SPE Journal
Volume 17, Number 3, September 2012, pp. 661-670

SPE-129966-PA

Applying Fractional-Flow Theory Under the Loss of Miscibility

View full textPDF ( 5,857 KB )

DOI  More information 10.2118/129966-PA http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/129966-PA

Citation

  • Ghanbarnezhad-Moghanloo, R. and Lake, L.W. 2012. Applying Fractional-Flow Theory Under the Loss of Miscibility. SPE J.  17 (3): 661-670. SPE-129966-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/129966-PA.

Summary

This paper examines the limits of the Walsh and Lake (WL) method for predicting the displacement performance of solvent flood when miscibility is not achieved. Despite extensive research on the applications of fractional-flow theory, the prediction of flow performance under the loss of miscibility has not been investigated thoroughly.

We introduce the idea of an analogous first-contact miscible (FCM) flood to study miscibly degraded simultaneous water and gas (SWAG) displacements using the WL method. Furthermore, numerical simulation is used to validate the WL solution on one oil/solvent pair. In the simulations, the loss of miscibility (degradation) is attributed to either flow-associated dispersion or insufficient pressure to develop the miscibility.

1D SWAG injection simulations suggest that results of the WL method and the simulations are consistent when dispersion is limited. For the 2D displacements, the predicted optimal water-alternating-gas (WAG) ratio is accurate when the permeable medium is fairly homogeneous with a limited crossflow or is heterogeneous with a large lateral correlation length (the same size or greater than the interwell spacing).

The results suggest that the accuracy of the WL method improves as crossflow is reduced. In addition, linear growth of the mixing zone with time is observed in cases for which the predicted optimal WAG ratio is consistent with the simulation results. Hence, we conclude that the WL solution is accurate when the mixing zone grows linearly with time.

View full textPDF ( 5,857 KB )

History

  • Original manuscript received: 10 March 2010
  • Meeting paper published: 25 April 2010
  • Revised manuscript received: 24 December 2011
  • Manuscript approved: 10 January 2012
  • Published online: 27 June 2012
  • Version of record: 12 September 2012