SPE Journal
Volume 10,
Number 4,
December 2005,
pp. 458-465
Summary
An approach was developed to extract the imbibition capillary pressure and
the global mobility data from spontaneous water imbibition tests in
oil/water/rock systems. Capillary pressure and global mobility data were
calculated using this method with the experimental data of countercurrent
spontaneous water imbibition tests in different rocks and at different
interfacial tensions. The calculated capillary pressures were consistent with
the change in interfacial tension. The oil/water/rock systems with greater
interfacial tensions had greater capillary pressures. However the
oil/water/rock systems with greater capillary pressure may not have greater
imbibition rate. The calculated values of the global mobility and the
imbibition index explain why the oil recovery or the imbibition rate in systems
with high interfacial tension was smaller than that in systems with low
interfacial tension, which has been considered a paradoxical result for many
years.
Capillary pressure is of fundamental significance in reservoir engineering.
Capillary pressure data are measured often using porous-plate, centrifuge, and
mercury-injection techniques. These methods can suffer limitations in one or
more aspects. For example, the porous-plate and centrifuge methods may have
difficulty for core samples with a very low permeability; mercury intrusion
technique cannot represent the true reservoir fluids. Spontaneous imbibition in
porous media is a process dominated by the effect of capillary pressure. It
would be useful if capillary pressure data could be extracted from spontaneous
imbibition tests, because such tests are relatively simple, fast, and
economical. Also, spontaneous imbibition tests are more representative of the
fluid flow that happens in fractured reservoirs compared to the frequently used
methods such as porous-plate, centrifuge, and mercury-injection approaches.
However, it has been a challenge for a long time to extract capillary pressure
from spontaneous imbibition tests.
© 2005. Society of Petroleum Engineers
View full textPDF
(
146 KB
)
History
- Original manuscript received:
12 August 2003
- Revised manuscript received:
1 June 2005
- Manuscript approved:
4 August 2005
- Version of record:
15 December 2005