SPE Journal
Volume 15, Number 1, March 2010, pp. 208-222

SPE-115726-PA

Gas-Condensate Relative Permeabilities in Propped-Fracture Porous Media: Coupling vs. Inertia

View full textPDF ( 620 KB )

DOI  More information 10.2118/115726-PA http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/115726-PA

Citation

  • Jamiolahmady, M., Sohrabi, M., and Ireland, S. 2010. Gas/Condensate Relative Permeabilities in Propped-Fracture Porous Media: Coupling vs. Inertia. SPE J.  15 (1): 208-222. SPE-115726-PA. doi: 10.2118/115726-PA.

Discipline Categories

  • 5.3.3 Hydraulic Fracturing and Gravel Packing
  • 6.8 Fundamental Research in Reservoir Description and Dynamics
  • 6.3.2 Multi-phase Flow
  • 6.6.5 Well Performance Monitoring, Inflow Performance
  • 6.7.2 Recovery Factors

Keywords

  • hydraulic fracturing; tight gas/condensate reservoirs; coupling/inertia; propped fractures; near miscible relative permeability

Summary

Hydraulic fracturing is one of the most common well stimulation techniques for gas/condensate reservoirs. In recent years, considerable effort has been directed toward the understanding of flow around hydraulically fractured wells, especially for tight gas reservoirs. However, there has been no report of a study of flow behavior within propped-fractured porous media for the low interfacial tension (IFT) gas/condensate fluid systems.

It is now a well established finding both experimentally and theoretically that the flow of gas/condensate fluid systems in porous media is affected by both coupling (the increase of relative permeability kr as velocity increases or IFT decreases) and inertial (i.e,. the reduction of kr as velocity increases) effects. However, the interaction of capillary, viscous and inertial forces within highly conductive propped fractures is not yet understood.

In this work, different series of steady-state gas/condensate kr values for a proppant-filled and a sand-packed fracture with permeability of 146 darcy and 15 darcy, respectively, are reported. These experimentally measured sets of kr data cover IFT and velocity values ranging between 0.85 and 0.15 mNm−1 and 250 to 3000 md−1, respectively.

The results indicate that inertia is quite dominant at all the tested conditions albeit to a greater extent at lower IFT and higher gas fractional flow rates. In the case of the fracture with the higher permeability, some kr values measured at the higher IFT are also reported, which are higher than the corresponding values at a lower IFT. These kr measurements are also compared with the corresponding predicted kr values using the generalized kr correlation reported recently by Jamiolahmady et al. (2009). The correlation expresses the combined effect of coupling and inertia with universal parameters. The unique contribution of inertial forces, as observed in the experiments and predicted by the correlation, is mainly attributed to the velocity, petrophysical properties of the fracture, and fluid properties of the flowing phases.

View full textPDF ( 620 KB )

History

  • Original manuscript received: 7 July 2008
  • Meeting paper published: 21 September 2008
  • Revised manuscript received: 15 May 2009
  • Manuscript approved: 25 May 2009
  • Published online: 5 November 2009
  • Version of record: 12 March 2010