Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology
Volume 51, Number 3, May 2012, pp. 198-204

SPE-155503-PA

Reliability and Uncertainty of Prediction of Dynamic Elastic Constants in Reservoir Rock

View full textPDF ( 3,157 KB )

DOI  More information 10.2118/155503-PA http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/155503-PA

Citation

  • Nejati, H.R., Ghazvinian, A., and Saemi, M. 2012. Reliability and Uncertainty of Prediction of Dynamic Elastic Constants in Reservoir Rock. J Can Pet Technol  51 (3): 198-204. SPE-155503-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/155503-PA.

Discipline Categories

  • 3.2 Risk Management and Decision-Making

Keywords

  • Dynamic elastic constant, reservoir rock, uncertainty, Monte Carlo simulation

Summary

The prediction of dynamic elastic constants of reservoir rocks is one of the most important aspects of petroleum engineering. In recent years, several studies have been performed for this purpose. Because of uncertainty and variability in natural materials, deterministic prediction of rock properties in the reservoir is not reasonable. The purpose of this study is to evaluate uncertainty in dynamic-elastic-constant prediction for reservoir rock. Dipole-shear-sonic-image (DSI) log data from one of the Saudi Arabian reservoirs are used to evaluate uncertainty in dynamic-elastic-property prediction. For this purpose, a multiple linear regression (MLR) is carried out to present an empirical equation for shear-wave (S-wave) velocity prediction. Then, probabilistic analysis using Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) is performed to evaluate the uncertainty and reliability in prediction of dynamic elastic constants (Young's modulus and Poisson's ratio). On the basis of the analysis, uncertainty and variability of rock elastic constants are considered, and the value of Young's modulus and Poisson's ratio in a special interval from the reservoir are determined with a certain probability. Finally, the impact of log-data parameters on the value of rock elastic constants in the reservoir interval is assessed.

View full textPDF ( 3,157 KB )

History

  • Original manuscript received: 27 May 2011
  • Revised manuscript received: 12 September 2011
  • Manuscript approved: 21 October 2011
  • Published online: 24 April 2012
  • Version of record: 1 May 2012