SPE Journal
Volume 16,
Number 3,
September 2011,
pp. 575-581
Summary
Recent examples of hydraulic-fracture diagnostic data suggest that complex,
multistranded hydraulic-fracture geometry is a common occurrence. This reality
is in stark contrast to the industry-standard design models based on the
assumption of symmetric, planar, biwing geometry. The interaction between
pre-existing natural fractures and the advancing hydraulic fracture is a key
condition leading to complex fracture patterns. Performing
hydraulic-fracture-design calculations under these less-than-ideal conditions
requires modeling fracture intersections and tracking fluid fronts in the
network of reactivated fissures. Whether a hydraulic fracture crosses or is
arrested by a pre-existing natural fracture is controlled by shear strength and
potential slippage at the fracture intersections, as well as potential
debonding of sealed cracks in the near-tip region of a propagating hydraulic
fracture. We present a complex hydraulic-fracture pattern propagation model
based on the extended finite-element method (XFEM) as a design tool that can be
used to optimize treatment parameters under complex propagation conditions.
Results demonstrate that fracture-pattern complexity is strongly controlled by
the magnitude of anisotropy of in-situ stresses, rock toughness, and
natural-fracture cement strength, as well as the orientation of the natural
fractures relative to the hydraulic fracture. Analysis shows that the growing
hydraulic fracture may exert enough tensile and shear stresses on cemented
natural fractures that the latter may be debonded, opened, and/or sheared in
advance of hydraulic-fracture-tip arrival, while under other conditions,
natural fractures will be unaffected by the hydraulic fracture. Detailed
aperture distributions at the intersection between fracture segments show the
potential for difficulty in proppant transport under complex
fracture-propagation conditions.
© 2011. Society of Petroleum Engineers
View full textPDF
(
669 KB
)
History
- Original manuscript received:
20 August 2010
- Meeting paper published:
5 October 2009
- Revised manuscript received:
3 February 2011
- Manuscript approved:
17 February 2011
- Published online:
9 June 2011
- Version of record:
15 September 2011