SPE Journal
Volume 18,
Number 2,
April 2013,
pp. 309-318
Summary
Formation damage of oil reservoirs as a result of fines migration is a major
reason for productivity decline. Formation fines are defined as unconfined
solid particles present in the pore spaces of formations. Their migration,
caused by fluid flow in the reservoir, can cause pore plugging and permeability
reduction. In the last 3 decades, many studies have characterized fines and
their migration effect on permeability reduction. There are many techniques in
the industry to remediate the damage, especially in the near-wellbore region.
Nanofluids (NFs) that contain nanoparticles (NPs) exhibit specific properties,
including a high tendency for adsorption and being good candidates for
injection into the nearwellbore region, because of the small nanoparticle
sizes. In this paper, a packed column is used to study the use of different
types of NPs to reduce fines migration in synthetic porous materials. Three
types of NPs--MgO, SiO2, and Al2O3--are used
here to investigate their effects on fines movement. The results indicate that
fines may adhere to the matrix grains, hindering their migration, when the
porous materials are soaked with NFs. Furthermore, to check the mechanisms of
this remediation technique, the effect of nanoparticle concentration and fluid
flow rates in the medium on fines detachment was studied. A theoretical model
was used to calculate total energy of interaction for the surfaces to check
experimental results, which was also validated with scanning electron
microscopy (SEM) pictures for samples from synthetic cores. The results showed
that addition of 0.1 wt% of MgO and SiO2 NPs reduced fines migration
by 15% compared with the reference state. MgO NPs were found to be more
effective, even at high fluid rates, when used at a higher concentration, as
noticed in the macroscopic and microscopic results.
© 2012. Society of Petroleum Engineers
View full textPDF
(
984 KB
)
History
- Original manuscript received:
27 July 2011
- Meeting paper published:
7 June 2011
- Revised manuscript received:
23 May 2012
- Manuscript approved:
15 July 2012
- Published online:
27 November 2012
- Version of record:
5 April 2013