Summary
Waterflooding recovers little oil from fractured carbonate reservoirs, if
they are oil-wet or mixed-wet. Surfactant-aided gravity drainage has the
potential to achieve significant oil recovery by wettability alteration and
interfacial tension (IFT) reduction. The goal of this work is to investigate
the mechanisms of wettability alteration by crude oil components and
surfactants. Contact angles are measured on mineral plates treated with crude
oils, crude oil components, and surfactants. Mineral surfaces are also studied
by atomic force microscopy (AFM). Surfactant solution imbibition into parallel
plates filled with a crude oil is investigated. Wettability of the plates is
studied before and after imbibition. Results show that wettability is
controlled by the adsorption of asphaltenes. Anionic surfactants can remove
these adsorbed components from the mineral surface and induce preferential
water wettability. Anionic surfactants studied can imbibe water into initially
oil-wet parallel-plate assemblies faster than the cationic surfactant
studied.
Introduction
Waterflooding is an effective method to improve oil recovery from
reservoirs. For fractured reservoirs, waterflooding is effective only when
water imbibes into the matrix spontaneously. If the matrix is oil-wet, the
injected water displaces the oil only from the fractures. Water does not imbibe
into the oil-wet matrix because of negative capillary pressure, resulting in
very low oil recovery. Thus there is a need of tertiary or enhanced oil
recovery techniques like surfactant flooding (Bragg et al. 1982; Kalpakci et
al. 1990; Krumrine et al. 1982a; Krumrine et al. 1982b; Falls et al. 1992) to
maximize production from such reservoirs. These techniques were developed in
1960s through 1980s for sandstone reservoirs, but were not widely applied
because of low oil prices.
Austad et al. (Austad and Milter 1997; Standnes and Austad 2000a; Standnes
and Austad 2000b; Standnes and Austad 2003c) have recently demonstrated that
surfactant flooding in chalk cores can change the wettability from oil-wet to
water-wet conditions, thus leading to higher oil recovery (~70 % as compared to
5% when using pure brine). In 2003 (Standnes and Austad 2003a; Standnes and
Austad 2003b; Strand et al. 2003), they identified cheap commercial cationic
surfactants, C10NH2 and bioderivatives from the coconut
palm termed Arquad and Dodigen (priced at US $3 per kg). These surfactants
could recover 50 to 90% of oil in laboratory experiments. However, the cost
involved is still high because of the required high concentration (~1 wt%) and
thus there is a need to evaluate other surfactants. The advantage of using
cationic surfactants for carbonates is that they have the same charge as the
carbonate surfaces and thus have low adsorption. Nonionic surfactants and
anionic surfactants have been tested by Chen et al. (2001) in both laboratory
experiments and field pilots. Computed tomography scans revealed that
surfactant imbibition was caused by countercurrent flow in the beginning and
gravity-driven flow during the later stages.
The basic idea behind these techniques is to alter wettability (from oil-wet
to water-wet) and lower interfacial tension. Hirasaki and Zhang (2004) have
studied different ethoxy and propoxy sulfates to achieve very low interfacial
tension and alter wettability from oil-wet to intermediate-wet in laboratory
experiments. The presence of Na2CO3 reduces the
adsorption of anionic surfactant by lowering the zeta potential of calcite
surfaces, and thus dilute anionic surfactant/alkali solution flooding seems to
be very promising in recovering oil from oil-wet fractured carbonate
reservoirs.
It is very important to understand the mechanism of wettability alteration
to design effective surfactant treatments and identify the components of oil
responsible for making a surface oil-wet. It is postulated that oil is often
produced in source rocks and then migrates into originally water-wet
reservoirs. Some of the ionic/polar components of crude oil, mostly asphaltenes
and resins, collect at the water/oil interface (Freer et al. 2003) and adsorb
onto the mineral surface, thus rendering the surface oil-wet.
In this work, we try to understand the nature of the adsorbed components by
AFM. Recently, AFM has been used extensively to get the force-distance
measurements between a tip and a surface. These force measurements can be used
to calculate the surface energies using the Johnson-Kendall-Roberts (JKR), the
Derjaguin-Muller-Toporov (DMT), and like theories (van der Vegte and
Hadziioannou 1997; Schneider et al. 2003). AFM is also used extensively for
imaging surfaces. It can be used in the contact mode for hard surfaces and in
the tapping mode for soft surfaces. It can be used to image dry surfaces or wet
surfaces; tapping mode in water is a relatively new technique. AFM images have
been used to confirm the deposition of oil components on mineral surfaces
(Buckley and Lord 2003; Toulhoat et al. 1994). In this work, crude-oil-treated
mica surface is probed using atomic force microscopy before and after
surfactant treatment to study the effects of surfactant. AFM measurements are
correlated with contact-angle measurements. We also study surfactant solution
imbibition into an initially oil-wet parallel plate assembly to relate
wettability to oil recovery. Our experimental methodology is described in the
next section, the results are discussed in the following section, and the
conclusions are summarized in the last section.
© 2008. Society of Petroleum Engineers
View full textPDF
(
1,614 KB
)
History
- Original manuscript received:
9 December 2004
- Meeting paper published:
2 February 2005
- Revised manuscript received:
6 January 2008
- Manuscript approved:
8 January 2008
- Version of record:
25 June 2008