mathematical concepts, we illustrate the methodology with a simple yet instructive analytic example.

View full textPDF ( 314 KB )

History

  • Original manuscript received: 8 August 2007
  • Meeting paper published: 11 November 2007
  • Revised manuscript received: 30 June 2008
  • Manuscript approved: 7 July 2008
  • Published online: 23 July 2009
  • Version of record: 28 September 2009