SPE Journal
Volume 15,
Number 3,
September 2010,
pp. 770-782
Summary
The production or injection of fluids in reservoirs results in a
redistribution of stresses. In this paper, the extent of stress reorientation
has been calculated for fractured production and injection wells and the
results have been analyzed for their effect on refracturing operations. Rules
of thumb and charts have been provided to help with candidate-well selection
for refracturing on the basis of the study.
For previously fractured wells, it is possible to create a secondary
fracture that is perpendicular to the first. The secondary orthogonal fracture
can be created only within a certain time window that, in turn, depends on the
reservoir properties. Conditions leading to orthogonal secondary fractures in
different kinds of reservoirs (oil, gas, and tight gas reservoirs) have been
analyzed to establish some rules of thumb. The effects of the layers bounding
the pay zone and of permeability heterogeneity and anisotropy on stress
reorientation are also discussed.
Our results allow us to quantify the phenomenon of orthogonal secondary
fracturing around fractured production wells by calculating the extent of the
stress-reversal region as a function of time. The results of our model are
shown to agree qualitatively with field observations obtained from microseismic
measurements. The model presented in the study helps to clarify the concept of
refracturing and provides a quantitative estimate of the time window for
refracturing as a function of dimensionless parameters. The final result
demonstrates the potential of the model to increase the reservoir sweep in
unconventional reservoirs for which the optimum time window for refracturing is
on the order of months to years. The conclusions of this study are useful for
the design of refracturing operations and for candidate-well selection.
© 2010. Society of Petroleum Engineers
View full textPDF
(
1,054 KB
)
History
- Original manuscript received:
12 November 2008
- Meeting paper published:
20 January 2009
- Revised manuscript received:
26 October 2009
- Manuscript approved:
11 November 2009
- Published online:
27 April 2010
- Version of record:
22 September 2010