Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology
Volume 48, Number 11, November 2009, 21-26

Abstract

Slotted liners are used extensively in the majority of steam assisted gravity drainage (SAGD) operations conducted in Western Canada due to their superior mechanical strength and integrity in contrast to other mechanical sand-control devices. These liners are required because of the generally poorly or unconsolidated nature of the majority of formations in which SAGD applications are conducted. These liners can have a variety of configurations with varying slot density, slotting patterns, slot apertures and slot internal geometries. The overall objective of a successful slotted liner design is to ensure that the liner allows the maximum production of bitumen and other fluids with a minimum pressure drop, while retaining the majority of the formation sand and preventing infill of the horizontal section of the well with solids and erosion and failure of downhole pumps and surface equipment. This paper describes a detailed lab test protocol which was successfully developed over a number years for the design and evaluation of slot geometry for SAGD applications, describes test procedures used and quantifies some of the major mechanisms discovered that lead to the plugging of slots. It has been found that in addition to grain size of the sand under consideration and slot geometry, that clay content of the formation, flow velocity, wetting phase type and pH play crucial roles in the plugging mechanism of slotted liners. Clay plugging at the top portion of the slots has been found to be the dominant damage mechanism.

Introduction

SAGD is being used extensively in Western Canada and other areas in the world as an effective and economic means for the recovery of heavy oil and bitumen reserves and represents the current primary technology for the exploitation of this large hydrocarbon resource(1–5).

© 2009. Society of Petroleum Engineers

View full textPDF ( 915 KB )

History

• Original manuscript received: 31 March 2008
• Meeting paper published: 17 June 2008
• Revised manuscript received: 12 August 2009
• Manuscript approved: 23 September 2009