Summary
A numerical fully implicit nonisothermal wellbore/reservoir simulator is
developed. The model entails simultaneous solution of transient coupled mass-,
momentum-, and energy-balance equations within the wellbore; energy-balance
equations for the tubular and cement materials and the formation surrounding
the wellbore; and mass-balance and flow-rate/pressure equations for the
reservoir formation. A wellbore heat-loss model that is a strong feature of
this study is developed and employed in the model to improve the accuracy of
the simulator and to be able to estimate the casing temperature and
formation-temperature distribution. The model formulation is completed with an
equation of state (EOS) to estimate fluid properties and appropriate
friction-factor correlations in the wellbore tubing to compute the frictional
pressure drop for different flow regimes.
The developed model has several applications in the petroleum industry,
particularly in the gas-well testing design and interpretation of both
isothermal and nonisothermal gas reservoirs.
This nonisothermal simulator is validated through comparisons to both
analytical models and an equivalent numerical isothermal coupled
wellbore/reservoir simulator that is also developed in this paper. Applications
of this simulator to analyzing gas-well testing problems, in addition to
several important observations, are extensively studied in Part 2 of this
research work (Bahonar et al. 2010).
Currently, it has been well accepted that the applicability and significance
of a reservoir simulator depend on the behaviour of the wellbore and
interaction between the wellbore and reservoir. A robust, accurate coupled
wellbore and reservoir simulator is an invaluable tool for the petroleum
engineer to help the petroleum industry understand production behaviour, make a
meaningful prediction, and make correct decisions in all field-development and
production stages.
© 2011. Society of Petroleum Engineers
View full textPDF
(
1,411 KB
)
History
- Original manuscript received:
21 September 2010
- Revised manuscript received:
8 March 2011
- Manuscript approved:
4 May 2011
- Version of record:
13 September 2011