Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology
Volume 51, Number 3, May 2012, pp. 193-197

SPE-150820-PA

Determination of Biot's Effective-Stress Coefficient for Permeability of Nikanassin Sandstone

View full textPDF ( 784 KB )

DOI  More information 10.2118/150820-PA http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/150820-PA

Citation

  • Qiao, L.P., Wong, R.C.K., Aguilera, R., and Kantzas, A. 2012. Determination of Biot’s Effective-Stress Coefficient for Permeability of Nikanassin Sandstone. J Can Pet Technol  51 (3): 193-197. SPE-150820-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/150820-PA.

Discipline Categories

  • 6.1.10 Reservoir Geomechanics
  • 6.9.3 Tight Gas
  • 5.3.3 Hydraulic Fracturing and Gravel Packing

Keywords

  • stress parameter, permeability, Biot's effective stress coefficient, tight gas formation

Summary

In Alberta and British Columbia, a huge amount of tight gas is trapped in relatively low-permeability rock formations. Physical fracturing of these formations could enhance the overall formation permeability and thus improve tight gas extraction. One of the outstanding issues in rock fracturing is to determine the magnitude of applied effective stress. The general effective-stress law is defined as σeff = σc - ασp, where σc and σp are total confining stress and fluid pore pressure, respectively. Each physical quantity of rock responds to total stress and pore pressure in a different way, and thus each quantity has its own unique Biot's effective-stress coefficient. The main objective of this study is to experimentally determine the Biot's coefficient for permeability of Nikanassin sandstone. A series of permeability measurements was conducted on Nikanassin sandstone core samples from the Lick Creek region in British Columbia under various combinations of confining stress and pore pressure. In addition, permeability values were measured both along and across bedding planes to investigate any anisotropy in the Biot's coefficient.

View full textPDF ( 784 KB )

History

  • Original manuscript received: 6 April 2009
  • Meeting paper published: 16 June 2009
  • Revised manuscript received: 30 June 2011
  • Manuscript approved: 30 June 2011
  • Published online: 27 February 2012
  • Version of record: 1 May 2012