Summary
Steam-assisted gravity drainage (SAGD) is a commercially successful
bitumen-recovery method that has transformed some of the vast Canadian oil-sand
deposits into recoverable reserves. Several SAGD projects have been developed
in northern Alberta in the past few years, and many more are in the planning
stages. As the projects mature, new operational problems are revealed,
demanding new solutions. Because of operational restrictions, it is almost
impossible to have the same growth rate in all steam chambers in a SAGD
pattern. Hence, interference between a mature chamber and an adjoining immature
chamber can become a problem. Steam leakage from the immature chamber into the
mature chamber reduces the thermal efficiency of the project and requires a
solution to prevent the steam dissipation.
Filling the mature chamber with combustion gases is a possible solution for
this problem. Carrying out in-situ combustion (ISC) in the mature chamber not
only would create the needed combustion gases in the chamber, but also could
recover a substantial part of the residual oil in the mature chamber. It is
also likely that the combustion would create a reduced-permeability coke
(toluene insoluble fraction) zone around the mature chamber, thus isolating it
from the rest of the reservoir.
To evaluate the merit of this idea, an elevated-pressure experiment was
conducted using a 2D physical model. The conventional SAGD process was
conducted in the model to develop a steam chamber. Air was then injected
through a horizontal well near the top of the model into the SAGD chamber, and
a combustion front was established around the air-injection well. By operating
combustion in the depleted chamber, residual oil was mobilized and produced.
Additional oil recovery was attained by more than 20% over the SAGD operation
as a bonus. Initiation and propagation of combustion were confirmed by a large
increase in the temperature in the combustion zone. After unpacking the model,
it was found that a coke layer formed around the perimeter of the chamber.
© 2011. Society of Petroleum Engineers
View full textPDF
(
1,959 KB
)
History
- Original manuscript received:
17 September 2010
- Meeting paper published:
20 October 2010
- Revised manuscript received:
23 January 2011
- Manuscript approved:
28 January 2011
- Published online:
29 March 2011
- Version of record:
1 April 2011