Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology
Volume 49,
Number 12,
December 2010,
pp. 49-56
Summary
It has been long believed that the viscoelasticity of polymer solution
improves the displacement efficiency in polymer flood operations, but the
individual effect of elasticity has not been clearly distilled for a single
viscoelastic polymer. In this study, the effect of elasticity of polymer-based
fluids on the microscopic sweep efficiency is investigated by injecting two
polymer solutions with similar shear viscosity, but significantly different
elastic characteristics.
Blends of various grades of polyethylene oxide (PEO) with similar average
molecular weight and different molecular weight distribution (MWD) were
prepared by dissolving in deionized water. The polymer solutions exhibited
identical shear viscosity, but different elasticity. A series of experiments
were performed by injecting the polymer solutions through a sandpack saturated
with mineral oil. The experiments were performed using a special core holder
designed to simulate radial flow. Injection was done through a perforated
injection line located at the centre of the cell and fluids were produced
through two production lines located at the periphery. The experiments were
conducted within a shear rate range of field applications. Because both polymer
solutions had similar shear viscosity behaviour, but different elastic
properties, it was possible to see the effect of elasticity on the sweep
efficiency alone.
Results of the polymer flooding experiments indicated that the sweep
efficiency of a polymeric fluid could be effectively improved by adjusting the
MWD of the solution at constant shear viscosity and polymer concentration. The
polymer solution with higher elasticity exhibited considerably higher
resistance to flow through porous media than the one with lower elasticity,
resulting in higher sweep efficiency and lower residual oil saturation.
© 2010. Society of Petroleum Engineers
View full textPDF
(
937 KB
)
History
- Original manuscript received:
29 March 2010
- Meeting paper published:
26 May 2010
- Revised manuscript received:
22 September 2010
- Manuscript approved:
30 September 2010
- Published online:
1 December 2010
- Version of record:
1 December 2010