Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology
Volume 50, Number 9, September/October 2011, pp. 71-81

SPE-99606-PA

Comparative Evaluation of a New Gas/Oil Miscibility-Determination Technique

View full textPDF ( 675 KB )

DOI  More information 10.2118/99606-PA http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/99606-PA

Citation

  • Ayirala, S.C. and Rao, D.N. 2011. Comparative Evaluation of a New Gas-Oil Miscibility Determination Technique. J Can Pet Technol  50 (9/10): 71-81. SPE-99606-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/99606-PA.

Discipline Categories

  • 6.4.7 Miscible Methods

Keywords

  • interfacial tension, miscibility, slim tube test

Summary

A new experimental technique of vanishing interfacial tension (VIT) has been reported in recent literature for quick and cost-effective determination of gas/oil miscibility. However, this technique has been criticized because of the perceived absence of compositional-path specification and lack of confirmation against standard gas/oil systems. In this paper, we address these concerns by conducting interfacial-tension (IFT) measurements at elevated pressures and temperatures in two standard gas/oil systems and at varying molar compositions of gas and oil in feed mixtures.

Though gas/oil ratio was found to have an impact on mass-transfer rates, the IFT between gas and oil was unaffected in the two standard gas/oil systems as the fluid phases approached equilibrium. This indicates compositional-path independence of gas/oil IFTs measured at near-equilibrium conditions; hence, miscibilities determined using the VIT technique. The minimum miscibility pressures (MMPs) determined using the VIT technique acceptably matched (within 5 to 8%) with the reported slim tube miscibilities for both the standard gas/oil systems. These experimental results clearly support wide use of the VIT technique for rapid and cost-effective determination of MMPs and minimum miscibility enrichments (MMEs) in improved-oil-recovery applications.

View full textPDF ( 675 KB )

History

  • Original manuscript received: 5 September 2008
  • Meeting paper published: 22 April 2006
  • Revised manuscript received: 24 January 2011
  • Manuscript approved: 28 January 2011
  • Version of record: 13 September 2011