SPE Journal
Volume 16, Number 1, March 2011, pp. 155-161

SPE-118701-PA

Skimmer Capacity for Viscous Oil

View full textPDF ( 625 KB )

DOI  More information 10.2118/118701-PA http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/118701-PA

Citation

  • Moxness, V.W., Gåseidnes,K., and Asheim, H. 2011. Skimmer Capacity for Viscous Oil. SPE J.  16 (1): 155-161. SPE-118701-PA. doi: 10.2118/118701-PA.

Discipline Categories

  • 2.5.6 Oil and Chemical Spills
  • 6.3.2 Multi-phase Flow

Keywords

  • pollution control, oil spill, skimmer, segregated flow, experimental

Summary

When a skimmer removes oil locally, oil floating further away will flow toward it. The maximum flow rate toward the skimmer defines its natural capacity. Traditional skimmer-capacity modeling considers flow driven by height potential and resisted by inertial forces but neglects viscosity. On the basis of theory and experiments, this paper claims that high oil viscosity may govern the skimmer capacity.

It is shown that viscous resistance relates to a dimensionless quantity called the Goose number, representing the ratio of inertial to viscous forces. At high Goose numbers, viscosity may be neglected. At sufficiently low Goose numbers, viscous resistance dominates. A numerical solution applicable to all Goose numbers has been developed. Analytical formulas for skimmer capacity at high and low Goose numbers are provided.

A scaled laboratory facility was built to investigate the skimming of viscous oil. The measured rates were consistent with the numerical predictions and with the formula for low Goose number. With decreasing viscosity, predictions by the current model converged to traditional formulas that neglect viscosity.

The model quantifies how skimming capacity is affected by size and by properties of the oil spill and skimmer geometry and submergence. This may enable more rational skimmer design and operation, and even optimization.

View full textPDF ( 625 KB )

History

  • Original manuscript received: 10 April 2009
  • Meeting paper published: 24 March 2009
  • Revised manuscript received: 19 March 2010
  • Manuscript approved: 2 April 2010
  • Published online: 19 August 2010
  • Version of record: 15 March 2011