Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology
Volume 49, Number 9, September 2010, pp. 42-55

SPE-140338-PA

Numerical Evaluation of Hydrocarbon Additives to Steam in the SAGD Process

View full textPDF ( 3,804 KB )

DOI  More information 10.2118/140338-PA http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/140338-PA

Citation

  • Hosseininejad Mohebati, M., Maini, B.B., and Harding, T.G. 2010. Numerical Evaluation of Hydrocarbon Additives to Steam in the SAGD Process. J Can Pet Technol  49 (9): 42-55. SPE-140338-PA. doi: 10.2118/140338-PA.

Discipline Categories

  • 6.4.9 Steam-Assisted Gravity Drainage (SAGD)
  • 5.5 Oilfield Chemistry

Keywords

  • heavy oil and bitumen, SAGD, solvent additives, noncondensable additives

Summary

Heavy oil and bitumen are expected to become increasingly important sources of fuel in the coming decades. Steam assisted gravity drainage (SAGD) is a commercially viable and widely used recovery technique for heavy oil and bitumen. However, it remains an expensive technique and requires large energy input in the form of steam. Energy intensity of SAGD, as well as environmental concerns such as fresh water usage and CO2 emission, make it imperative to find new oil extraction technologies. Coinjecting a hydrocarbon additive with steam offers the potential of higher oil rates and recoveries with lower energy and water consumption.

A reservoir simulation study using a 20X12X15 3D Cartesian model and Athabasca fluid and reservoir properties was conducted to evaluate this process. The role of hydrocarbon additive in the steam chamber and its effect on the performance of SAGD was investigated.

Simulation results revealed the parameters that will have the greatest impact on the process performance and indicated the effectiveness of each hydrocarbon additive in improving the performance of SAGD. The results also showed that selecting the most suitable hydrocarbon additive depends on the operating conditions as well as the original reservoir fluid composition.

View full textPDF ( 3,804 KB )

History

  • Original manuscript received: 16 October 2009
  • Meeting paper published: 17 June 2009
  • Revised manuscript received: 20 May 2010
  • Manuscript approved: 24 June 2010
  • Published online: 1 September 2010
  • Version of record: 1 September 2010