Summary
Containment security of geologically stored CO2 is improved
substantially through trapping mechanisms. Therefore, to simulate the potential
viability of a storage site, it is necessary to account for immobilization
processes. In this paper, we focus on a quantitative measure for the
contribution of hysteresis in reducing plume transport, with particular
emphasis on capillary-pressure-induced migration retardation. Rocks with large
pore-body-to-throat-size ratio, or a low permeability, are the best candidates
for this mechanism to be operative.
In the present work, a self-consistent relative permeability and capillary
pressure hysteresis model is incorporated within a simulator. With this model,
it is possible to compare and contrast hysteresis-induced retardation to other
mechanisms of trapping. The self-consistent parameterization of all of the
transport properties is used to quantify sensitivity compactly. The sensitivity
of the CO2-plume shape and the amount of CO2 trapped to
the strength of the capillary pressure hysteresis is also described.
Simulated results show that the CO2-plume shapes with and without
capillary pressure hysteresis are significantly different. As expected,
capillary pressure hysteresis retards the buoyant transport of the
CO2 plume. Although a portion of the CO2 is connected,
and therefore not residual, the plume remains immobile for all practical
purposes. Also, because of the decreased driving potential, gravity tonguing
below the caprock is reduced in comparison to the case without capillary
pressure hysteresis, thus suggesting enhanced storage efficiency. However, the
total dissolution of CO2 in saline water is reduced because of the
reduced contact area with the brine. Thus, one mechanism of containment is
offset by the other.
Inclusion of accurate hysteresis models is important for qualifying storage
sites constrained by spatial-domain limits. It is anticipated that
site-acceptability criteria would change as a result of this study, thereby
impacting risk evaluation.
© 2011. Society of Petroleum Engineers
View full textPDF
(
2,549 KB
)
History
- Original manuscript received:
20 September 2010
- Meeting paper published:
10 November 2010
- Revised manuscript received:
17 January 2011
- Manuscript approved:
31 January 2011
- Published online:
10 November 2011
- Version of record:
23 December 2011