Distinguished Lecturers' Slides/Graphics
Review our data policy for information about these graphics and how they may be used.
Unconventional development propelled the United States to produce more oil than it imports for the first time in 20 years. Increased production of domestic oil and gas profoundly impacted economic growth and job creation for the U.S. During this evolution, there was a need to address environmental regulations and infrastructure requirements in order to access the sheer volume of resources. Combined with today’s horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing technology, a strategic development plan can be constructed for any country to create an unconventional energy opportunity. In this lecture, the experience from U.S development is utilized to provide a fully-integrated workflow for developing shale oil and gas reservoirs from exploitation to production. Starting at the nano-scale, we will zoom into the pore structure to understand the storage and flow paths. Transitioning to the reservoir-scale, well testing and microseismic are utilized to define the flow capacity and estimate the stimulated volume. Learnings from this subsurface characterization is used to guide well completion, flowback, and production operations. The diagnostic methodology specific to each operation can be applied to identify geologically favorable areas and the best completion practice. As development progresses, opportunities to improve recovery can be magnified through optimum well spacing and refracturing. As a final step in the development, determining an appropriate enhanced recovery method is essential to access the remaining resources. Finally, example development scenarios are provided to demonstrate how a technically driven strategy is more effective to maximize value and make the unconventional revolution a global one
Basak Kurtoglu is Vice President in the Global Energy Group of Citigroup Investment Bank. Prior to Citi, she was Integrated Project Team Manager at Marathon Oil. She has been instrumental in assimilating multiple disciplines to evaluate and develop unconventional reservoirs. Kurtoglu earned her BS from Middle East Technical University, and her MS and PhD in petroleum engineering from Colorado School of Mines. Her numerous publications range from pore to reservoir scale analyses of unconventional reservoirs with an emphasis on enhancing oil recovery. She serves on the SPE Forum Series Coordinating Committee and the SPE Reservoir Description and Dynamics Advisory Committee.
The uses of automation in the drilling process are expanding and are typically resulting in improved drilling performance. However, many of these projects struggle in the initial stages, often trying to overcome a common set of
hurdles. Many of these hurdles are not technical challenges, but instead are related to people issues and the methods for implementing the solutions. This presentation covers the basics of drilling automation and describes the problems
and solutions that have been found to improve the startup success for drilling automation.
IDEA TO TAKE AWAY - For automation to be successful, the key users, especially the driller, must be involved in every step of design and implementation.
Bill Koederitz is Chief Technology Officer at GK Plus Innovations. Previously, Bill spent 20 years building real-time applications and drilling automation systems at National Oilwell Varco. Prior to that, Bill worked as a drilling engineer and as a university researcher. He holds BS, MS, and PhD degrees in Petroleum Engineering from Louisiana State University and is a Registered Petroleum Engineer in Texas. He has authored or coauthored 25 technical papers and holds 15 patents.
The Completion Engineer integrates the requirements of a number of other disciplines (Reservoir, Drilling, Production, etc) to maximize the value of a hydrocarbon resource. This almost always requires evaluating competing and conflicting factors to determine the 'best' option for a particular problem. This talk will demonstrate a decision making process that allows the stakeholders to compare various options in a fair and roboust way. Two real onshore or offshore examples will be reviewed depending on SPE chapter interest. Members will take away a new methodology on how to compare competing factors that influence a completion or well design.
Mr. Dan Gibson is a Senior Completions and Well Integrity engineer with over 35 years of experience. He has worked his way through the oil and gas production stream from Facilities and Production engineering to Completions in assignments across the USA and around the world (Gabon, Congo, Egypt, Scotland, Russia, and Australia). This breadth of experience comes across in the presentation and his ability to deal with different audiences with a wide range of challenges. He has authored or co-authored a number of papers ranging from polymer flood management to ice mechanics and most recently an innovative ICD system. He is one of the most active members of SPE Connect where members can readily contact him with questions.
The weakness of reservoir simulations is the lack of quantity and quality of the required input; their strength is the ability to vary one parameter at a time. Therefore, reservoir simulations are an appropriate tool to evaluate
relative uncertainty but absolute forecasts can be misleading, leading to poor business decisions. As recovery processes increase in complexity, the impact of such decisions may have a major impact on the project viability. A
responsible use of reservoir simulations is discussed, addressing both technical users and decision makers. The danger of creating a false confidence in forecasts and the value of simulating complex processes are demonstrated with
examples. This is a call for the return of the reservoir engineer who is in control of the simulations and not controlled by them, and the decision maker who appreciates a black & white graph of a forecast with realistic uncertainties
over a 3-D hologram in colour.
Daniel Yang is a Petroleum Advisor at Shell Canada. Holding a PhD in Geophysics from the Technical University of Berlin, Germany, he dedicated 15 years of his oil-industry career to Enhanced Oil Recovery methods, focussing on thermal recovery and originating from 10 years of research in geothermal energy. Daniel worked at Shell International, Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. and Laricina Energy Ltd. He holds two patents, was recongnized as Subject Matter Expert in Shell, has over 20 publications, recently received an SPE Best Paper Award, and was a guest lecturer at universities in Germany, U.S.A and Canada.
Reservoir simulation is a sophisticated technique of forecasting future recoverable volumes and production rates that is becoming commonplace in the management and development of oil and gas reservoirs, small and large. Calculation and estimation of reserves continues to be a necessary process to properly assess the value and manage the development of an oil and gas producer’s assets. These methods of analysis, while generally done for different purposes, require knowledge and expertise by the analyst (typically a reservoir engineer) to arrive at meaningful and reliable results. Increasingly, the simulation tool is being incorporated into the reserves process. However, as with any reservoir engineering technique, certain precautions must be taken when relying on reservoir simulation as the means for estimating reserves. This discussion highlights some of the important facets one should consider when applying numerical simulation methods to use for, or augment, reserves estimates. The main take away will be an appreciation for the areas to focus on to arrive at meaningful and defendable estimates of reserves that are based on reservoir models.
Dean C. Rietz, P.E., President and member of the board of directors at Ryder Scott Company, has over 30 years of diverse experience in evaluating oil and gas properties, including more than 25 years applying numerical modeling approaches to these evaluations. Prior to his current position, he managed the Ryder Scott Reservoir Simulation Group for approximately 15 years. Before joining Ryder Scott in 1995, Rietz worked at Chevron, Gruy, and Intera. He received a B.S.P.E. degree from the University of Oklahoma and an M.S.P.E. degree from the University of Houston. His past teaching experience includes in-house material balance schools at Chevron and Eclipse user courses at Intera. Currently, Rietz teaches a two-day SPE simulation course and is an adjunct professor of reservoir simulation at the University of Houston. Rietz has published various papers related to reservoir modeling, including its application to reserves reporting. Rietz is a registered professional engineer in Texas and serves on the Petroleum Engineering Advisory Board for the University of Houston.
As we have seen with the advent of the shale oil revolution in the United States, the development of new technology plays an important role in the oil and gas industry. It’s an enabler in reducing capital costs, simplifying production
and increasing capacity of new or existing facilities. It can make a marginal project into a profitable development.
Progressing technology, while dealing with significant risk, is a challenge that can be overcome through a technology qualification process. A Technology Qualification Program (TQP) provides a means to identifying the risks and taking the correct steps to mitigate it; not avoid it.
This lecture summarizes the required steps involved in qualifying technology and how to keep track of technology development through the Technology Readiness Level (TRL) ranking system. In addition, some of the pitfalls in executing a TQP program are identified and discussed with emphasis on both component and system testing. Examples are given to illustrate the danger in taking shortcuts when executing the qualification plan.
Data from a recent subsea separation qualification program is presented comparing test results between CFDs, model fluid and actual crude testing at operating conditions. Knowing the limitations of the tools and testing system selected is an important step in closing the gaps identified in the TQP program.
The TRL has evolved at a faster pace and has become more acceptable in the oil and gas industry then the TQP. Nonetheless, continued standardization of both the TQP and TRL is still necessary in order to reduce overall cost of developing technology and allow faster implementation.
Ed Grave Ed Grave graduated from New Jersey Institute of Technology with a Master of Science in 1982. Ed started his career at Lummus working on a number of petrochemical projects, in which in gravitated towards
mass transfer and separations. He later joined Mobil Research & Development Company in 1990 as a mass transfer specialist. Today Ed is ExxonMobil’s Upstream Senior Technical Advisor for Fractionation & Separation at ExxonMobil Upstream
Research Company in Spring, TX. His team is responsible for research, design, and troubleshooting, for all fractionating & separation systems for the entire ExxonMobil Upstream organization
Ed is recognized for his expertise and as a leader within ExxonMobil in advancing new technology. He also led the effort in designing and qualifying separation system for ultra-deep water, making ExxonMobil ready to meet their future needs.
He initiated and is presently guiding the joint industry Separations Technology Research (STAR) Program on qualifying separation equipment as technical chairman. He also served as vice-chair at SPE’s Separation Technology Technical Section (STTS).
Developing sound energy policies is difficult under the best circumstances. There is a delicate balance between government's need for revenue, modern society's need for energy and the producer's need for profitability to exploit resources. Many factors can affect the results for all interested parties. Good policies require an appreciation for the interactions among oilfield development and operations, costs and prices, government taxes and regulations and many other factors that are often difficult to define accurately. We live in a complex world that acts like a system with many interconnected components. Humans are ill equipped to understand its behavior. We instinctively focus on short term, local issues and simple cause and effect rather than the bigger picture. This reduces the likelihood that we can design effective policies that will work well over the long term for all stakeholders. There are no easy solutions in complex systems. We developed an approach using system models and regret analysis to find flexible and resilient tax policies, in spite of uncertainties, that would provide all parties with fair, profitable solutions – even though none might achieve their maximum goals. It can also measure the relative benefits of existing energy policies and, potentially, help to improve them. These challenges will only become harder in the future and more important for the energy industry. Now is the time to pursue new ways of thinking to solve these problems.
Frank Blaskovich is Vice-President of Blaskovich Services, Inc. in Northern California. He received his B.S. in aerospace engineering from the University of Notre Dame. He has more than 40 years of experience in reservoir engineering and simulation, software development, environmental modeling, and policy analysis. He has worked on energy issues around the world for the largest multi-national energy companies, government agencies and major consulting firms. He has published numerous papers on reservoir simulation and energy policy analysis available in the SPE literature and elsewhere. His work and research activities over the last decade have focused on developing improved energy policies that can benefit all stakeholders fairly.
Collaborative Working helps assets to operate more efficiently and as one team, resulting in higher production, less cost, lower HSE exposure and higher morale. Shell has pursued the Digital Oilfield for the last fifteen years, under the heading of Smart Fields. Collaborative Work Environments (CWEs) were implemented in the majority of assets, live environments now cover over 60% of Shell’s production. The presentation will provide an overview of current Collaborative Work Environments. It will show examples of CWEs in different types of assets, and of the business value achieved. The large scale implementation was achieved through a structured deployment programme, taking assets and projects through a standard design, implementation and embedding approach. To embed and sustain the new ways of working, a focus on the people aspects and change management has been critical. Each project included process design, awareness and training sessions and establishing coaches, support and continuous improvement.
Frans van den Berg is currently an independent consultant in the design of Digital Oilfields and Collaborative Work Environments. He has worked 32 years in Shell, lastly in its global Smart Fields or Digital Oilfield program in the technology organisation in the Netherlands. There he led the global implementation of Collaborative Work Environments in Shell. He has held various positions as a petroleum engineer, head of petrohysics and asset development leader in operational roles and in global technology deployment. He worked ten years in Malaysia and Thailand. Frans has a PhD and a Master in Physics from Leiden University in the Netherlands. He has been involved in the organisation of the SPE Intelligent Energy and Digital Energy Conferences since 2008.
Seismic attributes are being used more and more often in the reservoir characterization and interpretation processes. The new software and computer’s development allows today to generate a large number of surface and volume attributes. They proved to be very useful for the facies and reservoir properties distribution in the geological models, helping to improve their quality in the areas between the wells and areas without wells. The seismic attributes can help to better understand the stratigraphic and structural features, the sedimentation processes, lithology variations, etc. By improving the static geological models, the dynamic models are also improved, helping to better understand the reservoirs’ behavior during exploitation. As a result, the estimation of the recoverable hydrocarbon volumes becomes more reliable and the development strategies will become more successful.
Isabela Falk is a Senior Geologist, currently the Subsurface Team Leader in a Schlumberger P&AM project in Romania. Previously she worked as a Project Geoscientist for Fugro-Jason in Germany and Holland. Prior to that, she worked as a Researcher Geologist in the Romanian National Gas Company: Romgaz. Isabela holds a PhD in Geology from the University Babes-Bolyai from Cluj-Napoca, Romania, since 2008. She has 20 years of experience in the Oil& Gas industry, specialized mostly in geological modeling, but is experienced also in seismic inversion. She made several scientific presentations in internal and international conferences and is a member of SPE, SEG and EAGE.
Heavy Oil recovery traditionally starts with depletion drive and (natural) waterdrive with very low recoveries as a result. As EOR technique, steam injection has been matured since the 1950s using CSS (cyclic steam stimulation), steam drive or steam flooding, and SAGD (steam assisted gravity drainage). The high energy cost of heating up the oil bearing formation to steam temperature and the associated high CO2 footprint make steam based technology less attractive today and many companies in the industry have been actively trying to find alternatives or improvements. As a result there are now many more energy efficient recovery technologies that can unlock heavy oil resources compared with only a decade ago. This presentation will discuss breakthrough alternatives to steam based recovery as well as incremental improvement options to steam injection techniques. The key message is the importance to consider these techniques because steam injection is costly and has a high CO2 footprint
Johan van Dorp holds an MSc in Experimental Physics from Utrecht University and joined Shell in 1981. He has served on several international assignments, mainly in petroleum and reservoir engineering roles. He recently led the extra heavy-oil research team at the Shell Technology Centre in Calgary, focusing on improved in-situ heavy-oil recovery technologies. Van Dorp also was Shell Group Principal Technical Expert in Thermal EOR and has been involved with most thermal projects in Shell throughout the world, including in California, Oman, the Netherlands, and Canada. He retired from Shell after more than 35 years in Oct 2016. Van Dorp (co-)authored 13 SPE papers on diverse subjects.
Drilling systems automation is the real-time reliance on digital technology in creating a wellbore. It encompasses downhole tools and systems, surface drilling equipment, remote monitoring and the use of models and simulations while drilling. While its scope is large, its potential benefits are impressive, among them: fewer workers exposed to rig-floor hazards, the ability to realize repeatable performance drilling, and lower drilling risk. While drilling systems automation includes new drilling technology, it is most importantly a collaborative infrastructure for performance drilling. In 2008, a small group of engineers and scientists attending an SPE conference noted that automation was becoming a key topic in drilling and they formed a technical section to investigate it further. By 2015, the group reached a membership of sixteen hundred as the technology rapidly gaining acceptance. Why so much interest? The benefits and promises of an automated approach to drilling address the safety and fundamental economics of drilling. What will it take? Among the answers are an open collaborative digital environment at the wellsite, an openness of mind to digital technologies, and modified or new business practices. What are the barriers? The primary barrier is a lack of understanding and a fear of automation. When will it happen? It is happening now. Digital technologies are transforming the infrastructure of the drilling industry. Drilling systems automation uses this infrastructure to deliver safety and performance, and address cost.
John Macpherson is a Senior Technical Advisor for Baker Hughes. He holds a BSc (Hons) in Geology from the University of Glasgow. During his 40 years in the oil industry, he has participated in exploratory drilling operations -- primarily in remote areas of South America -- and in various positions in drilling research and development. His focus has been on exploration and drilling: starting with geology, through geomechanics, drilling modeling, to drilling dynamics and drilling systems automation. He has published about 40 papers, and has more than 25 granted patents. He is the Chairman of the SPE Drilling Systems Automation Technical Section (2014 and 2015), and a member of the Drilling Systems Automation Roadmap initiative. He is a member of the JPT editorial committee.
Adoption of the applied surface-backpressure types of managed pressure drilling (MPD) technologies in deepwater have mainly involved the use of a rotating control device (RCD). The RCD creates a closed drilling system in which the flow out of the well is diverted towards an automated MPD choke manifold (with a high-resolution mass flow meter) that aside from regulating backpressure also increases sensitivity and reduces reaction time to kicks, losses, and other unwanted drilling events. This integration of MPD equipment into floating drilling rigs to provide them with MPD capabilities, including the capacity to perform pressurized mud cap drilling (PMCD) and riser gas mitigation (RGM), has produced improvements not only in drillability and efficiency, but most importantly in process safety. Case histories on how MPD has performed will be presented on the following: • allowed drilling to reach target depth in rank wildcat deepwater wells that have formations prone to severe circulation losses and narrow mud weight windows; • increased drilling efficiency by minimizing non-productive time associated with downhole pressure-related problems and by allowing for the setting of deeper casing seats; • enhanced operational and process safety by allowing for immediate detection of kicks, losses and other critical downhole events. • provided riser gas mitigation capabilities that can detect a gas influx once it enters the drilling fluid stream, and not after it has already broken out above the rig blow-out preventers (BOPs).
Julmar Shaun Sadicon Toralde is the Global Champion for Deepwater Managed Pressure Drilling (MPD), Downhole Deployment Valve (DDV) and SteadyState Continuous Flow System technologies, based in Houston, Texas, USA. He helped pioneer deepwater MPD deployment on a dynamically positioned drillship in 2010 and is actively involved in major deepwater MPD rig integration projects globally. Shaun is from the Philippines and holds a Geothermal Engineering degree from Negros Oriental State University, where he taught and conducted research on energy engineering. He previously held various field and office management positions with Weatherford in the Asia Pacific region. He has 50 technical papers / trade articles and various MPD training courses to his name.
Integrated reservoir modelling (IRM) is a best practice in the Upstream industry applied throughout all life cycles stages of oil and gas projects aiming at characterisation of subsurface reservoirs and optimisation of field development phases. In this respect, carbonate and clastic reservoirs are different in a range of aspects which will be highlighted. During the past 25 years, major steps in technology development have proven the importance of IRM as a key subsurface contributor to Upstream projects. A brief history of IRM through time will be provided using carbonate examples from exploration, development up to recent learnings around unconventional hydrocarbon trapping. More importantly, these industry showcases will be used to introduce present-day challenges around IRM in the Upstream business. Despite the significant progress in modelling technologies, root causes for disappointing results of such studies are limitations in software tools and workflows together with the lack of integration. This often causes poor project delivery. Such pitfalls within existing practices in the Upstream industry will be discussed highlighting that tools only are not able to assure success in subsurface reservoir characterisation projects. Finally, an outlook into the future of hydrocarbon development planning and IRM will be provided. Ultimately, end-to-end integration in Upstream project workflows requires focus on associated business decisions, scaling of models and scenario management supported by content and context based data management as well as capabilities around fast iterative feedback loops. Only the combined improvements around tools, processes and people will maximise value for Upstream project delivery.
Jürgen Grötsch is currently Global Learning Advisor Geology at Shell responsible for design and deployment of advanced training programs. In this position, his focus areas are integration and building capabilities around decision based subsurface modelling for muilti-disciplinary teams which he was involved with for the past 25 years in various assignments within Shell Production and Exploration ventures around the world. Jürgen holds a Ph.D. in carbonate sedimentology and has authored and co-authored numerous publications and books. He is known as keynote lecturer from international geoscience conferences and, since 2009, as visiting lecturer at the GeoZentrum of the Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg in Germany. Currently, he is Vice-President of the German Geological Society (DGGV).
We are all familiar with the production systems through which reservoir fluids flow to reach our processing facilities. This is a journey characterized by complex multiphase flow phenomena that govern pressure and temperature changes along the way. A monumental amount of research and development work has been invested towards better understanding multiphase flow behavior over the past fifty years. Yet, many challenges remain as we strive to optimize ever more complex production systems fraught with difficult flow assurance issues. Just how good is the science? And more importantly, how does this impact our bottom line? This lecture will discuss key concepts of multiphase flow leading to the current “state-of-the-art” models used today. Looking towards the future, the science must be advanced to address areas of greatest uncertainty and align with trends in field development strategies. Recommendations will be presented covering the top 5 areas of research necessary for these purposes. The economic impact of multiphase operations will be illustrated using two examples that provide insight towards maximizing asset value.
Mack Shippen is a Principal Engineer with Schlumberger in Houston, where he is responsible for the global business of the PIPESIM multiphase flow simulation software. He has extensive experience in well and network simulation studies, ranging from flow assurance to dynamic coupling of reservoir and surface simulation models. He has served on a number of SPE committees and chaired the SPE Reprint Series on Offshore Multiphase Production Operations. He holds BS and MS degrees in Petroleum Engineering from Texas A&M University, where his research focused on multiphase flow modelling.
Microfracturing is an excellent method of obtaining direct stress measurements, not only in shales, but in conventional reservoirs as well. Recent advances have shown that microfracturing can help improve reservoir management by guiding well placement, completion design, and perforation strategy. Microfracturing consists of isolating small test intervals in a well between inflatable packers, increasing the pressure until a small fracture forms and then by conducting a few injection and shut-in cycles, extend the fracture beyond the influence of the wellbore. Results show that direct stress measurements can be successfully acquired at multiple intervals in a few hours and the vertical scale nearly corresponds to electric log resolution. Therefore, microfracture testing (generally performed in a pilot / vertical well) is an appropriate choice for calibrating log derived geomechanical models and obtaining a complete, accurate, and precise vertical stress profile. This talk describes the microfracturing process and presents several examples that led to increased hydrocarbon recovery by efficient stimulation and/or completion design. Case studies presented range from optimizing hydraulic fracturing in unconventionals, determining safe waterflood injection rates in brownfields, and improving perforation placement in ultra deepwater reservoirs.
Mayank Malik is the Global Formation Testing Expert in Chevron's Energy Technology Company and is a champion for advancing research on microfracturing. He holds a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Delhi College of Engineering (India), MS in Mechanical Engineering from University of Toronto (Canada), and Ph.D. in Petroleum Engineering from The University of Texas at Austin (USA). Malik has authored numerous papers on petrophysics, formation testing, and microfracturing. He is currently serving on the SPE ATCE Formation Evaluation committee and is also the Chairman for SPWLA Formation Testing Special Interest Group.
Much is now made about “Stress Shadows” and their impact on hydraulic fracturing - particularly in multi-stage horizontal laterals commonly used in Unconventionals. Unfortunately, there is no standard definition of Stress Shadows and, as a result, there is much confusion over what they are and aren’t, and, most importantly, why they can have a significant impact on hydraulic fracturing operations. The goal of this presentation will be to address this confusion and more fully explain Stress Shadows and their impact. The creation of hydraulic fracture width during a stimulation generates a change in the stress field, which alters all three principal stresses as well as tip shear stresses. These stress changes are the Stress Shadows. As hydraulic fracture propagation is often controlled by the stress field, Stress Shadows may change the propagation path for subsequent hydraulic fractures or, as seen in cluster fracturing, propagation may be impeded completely. The presence of natural fractures and weakness planes can also affect, and be affected by, Stress Shadows. At the hydraulic fracture tip, shear stresses are generated that offer the potential to shear and open closed natural fractures and weak planes – and if opened, it may be possible to stimulate them. Equally important, behind the hydraulic fracture tip Stress Shadows increase the magnitude of all three principal stresses, which tends to close weakness planes making them more difficult to stimulate. Because of these effects and others, understanding and designing for the impact of Stress Shadows is often critical for stimulation optimization.
Dr. Neal Nagel is currently Chief Engineer for OilField Geomechanics and has nearly 30 years of industry experience. He is a well-known expert in the geomechanics of Unconventionals and has given many invited SPE, AAPG, HGS, SEG, and SPWLA presentations. Nagel has also authored or coauthored more than 50 technical papers, with 20+ related to Unconventionals, including a keynote presentation at the 2014 SPE HFTC. He is a past SPE Distinguished Lecturer, was chief editor of the 2010 SPE Monograph on Solids Injection, has served on the SPE Drilling and Completions Committee, and also been a local SPE section officer.
Each year, companies use averaged well production (type wells) to support billion dollar expenditures to buy and develop oil and gas resources. These type wells often have unrepresentative rate-time profiles and recoveries over-stated by as much as 50%. These intolerable errors result from common, but incorrect, assumptions in constructing type well production profiles, and the selection and weighting of analog wells. Literature related to constructing type wells is sparse and incomplete. This lecture will fill that gap and lead participants to informed decisions for best practices in type well construction. Hind casting examples show that only small errors in recovery result when the type well construction combines historical and predicted production rates. This improvement results from using educated estimates (not intrinsic values) for months with no data to average, and from individual well forecast errors that offset one another. A Monte Carlo method incorporates risk and leads to better well selection and weighting factors, achieving more representative rate-time profiles. The recommended methodology incorporates aggregation and choosing different uncertain parameters. Parameter choice is important because it makes little sense to risk recovery (e.g., P90 for proved reserves) when the application demands a different parameter such as present value. Type well construction methods are common, but they have errors that are difficult to detect. Evaluators are likely using type wells for financial analysis, facility design, cash flow prediction, reserve estimation and debt financing without knowledge of the inaccuracies and options to improve accuracy.
Randy Freeborn is a subject matter expert in the field of empirical forecasting, type wells and related technology. Currently, he is Chief Research Engineer at Energy Navigator where he is responsible for identifying and inventing engineering technology for inclusion in the company’s reserve management software. He has been a professional engineer for 44 years and is a member of SPEE and SPE. Freeborn has prepared numerous technical papers for presentation at conferences, workshops and industry meetings. He has given guest lectures at the University of Houston and Texas A&M, and has been called as an expert witness.
The oil and gas industry places great reliance on layers-of-defenses, or barrier thinking, to protect against process safety incidents. Human performance continues to be the single most widely relied on barrier: whether as a defense in its own right, or in implementing, inspecting, maintaining and supporting engineered defenses. Human error, in its many forms, also continues to be a significant threat to the reliability of engineered and organizational defenses. While approaches to developing and assuring layers of defenses strategies have become increasingly formalized and rigorous in recent years, many organizations struggle to know how to ensure the human defenses they rely on are as robust as they reasonably can be when those strategies are developed and implemented. Drawing on the 2005 explosion and fire at the Buncefield fuel storage site as a case study, the presentation considers issues associated with the independence and effectiveness of human defenses. The key idea SPE members should take away from the lecture is that organizations can improve the strength of their human defenses by being clearer about exactly what it is they expect and intend of human performance to protect against threats. The presentation sets out challenges organizations can use to ensure the human defenses they rely on are as robust and reliable as they reasonably can be.
Ron McLeod holds a BSc in Psychology, an MSc in Ergonomics and a Ph.D. in Engineering and Applied Science and is Honorary Professor of Engineering Psychology at Heriot-Watt University. He has more than 30 years experience as a Human Factors specialists and was Shell’s Global Discipline Lead for Human Factors until March 2014. He has been active in organisations including the UK National Advisory Committee on Human Factors, the Process Safety Leadership Group, as well as the IOGP, SPE and CIEHF. He has published in scientific journals and has authored or contributed to numerous technical standards and best-practice guides. His first book, “Designing for Human Reliability: Human Factors Engineering in the Oil, Gas and Process Industries” was published by Elsevier in 2015.
Modern oil and gas field management is increasingly reliant on detailed and precise 3D reservoir characterisation, and timely areal monitoring. Borehole seismic techniques bridge the gap between remote surface-seismic observations and downhole reservoir evaluation: Borehole seismic data provide intrinsically higher-resolution, higher-fidelity images than surface-seismic data in the vicinity of the wellbore, and unique access to properties of seismic wavefields to enhance surface-seismic imaging. With the advent of new, operationally-efficient very large wireline receiver arrays; fiber-optic recording using Distributed Acoustic Sensing (DAS); the crosswell seismic reflection technique, and advanced seismic imaging algorithms such as Reverse Time Migration, a new wave of borehole seismic technologies is revolutionizing 3D seismic reservoir characterization and on-demand reservoir surveillance. New borehole seismic technologies are providing deeper insights into static reservoir architecture and properties, and into dynamic reservoir performance for conventional water-flood production, EOR, and CO2 sequestration – in deepwater, unconventional, full-field, and low-footprint environments. This lecture will begin by illustrating the wide range of borehole seismic solutions for reservoir characterization and monitoring, using a diverse set of current- and recent case study examples – through which the audience will gain an understanding of the appropriate use of borehole seismic techniques for field development and management. The lecture will then focus on DAS, explaining how the technique works; its capability to deliver conventional borehole seismic solutions (with key advantages over geophones); then describing DAS’s dramatic impact on field monitoring applications and business-critical decisions. New and enhanced borehole seismic techniques – especially with DAS time-lapse monitoring – are ready to deliver critical reservoir management solutions for your fields.
Steve Morice holds a PhD in Geophysics from Cambridge University, and is a Lead Geophysicist and Shell's global focal-point for well-to-seismic interpretation. With 20 years of experience in the international oil and gas industry, Steve has contributed to the fields of surface- and borehole-seismic survey design, acquisition technologies, processing/imaging techniques, and geophysical interpretation - with particular emphasis on the integration of surface- and borehole data for field development and production optimization. Steve is an author and co-author of numerous technical publications and two patents.
The lifecycle of developed fields, onshore and offshore will go through different stages of production up to the decline into late field life. Effective reservoir engineering management will lead to prolonging the life of field if a cost effective processing surface facilities strategy is put in place. Factors that lead to the decline in oil production or increase in OPEX may include increased water production, solids handling and the need for relatively higher compression requirements for gas lift. In order to maintain productivity and profitability, an effective holistic engineering approach to optimizing the process surface facilities must be utilized. The challenges of Optimizing Mature Field Production are: 1. Reservoir understanding with potential definition of additional reserves 2. Complete re-appraisal of the operability issues in the production facilities 3. Develop confidence to invest to optimize the process handling capabilities and capacity 4. Low CAPEX simplification of the surface facilities infrastructure to meet challenges 5. An implementation plan that recognizes the ‘Brownfield’ complexities 6. Selection of suitable optimum technology, configuration and training 7. Optimum upgrade plan of the facilities with minimum production losses Successful operation of mature fields and their surface facilities requires successful change management to the new operating strategy. Using a holistic approach can maximize the full potential of mature processing facilities at a manageable CAPEX and OPEX.
Dr. Wally Georgie Dr. Wally Georgie has a B.Sc degree in Chemistry, M.Sc in Polymer Technology, M.Sc in Safety Engineering and PhD in Applied Chemistry with training courses in oil and gas process engineering, production, reservoir and corrosion engineering. He has worked for over 37 years in different areas of oil and gas production facilities, including corrosion control, flow assurance, fluid separation, separator design, gas handling and produced water. He started his career in oil and gas services sector in 1978 based in the UK and working globally with different production issues then joined Statoil as senior staff engineer and later as technical advisor in the Norwegian sector of the North Sea. Working as part of operation team on oil and gas production facilities key focus areas included optimization, operation trouble-shooting, de-bottlenecking, oil water separation, slug handling, process verification, and myriad other fluid and gas handling issues. He then started working in March 1999 as a consultant globally both offshore and onshore, conventional and unconventional in the area of separation trouble shooting, operation assurance, produced water management, gas handling problems, flow assurance, system integrities and production chemistry, with emphasis in dealing with mature facilities worldwide.
Perforating is a key part in any well completion, being the link between wellbore and reservoir rock. Most think of perforating as being the act of running guns loaded with shaped charges into a well on wireline or tubing and blasting holes as deep as possible into the formation. However, techniques and models have recently evolved that clearly show that the focus should be on perforating for productivity, rather than perforating for penetration. The presentation leads the audience through the research, experiments and models that show how, today, we can maximize reservoir potential through a perforated completion. It highlights the importance of not just penetration, but also shot density and perforation clean up, as well as the need to bring the well on production without damaging new perforations. The one idea I would like the members to take away from this lecture is that they should take care of how they perforate their wells and use the techniques available or risk losing thousands of barrels of production. These techniques apply to new wells, old wells and also help delay unwanted events such as production below bubble point or condensate banking. So not only wells should produce better, but they should also flow for longer without intervention. (Note that this presentation can be tailored for specific local requirements such as "Perforating for Fracturing" or "Perforating Carbonates".
Andy Martin is a Technical Advisor of Perforating for Schlumberger having joined the company in 1979 as a field engineer. His career has taken him through operations, teaching cased hole services and technical writing. From 1996 to 2000 Andy worked at Rosharon, Texas Engineering Facility where perforating systems are developed, shaped charges manufactured and perforating research conducted for Schlumberger. Since then he has moved back to the UK and has been involved in all aspects of perforating and regularly presents and teaches on the topic.
He is a member of SPE, SPWLA and IExE and is a Schlumberger Advisor. Andy graduated from Oxford University obtaining an MA in Engineering Science.
Uncertainty assessment using reservoir simulation models for green- and brown-field situations has become a common practice. While capturing uncertainties in forecasts is required in all situations, developing multiple history-matched models is also an important goal for brownfield situations. Objective of this talk is to provide systematic and practical guidelines for uncertainty assessment work using reservoir simulation models.
This talk discusses steps involved in any uncertainty assessment including selection of uncertain parameters and their ranges, practical experimental design methods, appropriate response or tracking functions (or variables), and data analysis techniques. Roles of lessons learnt from a base-case history-match exercise for a brownfield situation as well as earth modeling/ petroleum engineering knowledge in setting up appropriate parameters and ranges are emphasized. Guidelines are provided to judge “quality of history match” based on prudent interpretation of response or tracking functions/variables. A Monte Carlo simulation-based methodology to develop multiple history-matched models for brownfield situations is presented in detail including practical tips on problem setup and analysis of results. Unique nature of uncertainties related to forecasting situations is discussed with an emphasis on a need to engage all operational and facilities personnel to develop adequate forecast problem description and economic success metrics.
Guidelines presented in this talk are illustrated using a case study example. Practical tips presented in this talk would be of use to all reservoir simulation engineers carrying out uncertainty assessments and always remember one thing - no matter how careful we are, we cannot assess the impact of unidentified uncertainty.
Anil Ambastha has 26 years of experience in various facets of oil and gas reservoir engineering, including applied reservoir simulation, pressure transient analysis, and thermal recovery, since his Ph.D. in petroleum engineering from Stanford University. He has worked in 6 countries and currently serves as "Reservoir Simulation Unit Lead" at Chevron Nigeria Limited. He also served as an Executive Editor of SPE Reservoir Evaluation and Engineering journal (Reservoir Engineering side) from 2008-2011. He is a winner of three SPE International Awards (Lester Uren Technical Excellence, Distinguished Member, and Distinguished Service), seven "Outstanding Technical Editor" Awards, and "A Peer Apart" Award.
First-Ever Comprehensive Environmental Characterization of Hydraulic Fracturing for Shale Oil and Gas Production
The well completion process of high volume hydraulic fracturing has become a touchstone for opposition to the development of oil and gas resources from shale source rocks. Although the development of shale gas and oil has brought substantial economic, geopolitical, and climate change benefits to the United States, hydraulic fracturing has displaced global climate change as the most controversial environmental policy issue. As other countries evaluate development of shale oil and gas, these same environmental concerns are available on the internet and media sources. Without data, the concerns become a substantial hindrance to acceptance of shale gas development.
This study presents the first-ever peer-reviewed study that quantifies the effects of two specific high-volume hydraulic fracturing jobs to 14 different environmental resource categories. The objective was to provide factual information supported by a high quality dataset to guide policy making. None of the measurements detected a change due to hydraulic fracturing, including microseismic effects, ground motion and induced seismicity, water quality, methane migration, community health, well integrity, fracture containment to the target zone, and others. The hydraulic fracturing occurred in the center of Los Angeles, California, at the largest urban oil field in the US. The level of community and regional concern, the breadth of the study, and many of the results are applicable to other shale oil and gas areas worldwide. The results provide the first dataset that addresses the range of concerns directly, and finds no adverse effects to any of the environmental resource categories.
Dr. Dan Tormey is an expert in energy and water. He works with the environmental aspects of all types of energy development, with an emphasis on oil and gas, including hydraulic fracturing and produced water management, pipelines, LNG terminals, refineries and retail facilities. He has conducted important assignments in onshore, offshore, nearshore, estuarine, riverine and glacial environments. Dan has worked throughout the US, Australia, Indonesia, Italy, Chile, Ecuador, Colombia, Venezuela, Brazil, Senegal, South Africa, Armenia and the Republic of Georgia. He has a Ph.D. in Geology and Geochemistry from MIT, and a B.S. in Civil Engineering and Geology from Stanford.
Unconventional Reservoirs require a new petrophysical paradigm and must go “beyond volumetrics.” Efficient unconventional resource appraisal should consider not only the static (storage) and dynamic (flow) properties within the context of the petroleum system and the current day pore geometry and fluid saturation distribution, but also the geomechanical stress regime and its implications for efficient completion design and reservoir performance prediction. Reservoirs with high potential for deliverability should be targeted for development; these zones will dominate well and field performance. The effective application of integrated subsurface and completion workflows leads to improved capital efficiency and well performance through increased well potential, increased ultimate recovery, and reduced costs.
David Spain is a Senior Advisor for Unconventional Gas Petrophysics in the BP Upstream Technology Group in Houston, Texas, where he leads the Geo-Engineered Completion Optimization Project. David has over 30 years experience in research and development, resource appraisal, field development, and integrated reservoir management across the globe. David obtained his graduate degree in Geology from Vanderbilt University in 1982; he attended the Amoco Petrophysics Training Program XXII and has published numerous papers on shale evaluation, tight gas reservoirs, and integrated petrophysical solutions.
The most important aspect in wellbore construction is creating and maintaining wellbore integrity and zonal isolation. The potential of fresh water contamination has captured the attention of the public and media. Cross flow between productive intervals or salt water zones can result in environmental and legal challenges as well as lost production. The number of wells developing annular pressure over time has become a concern and expense for operators. The design and placement of a competent cement seal in the annulus is critical when addressing these issues.
Laboratory testing of cement for use as a physical barrier in wellbore construction has been performed by our industry since the early 1900’s. This Presentation describes how the testing has progressed from Code 32, the first API code, to the present day ISO and API guidelines. The current testing methodology detailed in these guidelines is examined and compared to the actual forces cement is exposed to in the wellbore. Four tests are examined in detail; Thickening Time, Fluid Loss, Compressive Strength and Tensile Strength. The significance of tensile strength is presented.
Some of the traps that can be made by relying on standardized testing are exposed. New developments in cement testing to overcome these issues are presented. Recommendations are then made for testing beyond the standard ISO tests.
The audience should gain a better understanding of what they need cement to do and the laboratory tests required to make sure it does.
Don Purvis is currently a Senior Technical Consultant for Marathon Oil Company. He advises and provides strategies for the Drilling and Completion asset teams within Marathon. Prior to this role he was the US Vice President for Technical Services for Calfrac. In that role he was responsible for the engineering efforts related to Fracturing and Cementing in the US. Prior to Calfrac, Don was the Rocky Mountain Region Technical Manager for the Pressure Pumping division of Baker Hughes. He has 35 years of engineering experience in the oil industry. His previous positions include Engineering Training Manager, Mid-Continent Technical Manager, Research Scientist, and Technical Consultant. He has done extensive research in cement flow dynamics and testing methodology. He has authored 12 technical papers, and several technical journal articles. Don holds two process patents for completion strategies. Don and his wife reside north of Houston Texas and have two grown sons.
The petroleum industry has underperformed for decades because of project evaluation methods that do not fully account for uncertainty. Chronic biases, particularly overconfidence and optimism, persist because there has been little emphasis in the petroleum literature on the true cost of underestimating uncertainty and on how to quantify uncertainty reliably.
In this presentation I will present the results of recent work assessing the monetary impact of chronic overconfidence and optimism on portfolio performance. For moderate and typical amounts of overconfidence and optimism, expected disappointment (estimated NPV minus actual realized NPV) was 30-35% of estimated NPV for the industry portfolios and optimization cases analyzed. Significantly greater disappointments have actually been experienced in industry.
Decision making will be optimal in the long run only when probabilistic forecasts are well calibrated - P10s are true P10s, P90s are true P90s, and so forth. Changing corporate culture to consistently produce well-calibrated probabilistic forecasts will require education on the importance of lookbacks and calibration, as well as changes in business processes and incentive structures. Reliable assessment of uncertainty will add value to the bottom line, and has the potential to significantly improve company and industry financial performance.
Dr. Duane A. McVay is the Rob L. Adams ’40 Professor in the Department of Petroleum Engineering at Texas A&M University. He is a Distinguished Member of SPE. His primary research focus is on uncertainty quantification, particularly in the context of production forecasting and reserves estimation in oil and gas reservoirs. He joined Texas A&M in 1999, after spending 16 years with S.A. Holditch & Associates, a petroleum engineering consulting firm. He received B.S., M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Petroleum Engineering from Texas A&M University.
Increasing Production with Better Well Placement in Unconventional Shale Reservoirs - Challenges and Solutions
The idea that the stimulation process "will take care of the geology" in unconventional reservoirs is proving false.
Unconventional reservoirs are often regarded as resource plays with little demand for reservoir analysis beyond simple geosteering techniques during the development campaign. This leads to the common practice of stimulating wells with equally spaced stages and treating all the stages exactly the same, with no regard to the nature of the rock being treated. As a result, production can vary from each stage, with some stages either not contributing or doing poorly.
Clearly, the stimulation process alone cannot mitigate the impact of geology in unconventional reservoirs; however, mechanisms do exist for improving results in these reservoirs. Mapping the distribution of geomechanical properties for optimal stimulation is one example of unconventional thinking that can be applied. The practice of "steering to brittleness" or similar techniques can have a direct impact beyond simple well placement. Given a map of geomechanical properties along the wellbore, completion engineers can optimize the position of plugs or packers, and stimulation engineers can fine tune the design of the treatment applied to the rock. By re-establishing the link between production and geology, these methods can decrease the exploitation costs of unconventional reservoirs.
Jason Pitcher is an independent consultant. Based in Houston, TX, he works with clients in Exploration and Production, Oilfield Service companies, Oilfield Equipment Manufacturers and Private Equity groups as a technical advisor. He combines technical expertise with a solutions mindset enabling clients across the Upstream value chain to deliver on asset performance objectives.
Jason is an accomplished advisor to the E&P industry, with a personal focus on Unconventional resource exploitation and well placement. He has over 20 years of experience in the E&P space, having worked in multiple areas of subsurface and surface technology and operations.
Jason received his Bachelors of Science in Geology from the University of Derby and his Masters of Science in Mineral Exploration from Imperial College in London. He has co-authored over 30 papers and articles on topics including Unconventional Exploration and Development, LWD tools, Petrophysics and Geosteering. He is a two-time Distinguished Lecturer for the SPE, serving in 2012-2013 and 2015-2016.
On 20 April 2010, the Macondo blowout in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico killed 11 men, burned and sank the Deepwater Horizon drilling rig, and devastated the Gulf. Investigative authorities queried mechanical systems, operating decisions, corporate cultures, safety procedures, and testimony by survivors, academics, experts, and executives. Meanwhile, industry personnel need succinct, non-litigious, technical answers to fundamental questions about the cause of the blowout for application to future projects. Such answers define the specific mechanics, actions, and decisions on the rig that collectively opened a pathway into a cased-and-cemented deep-water wellbore and allowed hydrocarbons to flow unobserved from a high-pressure reservoir to eventually erupt over the derrick and continue even after the blowout preventers were closed.
To unravel the cause of the blowout, data during the well's final hours are assessed and defined using petroleum-engineering fundamentals, including wellbore mechanics, hydrodynamics, inflow performance, fluid properties, well-control principles, etc. The chain of events thus revealed includes forming an annulus-to-wellbore leak, exacerbating the leak, testing and declaring the well secure, causing the well to flow, and allowing the well to flow until too late, even for the blowout preventers. The technical assessment leads to conclusions that define those factors that contributed to the blowout, as well as to those that caused the blowout.
From the presentation, SPE members and a wider audience from across the industry and beyond will see by example the necessity and importance of applying petroleum-engineering and process-management fundamentals to day-to-day drilling work, in real time, both in the office and on the rig. From the Macondo assessment, a process-interruption protocol is defined, which can be applied to wells around the world, whether deep or shallow, onshore or offshore.
J. A. (John) Turley taught petroleum engineering at Marietta College before joining Marathon Oil Company, where he served as Gulf Coast drilling manager, U.K. operations manager, manager worldwide drilling, and vice president engineering and technology. He holds a professional degree in petroleum engineering from Colorado School of Mines, an MS in ocean engineering from University of Miami, and an executive management degree from Harvard University. Post-retirement, he independently researched the 2010 Macondo blowout and published "THE SIMPLE TRUTH"—a facts-based tome in which he examines the engineering causes of the Macondo blowout aboard the Deepwater Horizon. His first SPE paper (6022), "A Risk Analysis of Transition Zone Drilling," was published in 1976. In 2014, he published SPE-167970-MS, "An Engineering Look at the Cause of the 2010 Macondo Blowout." Turley, a member of SPE's Legion of Honor, has served SPE in academic and conference capacities, but most enjoyed chairing SPE's education and accreditation committee.
Economic development of low permeability, unconventional reservoirs has necessitated the development of leading edge horizontal drilling, completion, and stimulation techniques. As early as the 1980's, bold statements were made indicating that there were little advances in horizontal drilling technologies required, but that significant improvements in stimulation and completion technologies were necessary.
This presentation starts by asking the audience to consider two questions:
- Does completion technology lag behind drilling technology? and
- Can we drill longer wells than we can effectively complete/stimulate?
For the "resource plays" of today, it is recognized that the challenge for completion technologies to keep pace with drilling advances are different than in the past. Economic, supply chain, logistics and environmental challenges may present the largest hurdles. Today's challenges and limitations are discussed along with innovation solutions currently being applied.
The presentation wraps up by posing the future question: Are completion engineers prepared to effectively stimulate and complete the "3-mile lateral"? What will future field developments look like and what new completion technologies are required? Can we bridge the gap between drilling and completion in unconventional reservoirs?
Mary Van Domelen is an Engineering Advisor with Continental Resources. She holds a BS degree in Chemical Enginering and is a licensed engineer. She has 30 years of experience in research and practical application of well completions. Mary started her career with Halliburton and has worked in the USA, Europe and Africa. Prior to Continental, she worked for Maersk Oil and Chesapeake in horizontal drilling and completion operations. She has co-authored more than 30 papers and holds several patents. Mary plays an active role in the SPE by participating in organizing committees for conferences, applied technology workshops, and forums.
While many remote parts of the world and North America are awash with natural gas, Europe, South America and the vibrant economies of the East cannot get enough of the clean-burning, environmentally friendly fuel. The problem is transporting this compressible fluid long distances, across major bodies of water. For markets greater than 1,500 miles, liquefied natural gas (LNG) has proved to be the most economic option. By refrigerating natural gas (primarily methane) to -260ºF (-162ºC), thereby shrinking its volume by 600:1, LNG can be transported in large insulated cryogenic tankers at reasonable cost.
Natural gas liquefaction is a series of refrigeration systems similar to the air conditioning system in our homes, simply consisting of a compressor, condenser and evaporator to chill and condense the gas. The difference is in the scale and magnitude of the refrigeration. In contrast to the home system, a typical single-train LNG plant costs billions of dollars and consume 6-8% of the inlet gas as fuel. Since many of the impurities (water vapor, carbon dioxide, hydrogen sulfide, etc.) and heavier hydrocarbon compounds in natural gas would freeze at LNG temperatures, they must first be removed, and disposed or marketed as separate products.
This paper will provide an overview of LNG liquefaction facilities, from inlet gas receiving to LNG storage and loading. However, the focus is on the liquefaction process and equipment. Differences among the commercially available liquefaction processes (cascade, single mixed refrigerant, propane-pre-cooled mixed refrigerant, double mixed refrigerant, nitrogen, etc.) will be discussed. The aim is to provide SPE members with a clear understanding of the technologies, equipment and process choices required for a successful LNG project.
Michael Choi is a recent retiree. Prior to March 2015, he was a Process Engineering Fellow in ConocoPhillips’ Global Production Department located in Houston, Texas. His specialties are production facilities, sour gas treating and LNG. He was the lead process design engineer for CoP’s Qatargas3 LNG project. Prior to joining Conoco in 1985, Michael worked in various engineering capacities with El Paso Natural Gas, Aminoil and Getty Oil/Texaco. His work has led to a number of SPE publications and six US patents for separator design, emissions control system for glycol dehydrators and subsea processing and storage systems. Michael has been active in SPE as member of the PF&C Committee, program chairman and member of the ATCE and other international conferences and forums. He graduated from the University of Southern California in 1974 with a BS degree in chemical engineering.
Michael was an SPE Distinguished Lecturer during the 2012-13 lecture season.
Matrix stimulation treatments in carbonate reservoirs are generally considered low risk. Production increases from these treatments are routine and the advantages of these treatments are perceived to be high. However, many treatments realize only a small fraction of the true well potential. If a more holistic evaluation criterion is used, many treatments would not be considered successful. This lecture will start with a brief introduction to matrix stimulation in carbonates and describe typical design elements. This will be followed by design challenges, such as treatments in long heterogeneous intervals, in fractured reservoirs, and in mature reservoirs. The many variables influencing the treatment design and the challenge in optimizing the design with respect to these will be addressed. The influence of rock type, treatment fluid type, and operating conditions will be discussed. The available technologies for fluid placement will be presented in the context of formation complexity and the length of producing interval. The design workflow proposed will ensure that all variables are addressed systematically.
Dr. Murtaza Ziauddin is an Advisor for Matrix Stimulation and Production Chemistry with Schlumberger in Sugar Land, Texas. He has more than 18 years of production engineering experience. Murtaza Ziauddin has co-authored three SPE books. The lecture will draw on material from his most recent book, "Chemistry for Enhancing Production" as well as from his contributions to the upcoming update to the classical SPE Monograph on Acidizing. He has authored 27 technical papers and holds 14 patents. Murtaza has a BS degree from the University of Houston and a PhD degree from the University of Minnesota, both in chemical engineering.
For oil and gas companies, accelerating the process of assessing reserves is a strategic imperative. Often, core analysis appears to be a bottleneck for achieving this objective. Lab results must not only be accurate, but also quickly available. In some instances, the challenge can be met by simply rethinking the way in which certain well-established things are done. No sophisticated tools are required, just a change of perspective. An example is the compression of the amount of time that elapses between the acquisition of electric logs and the release of their final interpretation. Typically this time is of the order of several months because of the long equilibrium times required during core analysis. This can, however, be reduced to a few days working under non-equilibrium conditions. The instrumentation needed to do this is commonly available. Another example is the estimation of the amount of gas trapped by water influx, a critical parameter that may generate considerable uncertainty in the evaluation of recoverable reserves. By combining centrifuge and NMR measurements, it is possible to produce an exhaustive compilation of SCAL data for log interpretation and reservoir modeling in one day using just one core sample. Again, nothing but conventional instruments are required to do this type of analysis. Real applications are presented to show how these methods work. The "take home" message is that even long-established laboratory practices may have room for improvement and sometimes relatively small changes generate significant benefits.
Nicola Bona is technical leader of the Petroleum Engineering Laboratories at ENI e&p. Besides providing operative support for the characterization and development of oil and gas fields worldwide, he is actively involved in designing equipments and experimental protocols aimed at increasing the accuracy of petrophysical measurements and speeding up their execution. Among other things, Nicola pioneered the use of drill cuttings for reservoir characterization and the use of dielectric measurements to assess rock wettability, as well as new methods for evaluating the electrical response of rock. He developed also innovative techniques for the evaluation of fractured reservoirs, shaly rocks and tight sands which make use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Nicola has authored over 30 technical papers and holds two patents. He holds a degree in Plasma Physics from the University of Milan.
Making Better Appraisal & Development Decisions: Using Decision Risk Analysis & Value of Information
Behavioural science suggests that human nature favours decisions that satisfy (good enough is good?), not necessarily those that optimise. Often value is left on the table, particularly when risks & uncertainties are involved. More than fifty years ago an approach was born which helps to overcome this human limitation, namely Decision Risk Analysis (DRA), which helps us to optimise not just survive.
DRA is a structured process involving both facilitation and modelling that helps stakeholders optimise their decision making in the face of risks and uncertainties. Decisions come in all sorts of shapes and sizes and so does the best way to optimise the chosen value measures. This presentation introduced DRA and then focuses on one tool in the armoury known as Value of Information analysis (VOI). VOI is an acronym used by many, but maybe understood by few. The when, why and how of VOI will be explained, so hopefully, by the end of this talk the listeners will expand the ranks of the ‘few’.
If you are facing a number of decisions where outcomes are uncertain and there is an opportunity to acquire additional information which costs money and/or time, then you should consider undertaking a VOI analysis and this talk will be of interest to you.
Pete Naylor has a Physics BSc, a Chemical Engineering PhD and is a Chartered Scientist, a Chartered Engineer and a Fellow of the Institution of Chemical Engineers. He has 30 years of experience in oil & gas and for the past 15 years has led DRA studies to optimise significant investment decisions. He also leads Project Risk Management studies helping managers to achieve their objectives on time and budget. Pete has worked within integrated teams on major decisions including field appraisal and development strategies, refurbishment of facilities and asset integrity management. He has presented widely and has published more than 35 papers.
The unique challenges of hydrocarbon production from shale reservoirs have required operators to take a fresh approach to asset development. Decisions about well placement, geometry, completion, and production are interrelated and must be addressed as part of life cycle planning. Artificial lift systems must be configured for rapidly changing and dynamic production environments. Migration from one lift technology to another is often required for wells that typically experience steep production decline rates. This presentation discusses the unique challenges of unconventional production and presents current production trends supported by field examples. Recommendations for optimizing production from shale and tight reservoirs are presented.
Dr. Rajan Chokshi works as Optimizer for Accutant Solutions of Houston – A training and consulting services provider for production optimization.
In a career spanning over 30 years, Dr. Chokshi has worked on petroleum and software engineering projects globally in the areas of multi-phase flow, artificial lift design, and production optimization in oil and gas industries. He continues to consult and teach professional courses in these areas. His interests are developing and nurturing young talent globally, technology integration and commercialization.
Dr. Chokshi is a Society of Petroleum Engineers’ Distinguished Lecturer for the 2015-2016 year. He also serves on the SPE global committees for training and production awards. Dr. Chokshi holds a Bachelors and a Masters in Chemical Engineering from the Gujarat University and IIT-Kanpur, India; and a Ph.D. in Petroleum Engineering from the University of Tulsa, USA.
The task of identifying key production drivers in unconventional reservoirs remains challenging, even after decades of exploration and production in North America during which tens of thousands of horizontal unconventional wells have been drilled and completed. Tens to hundreds of variables, categorized as reservoir quality, well architecture, completion, stimulation, and production metrics, are involved and there are many different interrelationships among the variables to be considered. Further, formation evaluation is typically minimal and there are unknown variables in the system that can only be guessed at, ignored, or proxied.
The author’s team has combined Geographical Information Systems (GIS) analysis and multivariate analysis using boosted regression trees for improved data mining results as compared to univariate methods. The purpose of this lecture is to discuss key elements of data mining in unconventional reservoirs, in order to raise awareness of cutting-edge statistical tools and methods being brought to bear in the industry. The presentation will provide highlights of real world examples of data mining projects in three different shale plays.
If there were only one idea for audiences to take away from the lecture, it would be that exploiting unconventional reservoirs is a highly complex task with many moving parts and data mining is a needed tool to be applied to better understand the importance of specific well productivity drivers. Another way to say it is that the talk is intended to provide the audience with improved statistical methods for the "statistical" plays so that multi-million dollar decisions can be truly data-driven.
Randy LaFollette is the Director, Applied Reservoir Technology, for Baker Hughes Pressure Pumping. Mr. LaFollette holds a BSc degree in Geological Science from Lehigh University, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania. He has 37 years of experience in the industry. He is active in SPE, and AAPG, aiding with conference organization and presenting on various reservoir, completion / stimulation, and data-mining topics. Mr. LaFollette is a subject matter expert in Geoscience and Petroleum engineering for Baker Hughes and leads a team of experts responsible for structuring and implementing geospatial and data-mining studies of stimulation effectiveness linking reservoir quality, well architecture, well completion, and treatments performed to production results.
The spread of horizontal drilling and multiple-stage fracturing in unconventional reservoirs has revolutionized the oil and gas industry. Because of this revolution, engineers and geoscientists are using ground breaking technologies to optimize field development strategies. “Underground Laboratories” have become the new approach to solving complex problems like landing interval, well spacing, and completion design. These “laboratories” integrate technologies such as fiber optic distributed sensing, offset pressure monitoring, microseismic acquisition, and tracers in multiple neighboring wells.
This lecture will discuss completion design for fiber optic distributed acoustic sensing (DAS) and distributed temperature sensing (DTS) and how this data is incorporated with other advanced monitoring techniques. Real-life examples will be used to demonstrate how these new measurements are used to optimize completion design. Similarly, these integrated measurements are also important to build fracturing and reservoir models which inform landing interval and well spacing. The insight from these Underground Laboratories becomes the foundation for optimizing production, capital allocation, and ultimate recoveries from unconventional reservoirs.
The takeaway from this lecture will be a new understanding of using advanced fracture monitoring to make better decisions for unconventional field development.
Trey Lowe is the Completions Technology Manager at Devon Energy, where he leads a team focused on optimizing completions across the United States. Trey has spent more than 15 years working on completion and production operations in various countries around the globe. After designing and executing complex offshore completions, he began applying this experience to the US unconventional plays. Trey serves on the SPE ATCE Well Completions Program Committee and has authored multiple technical papers on completion and production operations. Prior to joining Devon, he held various field, management, and technical positions with Schlumberger Oilfield Services. During his time at Schlumberger, he was awarded the “Performed by Schlumberger, Chairman’s Award” for advancement of multiphase measurement. Trey has a Bachelor of Science in Chemical Engineering from Oklahoma State University.
Industry has recognized that dynamic reservoir characterization, from wellbore pressure and production behaviors, is a key driver for maximizing the production and recovery of a reservoir. Accurate simulation requires appropriate modeling of the existing heterogeneities in the field. Most of the main fields around the world produce from naturally fractured vuggy reservoirs, where matrix, fracture network, and high vuggy porosity are usually present. Vugs effect on permeability is related to their connectivity and the determination of permeability and porosity in vuggy zones from core measurements are likely to be pessimistic. Also, some fractured reservoirs exhibit a fractal behavior, which describes fractures with different scales, poor fracture connectivity and disorderly spatial distribution. Both fractured vuggy and fractal behavior reservoirs cannot be explained by the conventional dual-porosity model. This lecture addresses different characterization approaches that take into consideration the above descriptions, that include as special case the classic dual-porosity model, and reviews field applications in which these approaches were used in reservoir characterization by using pressure transient and rate data. It also outlines the challenges encountered during characterization of fractured reservoirs and presents a current and future vision for an appropriate dynamic characterization of these reservoirs.
Rodolfo Camacho works as a senior engineer for Pemex E&P. He has more than 30 years of experience in academia and E&P fields. He has developed several well test analysis techniques, and analysis and interpretation methods of production data. He has authored or co-authored more than 100 technical papers on petroleum engineering. He has won several awards including the 2008 Lester Uren Award. He holds a BS degree in geophysical engineering from the University of Mexico and MS and PhD degrees in petroleum engineering from the University of Tulsa.
Optimism in Reservoir Production Forecasting - Impact of Geology, Heterogeneity, Geostatistics, Reservoir Modeling, and Uncertainty
The oil and gas industry uses static and dynamic reservoir models to assess volumetrics and to help evaluate development options via production forecasts. The models are routinely generated using sophisticated software. Elegant geological models are generated without a full understanding the limitations imposed by the data or the underlying stochastic algorithms. Key issues facing reservoir modelers that have been evaluated include use of reasonable semivariogram model parameters (a measure of heterogeneity), model grid size, and model complexity. However, reservoir forecasts tend to be optimistic – a statement not provable with data in the public domain. Yet, conversations at technical meetings, the lack of industry publications highlighting actual forecast accuracy, the development of more detailed reservoir models (presumably to yield better forecasts), all suggest that the industry could improve its reservoir performance forecast accuracy. For example, dynamic models that use larger grid cells yield optimistic forecasts for some recovery processes as compared to forecasts obtained from models built with smaller grid sizes. Also, the use of stochastic earth models and well placement optimization workflows will likely yield optimistic forecasts. Overall, the impact of cell size, model parameters, inadequate use of analog data, and poorly constrained well location optimization may increase forecast optimism by 5-10 recovery factor units or more. Knowing what workflow aspects may contribute to forecast optimism should enable the industry to generate more reliable forecasts and make better use of capital.
Dr. William Meddaugh joined the Midwestern State University in 2013 as the RL Bolin Distinguished Professor of Petroleum Geology. He has 32 years of experience with Chevron including technical project management experience on projects in the United States, Canada, Venezuela, Middle East, West Africa, and Australia. He is a member of the SPE, AAPG, and EAGE and is an Associate Editor for the SPE Reservoir Evaluation and Evaluation Journal. He received a PhD in geology from Harvard in 1983. He has authored or co-authored over 30 peer reviewed and SPE technical papers on forecast optimism, reservoir characterization, and modeling.
Subsurface uncertainty is one of the main challenges in using reservoir models to predict field performance for development and depletion planning purposes. The importance of reliable characterization of subsurface uncertainty and its impact on reservoir performance predictions is increasingly recognized as essential to robust decision making in the upstream industry, which is especially true for large projects in complex geologic settings. However, despite recent advances in reservoir modeling and simulation, reliable quantification of the impact of subsurface uncertainty remains difficult in practice. Many factors lead to this state of affair; technically, a fundamental difficulty is that reservoir heterogeneity at multiple scales may have strong effect on fluid flows. This lecture presents an analysis of the challenge and possible resolutions. Indeed, relying on computing power alone may not address the challenge. Instead, we must look at reservoir modeling and performance prediction holistically, from modeling objectives to appropriate techniques of incorporating reservoir heterogeneity into the models. We present a goal-driven and data-driven approach for reservoir modeling with the theoretical reasoning and numerical evidence behind them, including real field examples. We show that the proposed approach is driven by the practical limitations inherent in numerical approximations of Darcy flow equations as well as how fluid flow responds to reservoir heterogeneity. The one idea that participants of this lecture should take away is that appropriate parameterization of multi-scale reservoir heterogeneity that is tailored to the business questions at hand and available data is essential for addressing the challenge of subsurface uncertainty.
Xiao-Hui Wu joined ExxonMobil Upstream Research Company in 1997. His research experience covers geologic modeling, unstructured gridding, upscaling, reduced order modeling, and uncertainty quantification. He is a Senior Earth Modeling Advisor in the Computational Science Function. Xiao-Hui received his Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Tennessee and worked as a postdoc in Applied Mathematics at Caltech before joining Exxon Mobil. He is a member of SPE and SIAM, a technical editor/reviewer for the SPE Journal, Journal of Computational Physics, and Multiscale Modeling and Simulation. He served on program committees of several conferences, including the Reservoir Simulation Symposium.
Extracting hydrocarbons from subterranean formations is a prolonged operation stretching over several decades. During this period, a bewildering variety of chemical additives are used to address various needs of the oilwell operations. A 2010 estimate puts the projected global annual OFC sales at about $30 billion by the year 2015.
The OFC chemicals must be approved for use and registered by appropriate regulatory agencies of individual countries. Unfortunately, there is no global uniformity in the laws applicable to chemical use in individual countries. Frequently, even within the same country, different agencies of a government can have different requirements that a chemical must meet before they can be approved. This puts a tremendous pressure on OFC suppliers to dedicate resources and efforts to develop chemicals to meet diverse regulations even when they are meant for the same application. It is not uncommon that development of new products and technologies is often not undertaken because of lack of business justification.
It is a fact that all parties involved in hydrocarbon production wish to develop and use only chemicals which are based on sound HSE principles and practices, but differ only in what the HSE data and protocols ought to be for approvals. This talk hopes to bring awareness to the current status of OFC use from HSE perspectives and stimulate a healthy discussion; and puts forth a proposal for consideration aiming for unified global approval requirements for OFC use by all nations based on cradle-to-grave holistic approach that is based on not only HSE compliance, but also on HSE-based best practices from syntheses all the way through production, storage and transportation phases. The talk solicits and urges concept buy-in and united campaign from global organizations connected to hydrocarbon production to globally harmonize testing protocols and approval processes for OFC chemicals.
Primary Technical Discipline: HSSESR
B. R. Reddy has been with Halliburton for 17 years, and is currently Chief Scientific Advisor - Chemist.During this period, he has worked in the areas of Cementing, Conformance, drilling fluids, and long range research covering all areas of Halliburton chemical research. The job responsibilities included new product and processes developments. Some of the new technologies that he has contributed to were recognized with granting of 177 US patents. He has coauthored more than 35 SPE papers.
One of the greatest revolutions in the history of the oil and gas industry has taken place over the past decade. This revolution is the rise of the shale reservoirs. First drilled in the 1820s these reservoirs did not attract serious attention due to their economics until the late 1990s when the Barnett Shale emerged as an industry “game changer”. Numerous other shales rapidly attracted the attention of the industry until today dozens of shales are currently being drilled throughout North America. This revolution is rapidly spreading to many locations throughout the world. Initially these shales were developed using statistical drilling methods in which a large number of horizontal boreholes are drilled throughout the play. Until recently gas prices supported the economics of this approach. But due to their success, an abundance of gas has caused a decrease in gas price and a new economic paradigm has emerged, shale sweet spot drilling. Production from numerous shale plays indicates the existence of these sweet spots. These result from certain geologic conditions, such as increased matrix porosity or TOC, increased micro-fractures and areas with increased brittleness. These reservoir characteristics affect the physical rock properties which, in turn, affect a passing seismic signal. Recent advances in seismic interpretation have demonstrated that these shale reservoir sweet spots can be detected prior to drilling. The ability to locate these sweet spots before drilling significantly impacts the economics associated with these plays. During this presentation a number of these seismic interpretation methodologies will be discussed.
Primary Technical Discipline: RDD
Brian E. Toelle is Adjunct Assistant Professor at West Virginia University and an Advisor in Exploration and Geophysics for Schlumberger. He holds BSc, MS, and PhD degrees in geology and has worked in the oil and gas industry for over 33 years. He has authored/co-author 47 professional papers, posters and presentations, received Saudi Aramco’s Exploration Professional of the Year Award and the "Performed by Schlumberger Award". His expertise includes Exploration Play and Prospect Generation, Shale Reservoir Geology and Geophysics, Field Development Planning, Underground Gas Storage Field Development, Enhanced Oil Recovery Projects, CO2 Sequestration Projects and Seismic-based Fracture Detection methods.
The key message is that the offshore use of CO2 for EOR is in its infancy but with the adoption of CCS to decarbonize fossil-fuelled power generation there is a time critical opportunity to add value to the CCS chain by adopting and maturing offshore CO2 EOR.
The UK has a legally binding target to reduce CO2 emissions by at least 80% by 2050 (compared to 1990). To achieve this, a significant proportion of the UK’s fossil-fuelled power generation is likely to be replaced by new coal and gas-fired power stations equipped with carbon capture. Screening studies have shown that there is technical potential to achieve an incremental recovery in the billions of barrels from CO2 injection in the UK’s offshore oil reservoirs and significant potential in adjacent national blocks. However, there is no experience of injecting anthropogenic CO2 into offshore oil fields so despite the maturity of land-based CO2 EOR, this is a significant new challenge.
As there is a global imperative to reduce CO2 emissions, this opportunity is potentially also available to other countries with fossil-fuelled power generation and an offshore oil industry. The talk will include policy background, plans by utility companies, sources and sinks for CO2, the EOR opportunity, infrastructure requirements, logistics and engineering challenges.
Primary Technical Discipline: MI
David S Hughes is a reservoir engineer with 34 years’ experience. He currently works for Senergy in the UK.
Throughout his career he has specialized in the scientific, technical and engineering aspects of enhanced oil recovery processes including hydrocarbon and CO2 gas injection, chemical and biological processes, and in situ combustion.
David has undertaken design assessments of CO2 EOR projects in offshore and onshore reservoirs and was first involved in such assessments in the 1980s. He is currently undertaking engineering studies related to offshore CO2 storage, EOR & EGR and low salinity water flooding.
David holds a BS Honors degree in Physics from the University of Surrey, UK and was previously a SPE DL in 2008-2009.
There is a need to take a closer look at one aspect of sand control commonly recognized, but seldom addressed; formation fines. How many times are good sand control methods placed in wells only to have the wells make “sand” which really turns out to be “fines”. Several major operating companies are now starting to notice many wells are showing increasing skins over time. Many factors can contribute to Increasing skin over time; however, one of the most often cited causes is formation fines migrating into and becoming trapped in the near wellbore reservoir matrix and/or gravel pack or frac pack. If fines are a major factor, what are the sources of the fines? What factors contribute to the generation of the fines? What kind and how much fines are generated? What controls the production of the fines? What is the impact of any fines on production and downhole equipment? What is the relative importance of these factors? If fines can/do move, it is possible to address potential problems by changing the sand control method, production/injection strategy; i.e., Flux Management, or wellbore architecture to minimize the impact of fines production. Chemical treatment of the near wellbore area is also possible. The presentation discusses a methodical approach to evaluating the potential for fines production, ways to address the issues, and to appraise the overall impact on the life cycle of the well. Case histories are presented to illustrate the impact of fines on production and how it is possible to address problems related to the movement of formation fines.
Primary Technical Discipline: DC
David Underdown is a Research Consultant with Chevron Energy Technology Company in Houston. He holds a PHD in physical chemistry, and has worked in the area sand control and formation damage for over 40 years for Getty Oil Company, Baker Sand Control, ARCO and now Chevron. He is past Chairman of the API Task Force on perforating, Chairman of one of SPE’s Award committees, Chairman of a SPE paper review committee, editor of the SPE Monographs on sand control and completion fluids. He has multiple papers and patents.
As oil demand increases and technology advances deeper carbonate reservoirs are being developed, some off-shore in high water depths such as in Brazil’s Presalt. These reservoirs contain mainly Dolomite/Limestone having porosity variations from microcrystalline to caverns, also natural hairline fractures are encountered due to tectonics becoming double porosity heterogeneous reservoirs.
Depending on reservoir’s tightness and radial damage extent from the construction phase, these reservoirs may require stimulation to initiate production or to be commercial. Carbonate rocks are 100% soluble in HCl that is the standard acid used to stimulate these wells with postive but seldom optimum results. Limited acid penetration and possible formation collapses at the near wellbore caused by rapid acid reaction can impair the full stimulation benefit. The reaction is “mass transfer controlled” affecting radial treatment displacement as wormholes are spontaneously created, that commingled with high acid diffusivity reduce our ability to control acid leak off. Lower permeability and higher temperatures encountered in deeper reservoirs increase the reaction rate; on the other hand the acid dissolving power are limited volumetrically for typical concentrations and higher volumes are required. An optimum stimulation can be obtained by balancing Penetration and Conductivity, so technology has evolved in their search. More efficient, resistant and friendly products and systems have been developed, that are now being used in Horizontal Wells stretching their application. Acid tunneling lateral branches have improved penetration and ‘viscoelastic surfactants’ have improved acid distribution, both noticeable in improved treatment results that are illustrated as case histories in this presentation
Primary Technical Discipline: PO
Gino Di Lullo is a registered engineer and holds a BSEE from UCP-Brazil.
After training with DS in Bolivia, he alternated Field, Technical, Marketing and Managerial positions in Middle East, South America, Asia and Africa for Schlumberger, BJ Services, Baker and Superior Energy where he retired in 2013, becoming an Energy Consultant.
Being a multidiscipline engineer has interacted in most related areas of our business aiming to construct wells more productively and cost effectively, as such during his carreer he invented cementing, acidising and fracturing additives, developed design software, authored several patents (including Sandstone Acid and Acid Tunneling) and published over 50 technical papers.
Participated in 3 SPE Formation Damage-Stimulation Forums in Bali and was the Keynote Speaker for the SPE-ATW in Kota Kinabalu. In 2006 organized the first and only Regional SPE- Distinguished Lecture Forum in Rio.
Logging measurements in cased wellbores are almost always more difficult to make and tend to be more sensitive to the logging environment than the equivalent measurements in open hole. While not all openhole measurements are possible in cased wellbores it is possible to make many of our more basic measurements in either open or cased wellbores.
There are numerous reasons for making traditional openhole measurements after casing has been set. Some of these reasons include difficult logging conditions, highly deviated wells where deployment is a problem, or simply avoiding expensive rig time. The increasing numbers of horizontal wells, especially in unconventional reservoirs, has led to a trend where the majority of new horizontal wells are not logged. Logging While Drilling or deployment of wireline tools in long horizontal openhole sections are often not an option due to cost or risk factors associated with deployment. Logging after the well has been cased can offer a greatly reduced risk as well as reduced cost.
The introduction of pulsed neutron capture measurements nearly 50 years ago provided some of the first opportunities to do formation evaluation in cased wellbores [Raymer and Morris, SPWLA Paper G 1964]. Over the years, new cased hole measurements have been introduced to make measurements previously only observed in openhole.
It is not my intention to suggest that logging in cased wellbores provides better data than what can be achieved in openhole. However in many cases it is possible to acquire the necessary data in cased holes to allow for a better completion design. Nowhere is this more useful than in the complex wellbores of today where we often have no formation evaluation data on which to base our completion.
Primary Technical Discipline: RDD
James Hemingway started with Schlumberger in 1980 and has held various petrophysics and engineering positions with Schlumberger since 1982. He has been heavily involved in reservoir monitoring of Enhanced Oil Recovery operations using techniques designed for use in cased wellbores. James holds degrees in chemistry and chemical engineering.
In 1997 he joined the Formation Evaluation department at the Schlumberger Sugar Land Product Center working on the RSTPro* (carbon-oxygen) tool and "Three-Phase Holdup" interpretation techniques. He moved to Paris in 2001 as a new technology advisor and has been based in Houston since 2010 as a Petrophysics Advisor focusing on unconventional resources.
James was a Distinguished Lecturer for the Society of Petrophysicists and Well Log Analysts in 2000-2001 and 2011-2012 on cased hole logging technologies.
Acoustic data are routinely acquired around the world for a variety of uses, but most often for classic applications such as seismic correlation, pore pressure prediction, porosity, and hydrocarbon identification. However, hidden in the very same waveform data acquired for these purposes is a wealth of additional information. A second look at the data can often yield hidden treasures, such as fracture characterisation, permeability, wellbore stability, hole size, cement evaluation, production optimisation, brittleness maps, and much more.
In this presentation, we discuss some of the many gems that can be mined from acoustic waveform data. Included is a brief review of the "flavours" of acoustic tools appropriate for each application as well as tips for optimising data
Primary Technical Discipline: RDD
Jennifer Market is currently the Global Acoustics Advisor for Weatherford. Her role involves acoustic data processing and interpretation, along with development of software and new application. She also provides industry training seminars to widen the understanding of acoustic data acquisition and applications. She has 15+years’ experience in borehole acoustics, working in a service company to develop acoustics tools and applications. She frequently publishes articles for both SPWLA and SPE and was an SPWLA lecturer in 2008-2009 and 2011-2012.
We all agree it is necessary to have an adequate safety culture to minimize the possibility of major accidents. This presentation explains what is meant by a “safety culture”, and provides guidance as to what is required to develop an adequate culture of safety and assure it actually exists in practice. A change in safety requires a change in attitudes and actions on the part of both management and worker. Both the Operator and the regulator have a role to play in making this happen.
Primary Technical Discipline: HSSESR
Ken Arnold has almost fifty years of industry experience with 16 years at Shell Oil Company. He founded Paragon Engineering Services in 1980 which was voted one of the best places in Houston to work by the Houston Business Journal. In 2005 Paragon was purchased by AMEC. In September 2007, Ken retired from AMEC and formed K Arnold Consulting, Inc. (KACI). In 2010 he joined WorleyParsons as a part-time Senior Technical Advisor while maintaining KACI for independent consulting work.
Ken is co-author of two textbooks and author of over 50 technical articles on safety management, project management and facilities design. He has twice been chosen as an SPE distinguished lecturer. He has twice served on the Board of SPE, is currently Treasurer-Elect of The Academy of Medicine, Engineering and Science of Texas and a former member of the Marine Board of the National Research Council. He was Chair of the National Research Council Committee which prepared a report for the Department of the Interior on "Evaluating the Effectiveness of Safety and Environmental Management Systems for Offshore Operations".
Ken has taught facilities engineering at the University of Houston as well as for several oil companies. He is a registered professional engineer and serves on the advisory board of the engineering schools of Tulane University and Cornell University and the Petroleum Engineering Advisory Board of University of Houston.
Mr. Arnold was an SPE Distinguished Lecturer in 1994-95 & 2002-03.
Information about fluid properties is a required input for every stage in the oil and gas industry from the reservoir to the refinery. It is therefore of utmost importance for reservoir, facility and corrosion engineers to understand the volumetric behaviour and the transport properties of the produced fluid. These fluid properties can be obtained from PVT reports generated either in-house or in external labs. In both cases, engineers should be able to perform a consistency check on the data before including it in their respective tasks.
This presentation provides an overview of tools for verifying the consistency of PVT data. Among them are mass balance, cross plots and the Y-function for the constant composition experiment (CCE) and for the differential liberation experiment (DLE) for oils. As well, basic quantities, like thermal expansion or oil compressibility always have to lie within a certain order of magnitude. The formation volume factor Bo, the compressibility and the viscosity of oil depend more on the amount and only to a lesser degree on the composition of solution gas. Based on the idea of ideal solutions one can find estimates for Bo,Co,µo. Correlations for oils applicable to different oil provinces complete the checks for oil. For gas-condensates the CCE gives valuable insights into the quality of the experiment. The constant volume depletion (CVD) for gas-condensates is more difficult to check, but calculating the K-values can serve as a quality control. In both cases, black oil and compositional, it is customary to model the experiments with equations of state (EOS).
Primary Technical Discipline: RDD
Klaus Potsch is a retired Senior Expert from OMV and also serves as a consultant for Fluid Studies. He holds a BS and MS in Physics, and a PhD in Mechanical Engineering from the Technical University of Vienna, where he also worked as an Assistant Professor. For the last 4 years he has been a guest lecturer for "Reservoir Fluids and their Modeling" at the Mining University of Leoben, Austria. In his professional career he headed the team of Mathematics, Reservoir Engineering and finally High Pressure Technology in the Laboratory of Exploration and Production of OMV. Within SPE he has held several positions in the Vienna Basin Section board and from 2003-2008 served on the International Board of SPE as the Regional Director for South, Central and Eastern Europe. Klaus was also on the SPE Distinguished Lecturer Committee from 2003-06.
The Science and Engineering of Internal Corrosion Control in the Upstream Petroleum Industry … mainly about managing water …
Unsuccessful control of internal corrosion has historically caused catastrophic incidents in the the upstream petroleum industry. Corrosion control requires a synergy between a sound basis of design and an appropriate operability philosophy. Equipment used in upstream operations may include but not limited to casing, production tubings, risers, flowlines, pipelines and facilities. Corrosion control related decisions made at design level and guidelines set for operations will always be driven by water management. Ranging from lowering water content in oil export lines to tightening water specification in pipelined gas, guidelines to control corrosion are strongly based on water quality and movement within the equipment and the process. While corrosion prediction and mitigation involve thorough understanding and application of scientific concepts of water chemistry, flow dynamics, and transport phenomena; corrosion monitoring/inspection requires sound engineering practices in order to track water, monitor changes and meet internal and external requirements. The success of corrosion control programs is also strongly affected by the level of collaboration and integration within the asset integrity and operation teams.
Primary Technical Discipline: PFC
Mohsen Achour is currently leading the corrosion, inspection and materials group within Global Production Excellence Division of ConocoPhillips USA. He holds a PhD in Chemical Engineering and Materials from Oklahoma State University and Adjunct Professor honorary title from Ohio University Institute of Corrosion and Multiphase Technology Center. He had held an Associate Professor of Chemical Engineering position at the University of Carthage in Tunisia for 11 years before joining ConocoPhillips in 2006. He has published more than 60 technical papers and patents in the areas of transport phenomena and corrosion and supervised more than 20 Master and PhD students. He is a member of SPE and NACE International and has been extensively active chairing multiple technical committees, sessions and symposiums in regional and international events for both organizations. He is recipient of multiple internal ConocoPhillips technology innovation, collaboration, and technical achievement awards over the past few years.
Managed Pressure Drilling (MPD) has been offered over a decade now. The common thinking is that MPD has the potential to be a widely used enabling technology in the future, but has been met with relatively limited acceptance by oil companies. One of the key factors to adopting technology is better communication of its benefits using more detailed case studies. The other major factor is that MPD is a complex, multidisciplinary activity that requires specific skills and resources to ensure project engineering/management and strict HSE management. Confusion about MPD’s application may also have contributed to its slow acceptance rate. To overcome these challenges requires a paradigm shift in thinking.
Saudi Aramco’s drilling program could benefit from MPD. A 2012 NPT analysis revealed that MPD can reduce lost time by 23.5%. Saudi Aramco has recognized MPD as one of the key initiatives that will enable it to optimize its drilling operations. The targeted areas in Saudi Aramco are tight gas formations, extended reach wells, high pressure and loss circulation prone workover wells as well as some exploratory wells. This presentation will highlight some of the case studies, as well as lessons learned on the MPD implementations. Sharing the true MPD benefit will enhance the adoption of this enabling technology in a wider scale including frontier applications, such as HPHT, deepwater, Methane hydrates and unconventionals.
Primary Technical Discipline: DC
Muhammad Muqeem is a Drilling Engineering Specialist with over 20 years of international expertise in the area of underbalanced/managed pressure drilling, wellbore hydraulics, and multiphase fluid flow in porous media. He has extensive experience in horizontal, multilateral wells including coil-tubing and sour drilling. Muhammad has authored and co-authored several SPE papers on multiphase flow, casing drilling, stuck pipe and underbalance drilling. Contributing author of Gulf Publishing Company's "Underbalanced Drilling: Limits and Extremes" book. He received a Ph.D. in petroleum engineering from the University of Alberta. He was the project lead and instrumental in the first ever implementation of UBD in Saudi Arabia. Muhammad is currently employed by Saudi Aramco in the Drilling Technical Department and is a member of SPE and APEGA.
Wellbore Position, Quality Control, Gross Errors and Error Models
Good wellbore positioning; including techniques for avoiding collisions or finding and intersecting other wells is critical to control catastrophic blow out accidents, rescue stranded miners, drill close proximity wells with minimal environmental impact, or drill wells with complicated trajectories that access new reservoirs.
The trajectory of an oil well is at best an estimation of where the well is, based on available measurements. Uncertainties on the position of the wellbore increases as points on the wellbore trajectory are further away from the wellhead. An error model represents the survey tool behavior, modeling errors and uncertainties of the tools and accounting for measurement procedure. The result is a statistical representation of the uncertainty, with a 3D ellipsoid centered at each survey point of the wellbore trajectory.
Quality control of the data to assure the correct measurements, readings taken within the range of tool calibration, magnetic measurements free of magnetic interference, etc. is crucial to avoid gross errors. Internal quality control in a survey is not by itself sufficient to assure a survey free of gross errors. Performing two independent surveys is the best way to detect gross errors and to confirm that a survey can be represented by its error model. The use of data without the adequate QC is risky and does not provide assurance of the position of the well or its uncertainty. Several examples will be used to illustrate the benefits of directional data quality control.
Primary Technical Discipline: DC, RDD
Nestor Eduardo Ruiz received his Electronic Engineer degree at the University of Buenos Aires Argentina. He started his career in 1983 as a field services engineer and then moved into development and producing directional software, for planning and controlling wellbore trajectories, of directional wells. He was in charge of the directional drilling magnetic survey tools and software. He planned the trajectories of the first horizontal wells drilled in Argentina which also included blow out well experience. As LAS manager for Gyrodata, In 2010 he was involved in the planning and supervision of the gyro directional drilling surveys, in the C miner rescue plans in Chile.
Nestor also was SPE chairperson of the Patagonia section and gave presentations of directional surveys in universities of Argentina, Brazil and Peru in the last years. He also participate in several ISCWSA meetings. In addition to English, he speaks Spanish and Portuguese.
Nearly 40% of today’s oil production comes from mature fields and this proportion is increasing. A significant portion of operating costs in brown fields is related to lifting costs and maintenance of artificial lift equipment. Often additional costs for workovers arise due to sub-optimal corrosion control or when sand production becomes an issue (unconsolidated reservoirs) or as the result of a long water flood history. Any combination of these problems can lead to premature abandonment of the field despite the fact that significant oil and gas reserves remain in the reservoir.
In order to combat this loss of reserves and valuable energy resource a number of measures have to be taken. There are two keys to success: 1. the analysis of available technologies along the production chain, the identification of advanced materials and the development of stringent processes all directed to extend the lifetime of the equipment. 2. A dedicated team from all disciplines working with the asset to create tailor-made solutions for the particular applications in the field.
The presentation will provide a field case showing this process and will give a detailed insight of the basket of technical solutions and the commercial impact.
Primary Technical Discipline: PO
Siegfried Müssig is currently working as Technology and Quality Manager at RAG. He holds a Diploma and a PhD in Physics of the University Karlsruhe, Germany. Between 1982 and 2002 held several technical and management positions at the German affiliate of Shell, BEB Erdöl and Erdgas GmbH. Between 2002 and 2006 he worked for Shell International in Rijswijk, The Netherlands, where he was a founding member of the Smart Fields Initiative and worked as Regional Coordinator for the Middle East and Africa. Between 2006 and 2008 he was Development Manager "Under Ground Gas Storages (UGS)" at RAG focusing on the storage project "7Fields" where seven independent gas fields were integrated into one UGS. Between 2008 and 2011 he was Manager Well Technology for Maersk Oil, Copenhagen, Denmark. Throughout his entire career he was dedicated to innovative technologies when conventional solutions failed. In this capacity he was appointed as board member of the Ceradyne Inc. Group and PLECon Engineering GmbH.
S. Müssig has published 35 technical papers and 6 patents, is a guest lecturer at the University of Leoben, Austria and an active SPE member, he served e.g. as Chairman of the German SPE section in 1994/5)
A 250 year history of scientific development preceded the first synthetic diamond. Finally, in the 1950’s, when understanding and equipment aligned, the breakthrough came, man finally made diamond. A period of increasing understanding of the manufacturing process followed, leading to a new product every year for machining of non-ferrous materials. Two decades further on, in 1973, the polycrystalline diamond compact was invented but it took another seven years of development before it established itself as the new drilling product for oil and gas wells. Early this century, following a further twenty years of innovation, peaking with the invention of a thermally stable PDC, the PDC bit market finally exceeded that of the roller cone bit, the leading drilling product for nearly a century. A decade has passed since the last great innovation but exponents of the synthetic diamond art have demonstrated, throughout its history, a thirst to drive the technology forward. How will they combine the latest knowledge and newest equipment for improved drilling products?
Primary Technical Discipline: DC
Terry Matthias holds a BSc in Mechanical Engineering, is a Chartered Engineer and a Fellow of the Institute of Mechanical Engineering in the United Kingdom. He joined Drilling & Service, a drill bit company, in 1980 at the very beginning of the successful commercialisation of polycrystalline diamond compacts bits. For the last 33 years he has worked on and managed PDC bit and cutter design/development. He established a PDC manufacturing facility in the UK and led the team that invented an industry changing, and award winning, thermally stable PDC. He is named inventor on 23 US patents.
Shale resource development technology is being improved and optimized for the past 5 to 7 years as the industry saw a sharp rise in activity throughout North America and other emerging countries. Despite such improvements and optimization, the performance of these wells illustrates that not all wells are producing commercially and, for that matter, in wells that are producing commercially, not all hydraulic fracture stages are contributing. In this lecture, well-defined criterion will be identified and used to isolate the sweet spot location within a field for optimal well placement. The lecture will also cover vital formation/zone characteristics that can identify the placement for hydraulic fracture stages and thus move away from the arbitrary geometric placement. Examples from three basins illustrate the practical application of the methodology
Primary Technical Discipline: RDD
Usman Ahmed is vice president of unconventional resources global market segment and chief reservoir engineer at Baker Hughes. Ahmed has more than 30 years of practical petroleum engineering experience and holds a BS and MS in petroleum engineering from Texas A&M University. He has more than 70 publications, textbooks, and patents.
With the decrease in the possibility of discovering new giant oil fields, mature fields become critically important for meeting future oil demands. Special attention is required for identifying the proper diagnostic techniques to determine the reason for and the location of the unrecovered oil and prudential reservoir management techniques for economically viable redevelopment applications. In this lecture, after discussing the methods to estimate the amount and location of the residual oil, attention will be given to the most widely applied enhanced oil recovery methods to develop mature fields—primarily chemical and immiscible/miscible gas injection. After reviewing mid- and late-stage development options using these methods, proper reservoir management strategies for different size companies will be discussed.
Primary Technical Discipline: RDD
Tayfun Babadagli is a professor of petroleum engineering at the University of Alberta where he is a senior chair holder of Unconventional Oil Recovery in the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada. He earned BS and MS degrees from Istanbul Technical University and MS and PhD degrees from the University of Southern California. Babadagli is the executive editor of SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering.
Characterizing Shale Plays—The Importance of Recognizing What You Don’t Know
Understanding the uncertainty in individual well performance is particularly critical during the exploration drilling program where there are relatively few wells on which to base decisions. Key questions during the early phases include "How many wells do I need to drill before I have confidence in the results?" and "Does the well performance I’ve seen to date provide the encouragement needed to keep drilling?" Understanding the uncertainty in well performance, and planning for it will lead to more efficient exploration activity and better informed decision-making.
Primary Technical Discipline: RDD
Brad Berg is the reservoir engineering manager for US onshore exploration at Anadarko Petroleum. He has been instrumental in developing the methodologies and tools that his company uses to evaluate unconventional resource plays.
Perforating for Inflow Performance in Natural Completions
Delivering well performance in tighter and more marginal reservoirs requires a greater degree of focus on the interface between the wellbore and the reservoir. Conventional perforated wells still represent a majority of completions, and optimizing the perforation by applying both relevant perforating technology and modeling can provide significant gains in both net present value, ultimate recovery, and, in some cases, project cost. There have been significant changes in the way we measure and model charge and gun performance in recent years. This combined with several emerging technologies have made the process of perforating optimization both more valid and more useful. Technology and modeling tools now make it possible to identify the optimum perforating scheme. Take advantage of the new modeling tools, methods of measuring perforator performance, and the latest perforating technology to make perforations deliver.
Primary Technical Discipline: DC
Mark Brinsden is Shell’s global perforating lead with 34 years of experience in well technology. Brinsden is the chair of the API perforating committee and cofounder of the International Perforating Forum. He is also involved in the development of several new gun systems.
Geomechanics and Fractured Reservoirs: Comforting, Confusing, or Scary?
Fractured reservoirs often exhibit interaction between production and effective permeability. Simple rules used to explain this relationship are based on assumptions that are physically impossible. Moving beyond this limitation requires a change of mind-set. By using simulation models and realistic conditions, where fractured rock masses and their contained fluids are suitably represented, the way in which coupled systems interact can be understood, leading to realistic upscaled responses. Many real-world fractured reservoirs may have fracture distributions and flow conditions that never raise any major surprises. However, in other parts of those reservoirs, confusing responses may appear because of the nonlinear geomechanics/fluid interactions, and some examples may demonstate seemingly unreasonable behaviors.
Primary Technical Discipline: RDD
Gary Couples is a professor of geomechanics at Heriot-Watt University's Institute of Petroleum Engineering, where he links geomechanical processes to their consequences. His research and teaching activities range from the pore scale to the reservoir scale and larger with an emphasis on predicting effective flow and other emergent phenomena.
Selective water-reduction systems with consistent, sustained performance have been pursued by the oil and gas industry for many years. A few systems are currently reporting success and alternate application in other areas, such as additives to fracturing fluids, diverters for acidizing treatments, and leak-off control agents. This presentation discusses the mechanisms of selective water-reduction systems, case histories for both water reduction and alternate applications, and how this class of compounds and their applications could potentially be improved for increased success in the future.
Primary Technical Discipline: PO
Larry Eoff is a chemist at Halliburton in Houston. He holds a BS in chemistry from the University of Central Arkansas and a PhD in organic chemistry from the University of Arkansas.
Stimulation processes in unconventional resources impose extreme loads on both producing formations and the wells used to access them. This lecture will examine the range of issues emerging from these processes and how the responses can be measured to help address the challenges and improve the performance of projects. This lecture will also focus on deformation mechanisms of unconventional resource development and demonstrate root causes of several deformation mechanisms. The topic extends beyond the well and how the well can be an instrument to gain insight into formation response to these new processes.
Primary Technical Discipline: DC
Trent Kaiser is a principal consultant at Noetic Engineering in Canada. A primary focus of his work has been on strain-based design for extreme oilfield applications. He is a lead developer and presenter of numerous training courses for unconventional resources. Kaiser earned BS, MS, and PhD degrees in mechanical engineering and has numerous publications, including more than 30 patents.
Unconventional reservoirs are just that—unconventional. Extrapolation of techniques that have been used in conventional reservoirs to unconventional reservoirs is dangerous and can prevent further development by providing poor results. In order to avoid such misapplications, unconventional reservoirs call for unconventional thought processes. There is no place this is more evident than in hydraulic fracturing in which a different mind-set has to be developed, not just for unconventional reservoirs in general, but specifically for each type of individual system. This presentation reviews the changing perspectives and design considerations. The main “takeaway” is that unconventional reservoirs have requirements very different and distinct from conventional reservoirs and designs can be improved by considering these unique requirements.
Primary Technical Discipline: PO
Jennifer Miskimins is a senior consulting engineer at Barree & Associates where she specializes in stimulation treatment design and analysis and teaches short courses. Before joining Barree, she was an associate professor at the Colorado School of Mines. Miskimins holds a BS, MS, and PhD in petroleum engineering.
This lecture discusses acid fracturing stimulation in deep hard carbonates and etching patterns. Laboratory tests were performed to verify whether an acid-induced fracture can withstand the high effective normal stresses acting in such reservoirs. Many published results from small, wet sawed, and leveled carbonate rock samples support the claim that different acid etching patterns determine different conductivity behavior. However, hydraulic fractures are tensile fractures and they are naturally rough. Experimental results show that after acid reaction, roughness of tensile fractures can have more, equal, or less roughness than before acid reaction.
Primary Technical Discipline: PO
Luis F. Neumann is the technical adviser for stimulation and sand control at Petrobras. He has more than 25 years of experience pumping wellbore fluids at fracturing pressures using hydraulic, acid fracturing, and frac-pack techniques in vertical, deviated, and horizontal subsea wells.
A Step Change in Traditional Risk Assessment Techniques for Process Safety and Asset Integrity Management
The oil and gas industry has recognized process safety and asset integrity as key drivers for maximizing asset performance and preventing major accident hazards, which results in the preservation of human lives, the environment, and assets. This lecture discusses the possibility of overcoming limitations of standard risk assessment techniques with a new tool called BAseline Risk Assessment Tool (BART). The tool represents a step change in traditional risk assessment because it combines two mature methodologies, quality risk assessment and bow-tie analysis, to assess process safety hazards as well as analyze the existing safety barriers and their contribution to risk prevention and mitigation. Basic process safety concepts will be presented to the audience, and the rationale and features of BART will be discussed and compared with existing techniques.
Primary Technical Discipline: HSSESR
Annamaria Petrone works as a senior safety engineer for Eni E&P. She has 10 years of experience in the oil and gas industry. Her professional skills include risk assessment, process safety, and maintenance. Petrone holds an MS in civil engineering and a post-university master in reliability availability and maintenance.
For the unprepared, liquid slugs in multiphase pipelines can have disastrous consequences, including increased corrosion, production impairment, compressor damage, flooding of separators, and damage to process equipment. The key to avoiding problems with slugging in pipelines is to determine the type and magnitude of the slug now and into the future. This lecture will outline procedures for handling and modeling each of the four types of slug using both steady state and transient modeling tools. Once the kind and size of slug is determined, then the appropriate steps can be taken to avoid problems.
Primary Technical Discipline: PO
Mona Trick is a licensed profession engineer and an adviser for the SPT Group, a Schlumberger company. For the past 30 years, she has advised clients on handling slug flow and modeling and matching multiphase wellbore and pipeline pressure losses. She earned a BS in mechanical engineering from the University of Calgary.
Production of shale gas requires large volumes of water for preparing drilling and fracturing fluids. Following the completion of the fracturing job, some of the injected water returns to the surface as flowback and produced water and must be managed appropriately. This lecture discusses water availability for several major US shale plays and describes the types of water management technologies and practices used in North America for flowback and produced water.
Primary Technical Discipline: HSSESR
John Veil is the president of Veil Environmental. He has written many reports and given numerous presentations on produced water, flowback water, hydraulic fracturing, and shale gas. Veil has 33 years of experience in water management.
Most natural gas reserves are considered as stranded because of a lack of adequate and diversified transportation. Gas can be transported with on-land pipelines, but it becomes very expensive with underwater pipelines. The main alternative is liquefied natural gas. Other options include compressed natural gas and gas-to-liquids. For compressed natural gas, the development of composite material containers has proven to be a game changer, and gas-to-liquids has changed over the years from diesel and jet fuel to alcohols. This lecture presents new information from recent experiences and attempts to provide a methodology of technical and economic optimization for the transportation of natural gas. Worldwide demand for natural gas is expected to force the issue because of massive new needs headed by China.
Primary Technical Discipline: PFC
Xiuli Wang is vice president and chief technology officer of XGas and an adjunct professor at the University of Houston. She is the lead author of the book, Advanced Natural Gas Engineering, and a contributing author to Modern Fracturing—Enhancing Natural Gas Production. Wang holds a PhD in chemical engineering.
The Arctic continental shelf is believed to be the area with the highest unexplored potential for oil and gas. Despite a common view that the Arctic has plentiful hydrocarbon resources, there are ongoing debates regarding the potential of this region as a future energy supply base. Driving forces for such discussions are geopolitics, environmental concern, assessment and delineation of Arctic resources, technology available for their successful development, and the market demand for energy supply. This lecture examines the future role of the Arctic region in addressing the evolving energy demands.
Primary Technical Discipline: PO
Anatoly Zolotukhin is a professor at the Gubkin Russian State University of Oil and Gas. He serves as deputy chancellor on international affairs and is a director of the Institute for Arctic Oil and Gas Technologies. Zolotukhin earned an MS in applied mathematics and an MS and a PhD in petroleum engineering.
This presentation will describe the well-management process used by Petrobras to design and drill exploratory wells. The case of an offshore well drilled in a remote area of the Black Sea will be examined. Ranked as a well of the highest complexity level, the drilling of this ultra deepwater wildcat well has faced a number of expected hazards, such as the presence of shallow gas zones, long abnormally pressurized intervals, and low fracture pressure gradient sections.
Primary Technical Discipline: DC
Luiz Alberto Santos Rocha has worked for Petrobras for more than 32 years. He is currently the Senior Advisor of the International Drilling Group. He holds degrees in mechanical engineering and MBA both from the Pontíficia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro. He also holds a Ph.D. degree in Petroleum Engineering from Louisiana State University (LSU).
While remote parts of the world are awash with hundreds of Tcf of natural gas, the industrialized West and emerging economies of the East cannot get enough of the clean-burning, environmentally friendly fuel. This presentation will provide an overview of natural gas liquefaction facilities, from inlet gas receiving to liquefied natural gas (LNG) storage and loading. However, the focus is on the liquefaction process and equipment.
Primary Technical Discipline: PFC
Mike Choi is a process engineering fellow in ConocoPhillips’ Global Production Department in Houston. His specialties are production facilities, sour gas treating, and LNG.
Methods and Workflows to Process Dynamic Data in Intelligent Fields
In the past years well tests have been complemented and partly replaced by a variety of tools that provide dynamic rate, pressure, and temperature data at various scales. Well Test Interpretation has also progressed into a variety of methods to analyze pressure and rate data, using increasingly sophisticated models. With Intelligent Fields, the demand is to move towards a workflow that will also address permanent data proliferation and information overload. This lecture provides a holistic description of past, present and future solutions around these issues.
Primary Technical Discipline: RDD
Olivier Houzé holds an engineering degree from Ecole Polytechnique and an MS degree in petroleum engineering from Stanford University. He is the incoming SPE Technical Director for Reservoir Description & Dynamics for 2012–2015.
Shale Resources Assessment – A Full Life Cycle Integrated Approach
Key issues and uncertainties in shale resource development are resolved as plays move from resource assessment to full scale development utilizing a full life-cycle integrated approach essential for value creation and ensuring growth in production and reserves. The design, planning, and implementation of systematic and scalable Field Demonstrations are essential elements required to address strategic, development, and operational issues. Mechanistic studies are used to understand the key production drivers. This presentation demonstrates the application of new processes and advances which are key to appraisal and development of global shale resources.
Primary Technical Discipline: RDD
Pankaj Kumar (PK) Pande is director of reservoir technology / reservoir characterization for Anadarko Petroleum Corporation. His responsibilities include managing an integrated team of subsurface professionals in application of subsurface technologies and best practices for deepwater and unconventional resources worldwide.
Advanced Drilling Solutions
The presentation will discuss the various types of drilling dynamics related issues which contribute to poor performance. A variety of methods to identify and mediate the primary cause of performance issues will also be addressed from proven methods.
Alan Clarke is a 15 year veteran in the oil industry with extensive background in a variety of drilling products, services, and training systems. He holds a BSc from Memorial University of Newfoundland’s earth Science department, and is currently the Director of Advanced Drilling Solutions for National Oilwell Varco.
Asphaltenes and associated production challenges still receive a lot of attention in the E&P operations. The key in tackling those challenges is to understand the diverse world of asphaltenes – their origin, changes to their chemical structure during generation and migration of hydrocarbons, and in consequence their behavior during production.
Dr. Artur Stankiewicz is Schlumberger’s Reservoir Fluids and Flow Assurance Domain Head, and Advisor Reservoir Fluids & Geochemistry.
Fiber-optic technology, although only introduced for use in E&P well and reservoir monitoring in the last ten years, has blossomed into a highly reliable set of tools which frequently offer monitoring capability not obtainable with traditional sensors which are either permanently installed or run as logging tools or via other intervention methods. This Distinguished Lecture will provide an overview of optical sensing techniques and sensors such as distributed temperature sensing (DTS), optical pressure gauges, distributed strain measurement for integrity monitoring and distributed acoustic sensing, describe various deployment methods and discuss examples which illustrate the role of fiber-optic monitoring in well and reservoir management.
Dr. Dennis Dria, Petroleum Technology Advisor and President of Myden Energy Consulting, PLLC, has more than 20 years of experience with Shell, most recently working as a Staff Research Engineer in the areas of fiber-optic technology development, fiber-optic data management and integration and technology implementation for well and reservoir monitoring, and as Shell's Global Subject Matter Expert for production logging and permanent sensing.
This lecture presents a discussion of the key characteristics of shale reservoirs and their impact on the performances of fractured horizontal wells. Examples are presented to highlight common practices and discuss performance interpretation problems.
Erdal Ozkan is a professor of Petroleum Engineering and co-director of Marathon Center of Excellence for Reservoir Studies at Colorado School of Mines.
By integrating surface and downhole data with dynamic drilling models and the rig's drilling machines we can automate and optimize the drilling process occurring below the rotary table. This presentation outlines the current industry efforts to implement automation tools for conventional rigs as well as high-end deepwater units and examines the changing roles within the drilling team.
Fred Florence is a Product Champion at National Oilwell Varco (NOV) and is the current chairman of SPE’s Drilling Systems Automation Technical Section (DSATS).
Managed Pressure Drilling-MPD, from the core concept point of view, is a collection of drilling optimization techniques, when correctly designed, planned and applied, will improve the overall drilling performance and mitigate risks. MPD is a step-change technique that increases recoverable assets, reduces NPT, enhances safety and reduces the total drilling cost.
Hani Qutob is the Reservoir Engineering Manager for Weatherford “Well Engineering Centre of Excellence” – Middle East and North Africa. Hani has 30 years of diversified international experience in the oil & Gas industry and was the SPE Distinguished Lecturer for the 2007-2008 Season.
This presentation discusses the state of the art in openhole sand control completions, reviewing the evolution of developments in the last decade, highlighting recent advancements and the gaps for future work towards healthier sand control completions in openhole environments.
Mehmet Parlar is a Technical Advisor for Schlumberger Sand Management Services, based in Houston, Texas
This presentation disseminates the integration of state-of-the-art engineering approaches, innovative technical initiatives and new technologies in optimum hydrocarbon exploitation plan from the oil rim reservoirs. The applied fundamentals, critical elements and proven practices for effective reservoir management and hydrocarbon recovery enhancement efforts with lower cost are elaborated through various successful real case studies.
With over 14 years of industrial and academic work experiences, Dr Rahim Masoudi is currently a Principal Reservoir Engineer for Petroleum Resource Development in PETRONAS, and also Adjunct Professor in University Technology PETRONAS.
The lecture will address the approaches to preventing/mitigating these mechanisms which involve excellent well planning, real-time monitoring as well as sound drilling practices
Dr. Samuel O. Osisanya is an Associate Professor of Petroleum Engineering at the Mewbourne School of Petroleum and Geological Engineering at the University of Oklahoma in Norman, Oklahoma, USA for 19 years, where he teaches all aspects of well construction technology and had practical field experience with Gulf (now Chevron), Shell-BP and Mobil (now ExxxonMobil).
This presentation exposes a common misunderstanding about the true nature of uncertainty – the fact that it is in our heads, not in the systems we deal with. This has profound implications for uncertainty assessment.
Steve Begg is a Professor at the Australian School of Petroleum where his teaching and research focus is on asset and portfolio investment decision-making under uncertainty. He holds a PhD in Geophysics and a BSc in geological geophysics from Reading University.
EOR has not been present in the offshore; while applications present logistical as well as technical challenges, the offshore represents a large EOR opportunity. To achieve and exceed the expectations of EOR's contribution to supply, innovative political and commercial approaches are needed; for example, agreements regarding CO2 capture and transportation, NOCs and IOCs sharing the risk as well as the reward in EOR applications.
Paul Bondor retired from Shell after 35 years of technical and supervisory service. He holds BS, MS, and PhD degrees from Case Institute of Technology.
This presentation covers carbon management, sustainable development, global requirements, trends & initiatives. The carbon strategy devolves around company’s own perspective on the global issues of climate change mitigation, adaptation & offsetting.
A.B. Chakraborty, Chevening fellow, University of Cambridge 2009, is currently the Chief – Carbon Management Group in ONGC & deals with CDM projects development, climate change and sustainable development strategy. He has BE (Mech.), MTech, MBA, MSc (environmental science) and PG diplomas in environmental management/economics.
Advanced Geosteering Methods for Optimal Recovery of Hydrocarbon Reserves
This presentation addresses the new technologies that continue to emerge to help geologists, drillers, and reservoir engineers make well-informed geosteering decisions.
Roland Chemali is Chief Petrophysicist with Halliburton-Sperry Drilling Services. He holds engineering degrees from the Ecole Polytechnique of Paris and the French Petroleum Institute IFP.
Putting the Focus on Data
This presentation focuses on data as a critical business asset that drives decisions on where to invest, when to divest and how to operate more efficiently. Management of data in silos is discussed.
Jim Crompton holds the position of Manager of Upstream Architecture in the Chevron Global Upstream IT organization. He earned a BS in geophysical eng., MS in geophysics from the Colorado School of Mines and an MBA from Our Lady of the Lake University.
This presentation illustrates that well barrier problems are not limited to being internal and deep in the well and require expensive (i.e., rig) methods to repair. Inexpensive repair approaches "outside the box" of traditional methods can be done safely, reduce risk and provide economic value for the company.
Jerald C. Dethlefs is a Well Integrity and Diagnostics Engineer with ConocoPhillips in the Global Completions and Production Engineering Group in Houston, Texas. He has a BSc in general engineering, an Ms in civil engineering and an MBA.
This presentation includes several examples to illustrate the power of real time monitoring and interpretation and argues that real-time monitoring and control is required to ensure that the critical formation testing objectives are met on any exploration, appraisal or otherwise high profile project.
Hani Elshahawi leads FEAST, Shell’s Fluid Evaluation and Sampling Technologies center of excellence, which is responsible for the planning, execution and analysis of global high profile formation testing and fluid sampling operations. He has a BSc in mechanical engineering and an MSc in petroleum engineering from the University of Texas at Austin.
Research in nanotechnology is giving new insight into why the asphaltenes interact with each other, enabling new approaches to remove unwanted contaminants, to develop new catalysts, and possibly to enable synthesis of new materials derived from heavy oil. A wide range of new upgrading technologies have been proposed, but insight into the behavior of heavy oil at the nanometer scale allows us to analyze which of these approaches can be cheaper than current commercial technology, and which ones are unlikely to succeed.
Murray Gray has over 20 years of research experience in upgrading of heavy oil and oil sands bitumen. He is currently Director of the Centre for Oil Sands Innovation at the University of Alberta. He obtained his PhD in chemical engineering from the California Institute of Technology in 1984. He also holds an MEng degree with a specialization in petroleum engineering from the University of Calgary (1980) and a BSc in chemical engineering (with honours) from the University of Toronto (1978).
This presentation highlights the areas that need to be tackled in order to make intelligent well technologies relevant to mature fields, and to make these technologies more effective in general. Focus is on the measures that can be realistically achieved in the course of the next 10 years.
Younes Jalali is a Reservoir Engineering Advisor with Schlumberger. He holds BS and MS degrees from the University of Tulsa and a PhD from the University of Southern California, all in petroleum engineering.
The first part of the presentation describes the steam-based thermal recovery processes, in terms of recovery efficiency and environmental impact. The second part of the presentation describes a new heavy oil recovery technology that has been developed not only to maximize the performance but also to minimize the environmental impact.
David Law is currently the Schlumberger Heavy Oil Technical Director in North America with offices located at both the DBR Technology Centre in Edmonton and the Heavy Oil Regional Technology Centre in Calgary, Alberta, Canada. He holds a BSc degree from the National Taiwan University in Taipei, Taiwan, and MSc and PhD degrees from the University of Alberta in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, all in chemical engineering.
This presentation identifies the various “stages” of optimizing a gas lifted production project and reviews recent advances in equipment, software and concepts which are changing the way gas lift is applied and engineered. The importance of suitable surveillance, data acquisition and management systems will be stressed.
Rick Lemanczyk has served as the Principal Petroleum Engineer in Senergy’s Asia Pacific operations, located in Kuala Lumpur, since 2006. He holds a PhD in chemistry from Oxford.
Diagnostic injection tests can provide information on reservoir characteristics; and reserve recoveries can be enhanced through practices such as improved well spacing and reorientation of fracturing treatments. This presentation reviews these changing perspectives and design considerations.
Jennifer L. Miskimins is an Associate Professor in the Petroleum Engineering Department at the Colorado School of Mines (CSM) in Golden, Colorado, USA. She holds BS, MS and PhD degrees in petroleum engineering.
Let’s Model It! 3D Geoscience Modeling: Implications for Reserves Estimation and Field Development Planning
This presentation reviews the geoscience modeling as an initializing technology for reservoir simulation and from the perspective of key deliverables such as recoverable volumes. By correctly identifying rock that contributes to flow and honoring scale issues, the link between 3D geoscience and engineering models becomes more seamless, a benefit that is manifested through more readily attainable history matches.
Douglas Peacock is a Senior Geoscientist with Gaffney, Cline & Associates. He holds a BSc in geological sciences from Leeds University, UK, and an MSc in petroleum geology from Imperial College, London.
This presentation reviews a series of case studies to demonstrate how the challenge of effectively managing international SE programs can impact development projects and how applying the Next Generation Stakeholder Engagement can help meet this challenge. It provides recommendations for how to improve capacity building activities and optimize opportunities for local involvement, and ultimately success, in stakeholder consultation.
Dean Slocum, SPE, is the Principal and founder of Acorn International and a former director of the energy and environment practices of Arthur D. Little and Battelle Memorial Institute. He has a Bachelors degree in sociology and a Masters degree in public administration/health.
The Determination Of Minimum Tested Volume And Future Well Production From The Deconvolution Of Well Test Pressure Transients
The use of the derivative is now a standard technique in pressure transient analysis. Deconvolution is a more recent method that, thanks to improvements in the algorithms, is becoming accepted practice. The combination of these two powerful methods has significant implications on how pressure transient data can be analyzed. Before attempting to find a plethora of models that fit the observed data, there is much information that can be obtained from the data directly.
Tim Whittle is a Group Technical Authority for pressure transient testing at BG-Group in Reading, UK. He has a Masters degree in engineering science from Cambridge University, England, and has worked in the oil industry for more than 25 years.
This presentation will review current procedures and provides important new developments from shallow to ultradeepwater scenarios and regarding infill drilling projects for mature fields. A comparison of technologies will be provided based upon impact upon well productivity or injectivity.
Agostinho Calderon is a senior adviser in the completion, sand control, and stimulation, engineering team for Petrobras E&P Services in Brazil. He earned a B.S. degree in civil engineering from State University of Rio de Janeiro and a Post Graduation Course in petroleum engineering from Petrobras University.
This presentation will give an illustration of new improvements with two examples, a successful polymer flood project implemented in a heavy oil reservoir, and a successful water shutoff/sand consolidation treatment by microgels in an underground gas storage well.
Alain Zaitoun is vice president of Poweltec. He earned a PhD degree in chemical engineering from University of Nancy, France.
This presentation focuses on the application of latest design, chemicals, software, and equipment technology for drilling and completing in challenging scenarios.
Andre Leibsohn Martins is a senior consultant in the well technology sector at the Petrobras R&D Center. He earned BS and DSc degrees in chemical engineering from the federal University of Rio de Janeiro and an MSc degree in petroleum engineering from Campinas State University.
This lecture explores the vital role that oil and gas have played and will continue to play in providing energy to the world’s burgeoning masses. This lecture will examine the urgency and challenge of extending petroleum-derived energy to more people, further into the future, with minimal environmental impact.
Ben Ebenhack is a senior lecturer in the chemical engineering department at the University of Rochester, board chair of the Access to Energy for African Development (AHEAD) Energy Corporation, and principal investigator for the sustainability and global energy systems (SAGES) project. He earned an M.S. degree in 1984 from the University of Wyoming.
Environmental Performance in the Oil and Gas Exploration & Production Industry: Assessment and Challenges
Companies need to collect and report on their environmental performances for various reasons. Efforts made at either national level, regional, or international level have been efficient but the quality of the data still needs to be improved and additional data are to be collected to meet stakeholders expectations and the need of the industry.
Emmanuel Garland is a special adviser to the health, safety, and environment vice president, at Total E&P. He earned an engineering degree from the École Centrale de Paris and a petroleum engineering degree from the École Nationale des Pétroles et des Moteurs, Paris.
Loss of drilling fluid to the formation is one of the costliest problems that drillers face during well construction. Current technology enables a comprehensive approach that includes this remediative method but gives greater emphasis to preventing lost circulation.
Fred Growcock is senior technical adviser for M-I SWACO in Houston. He earned PhD and MS degrees in physical chemistry from New Mexico State University, and BA and BS degrees in chemistry from the University of Texas at Austin.
This presentation will focus on key stimulation issues associated with gas shale reservoirs and how to determine the appropriate completion methodology.
George Waters is an engineering adviser for Schlumberger Data & Consulting Services in Oklahoma City. He earned a BS degree in petroleum engineering from West Virginia University, an MS degree in environmental engineering from Oklahoma State University, and an MS degree in petroleum engineering from Institut Francais du Petrole.
This presentation will disseminate the mechanisms of water production and their effect on production decline in horizontal wells. Key problems and challenges in developing viable water shut-off (WSO) solutions for the various horizontal well completions will also be discussed.
Keng Seng Chan is a Principal Reservoir Engineer for the Petroleum Management Unit at Petronas in Malaysia. He earned BS and MS degrees in physics from the University of Rangoon, and MS and PhD degrees in chemical engineering from the University of Florida.
This presentation will attempt to demystify many of the legends of formation damage and their evaluation. New examples will be presented of the process of understanding and avoiding damage.
Michael Byrne is principal formation damage consultant for Senergy. He earned a BSc degree in Geology and Mathematics from University College Dublin.
Calibrating Permeability with Production Logs: A Breakthrough in Carbonate Reservoir Characterization
A step change improvement can be made to the predictive accuracy of a carbonate reservoir flow simulator by using production-logging tools (PLTs) calibrated permeability to construct the geologic model. The improvement is most dramatic in carbonate reservoirs exhibiting problematic excess permeability due to fractures and vuggy porosity.
Michael J. Sullivan is reservoir surveillance coordinator for the Tengiz field in Kazakhstan. He earned an honors degree in Petroleum Engineering from Montana Tech.
This presentation will discuss the factors that affect the economic optimization of a well completion for the factory approach and how they are currently being addressed, with focus on the Rocky Mountain region of North America.
Mike Eberhard is technical manager for Halliburton’s Rocky Mountain area. He earned a BS degree in mechanical engineering from Montana State University.
This presentation will look at how the sand face completion design has impacted the Sakhalin Phase II project. Developments with Shell’s fully integrated sand failure prediction tool enabled the sand volumes to be quantified and used for the first time during completion selection in Shell. The results predicted that unmanageable sand volumes would occur upon start-up, for open hole completions with pre-drilled liners (PDL).
Mike Gunningham is the Lunskoye lead production technologist of Sakhalin Energy. He earned a 1st class degree in chemical engineering from Bradford University and an MSc degree in petroleum engineering from Imperial College.
Examining Our Assumptions – Have Oversimplifications Jeopardized Our Ability To Design Optimal Fracture Treatments?
The primary message of this presentation is that unrecognized opportunities exist to improve well profitability. Challenging our misconceptions and examining actual field production has yielded techniques to improve fracture designs, despite the failure of our simplistic models to recognize those opportunities.
Michael C. Vincent is a Consulting Engineer for Insight Consulting. He earned a Bachelor’s degree in Chemical Engineering and Petroleum Refining from Colorado School of Mines.
This presentation will show important aspects related to well control safety that have been conducted in Brazil by Petrobras that result in an almost 10-year period without a blowout event in drilling operations. This presentation will focus on research and development projects that have been conducted in Brazil on well safety especially in deepwater environment.
Otto Luiz Alcantara Santos is coordinator of the well construction area of Petrobras University, the coordinator of well control training and certification program of Petrobras, instructor of drilling technologies at Petrobras University and senior technical adviser of Petrobras. He earned a MS degree from Colorado School of Mines and a PhD degree from Louisiana State University, both in petroleum engineering.
Hydraulic fracturing is used in most of the major cased hole sand control techniques today. With more than 15 years of use in the industry it is time to assess its impact and its future.
Raymond Tibbles is a sand control adviser for Schlumberger Oilfield Services based in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. He earned a BSc degree in chemical engineering from Michigan Technological University.
Interpretation of permanent downhole gauge data is a new problem. Permanent downhole gauges are being applied widely now, yet there is still much to be done to capitalize fully on all the advantages they can offer.
Roland N. Horne is Thomas Davies Barrow Professor of Earth Sciences and Professor of Energy Resources Engineering, at Stanford University. He earned a PhD degree in Engineering Science and a DSc degree in Engineering, both from the University of Auckland, New Zealand.
The development of reliable inspection technology provides another key to coiled tubing (CT) reliability. Magnetic flux leakage is the most common technique for finding flaws in CT. However, research is underway to adapt 3D laser imaging NDE. Output from such techniques is directly compatible with software that can quantify defect severity in real time.
Steven M. Tipton is the Frank W. Murphy Distinguished Professor of mechanical engineering at the University of Tulsa. He earned PhD and MS degrees from Stanford University and a BS degree from Oklahoma State University, all in mechanical engineering.
Effects of Complex Reservoir Geometries and Completion Practices on Production Analysis in Tight Gas Reservoirs
This lecture will demonstrate the effects of stress dependent permeability, radial composit reservoirs, and multi-layered reservoirs on the results obtained from production analysis. The completion issues addressed will include hydraulic fracture cleanup, fracture conductivity reduction and liquid loading.
Stuart Cox is a senior technical consultant with Marathon Oil’s Technology Services organization in Houston. He earned a BS degree in petroleum engineering from the University of Tulsa.
The Role of Oil and Gas in the Energy Mix of the Next 100 Years: Shifts in Demand, Supply, and Utilization of Energy
The global production curve for oil and gas will most likely resemble a long plateau with a serrated surface, tilted towards the year 2100. Oil and natural gas--so dominant in 2004 with 63%--should still be important in absolute terms in 2100, but with a much smaller relative share (about 15%) of the total energy mix.
Wolfgang E. Schollnberger is an international energy adviser and former technology vice president of BP. He earned a PhD degree in geology from the University of Vienna.
Improving Drilling Performance by Applying Advanced Dynamics Models
Drilling dynamics models play an important role in drilling performance optimization. These models can be classified as engineering tools or research tools, depending on functionality. Case studies from disparate drilling applications around the world have demonstrated that performance can be improved by applying lessons learned from advanced dynamics models.
Mark Dykstra is a Senior Staff Well Engineer for Shell International Exploration and Production in Houston, Texas. His current focus is Drilling Efficiency Optimization. Former positions include Director of Research and Director of Product Development for Hughes Christensen, focusing on rolling and fixed cutter drilling products and including tricone bits, polycrystalline diamond compact bits, natural diamond bits, impregnated bits, eccentric reamers, expandable reamers, and casing drilling bits. Dykstra earned BS, MS, and PhD degrees in petroleum engineering from the University of Tulsa.
Recommendations for Designing Nondamaging Acid Stimulation Fluids for Oil and Gas Bearing Reservoirs
This lecture presents and discusses the chemistry of acid additives, the damage that may be caused by wrong choice acid additives, the formulation of acids, certain mineralogy concerns, and the tests required to ensure the quality of the acid pumped. Pumping nondamaging acids has applicability not only to Canadian oil and gas wells, but to all producing fields worldwide.
Malcolm Knopp is Senior Acidizing Specialist with BJ Services Company Canada. He earned a BS degree in chemistry from the University of East Anglia at Norwich, England, and has been a part-time instructor at the Canadian Petroleum Institute.
Cements and Cementing: An Old Technique With a Future?
Alternative isolation techniques have been introduced for either complementing or even suppressing the need for well cementing. Tailored cements range from basic to highly technical ones to fit almost any well requirement. The versatility and adaptability of these cement based solutions to fit well “cementing” needs make it a key element in today’s well architecture, as wells can be designed differently taking into consideration the properties of these new cementing materials.
Bernard Piot is a Technical Adviser and Cementing Project Manager in the Schlumberger Riboud Product Center. He works on short-term engineering projects aimed at extending the scope and widening the applications of current commercial well cementing technology. Piot earned an engineering degree in chemistry from Ecole Européenne de Chimie Polymères et Matériaux de Strasbourg.
This presentation discusses a stepwise approach to evaluating the potential for fines production, ways to address the issue; and appraise the overall impact on the life cycle and operating costs of the well. Several case histories are presented to illustrate how it is possible to address problems related to the movement of formation fines.
David Underdown is a Senior Adviser for Chevron Energy Technology. He earned a PhD degree in physical chemistry from the University of Houston. Underdown is current Chairperson of the API Task Force on Perforating.
As there is a global imperative to reduce CO2 emissions, this opportunity is also available to other countries with significant coal-fired electricity generation and an indigenous oil industry. This lecture includes policy background, plans by utility companies, sources and sinks for CO2, the EOR opportunity, infrastructure requirements, and engineering challenges.
David S. Hughes is Technical Head Carbon Storage for Senergy. He is a reservoir engineer with 27 years of experience. Hughes edits the online periodical Improved Oil Recovery Views. He earned a BS degree in physics from the University of Surrey.
Produced Water Management Options – One Size Does Not Fit All
This lecture describes many produced water management options using the concept of a 3-tiered water management/pollution prevention hierarchy: minimize water production, recycle or reuse, and treat and dispose. This lecture offers guidance on the factors that should be considered by company managers to select the management options that are most appropriate for a particular site.
John Veil is Manager of the Water Policy Program for Argonne National Laboratory. He earned a BA degree in earth and planetary science from Johns Hopkins University, an MS degree in zoology from the University of Maryland, and an MS degree in civil engineering from the University of Maryland. Veil served as a faculty member of the Department of Zoology at the University of Maryland. He is the lead author of the 2004 “White Paper Describing Produced Water from Production of Crude Oil, Natural Gas, and Coal Bed Methane.”
How the business risks/issues of CO2 enhanced oil recovery (EOR) project are handled can make or break a project. Understanding such risks and the measures businesses must take to quantify and minimize them will go a long way to ensure a project is both a technical and an economic success.
Ken R. Brown is Manager of the Carbon and Energy Management Group at the Alberta Research Council. He is a professional engineer with 36 years of experience in reservoir engineering, project management, production engineering, operations engineering, facilities engineering, environmental engineering, and all aspects of technical management of large multi-disciplinary teams.
This lecture focuses on the importance and value of well-defined collaborative multidisciplinary, multicultural, and integrated studies executed seamlessly over the entire upstream business units of a typical oil and gas company. It is not only essential for running a successful petroleum business enterprise, but also necessary for its long-term survival.
Yasin Senturk is a Principal Professional of Petroleum En gineering and Development for Saudi Aramco. He earned a BS degree in petroleum engineering from Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey, an MS degree in petroleum engineering and an ME degree in industrial engineering both from the University of Alberta, and an MS degree in economics from the University of Oklahoma. Senturk advises Saudi Aramco Management and the Petroleum Ministry in his areas of expertise.
This presentation discusses how to avoid pitfalls in assessing artificial lift run-life performance based on concrete examples to help operators and service companies better understand the issues and be in a better position to select the best run-life measures for their particular situation in both onshore and offshore applications.
Francisco Alhanati is Director E&P at C-FER Technologies. He earned a BS degree in civil engineering from Instituto Militar de Engenharia, an MS degree in mechanical engineering from the Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, and a PhD degree in petroleum engineering from the University of Tulsa.
This lecture presents several field cases of the injectivity damage mitigation and consequent well and water management strategies: water treatment for seawater flooding and produced water re-injection, disposal of produced water in aquifers, waterflood design accounting for injectivity impairment for new fields, raw-water injection, subsurface separation, injectivity with heavy oils and low consolidated sands, applications of horizontal, perforated, gravel-packed and fractured wells.
Pavel Bedrikovetsky is chairperson–petroleum at Adelaide University. He holds an MS degree in applied mathematics, a PhD degree in fluid mechanics, and a DS degree in reservoir engineering from Moscow Oil–Gas Gubkin University.
Hydraulic fracturing has been described as one of the three most significant technologies to be developed in the upstream oil and gas industry in the last 50 years. The successful application of hydraulic fracturing to mature oil and gas reservoirs is about recognizing that there is a wide range of appropriate solutions available. A number of case histories are used to illustrate the effectiveness of these techniques, when they are systematically applied.
Anthony Martin is Business Development Manager for International
Stimulation. He teaches fracturing, acidizing, and sand control, both in-house
and externally, to customers. Martin is author of BJ Services’ Hydraulic
Fracturing Manual. He graduated from Imperial College, London, with an
degree in mechanical engineering and an MS degree in petroleum engineering.
In Colombia’s Cusiana and Cupiaga fields, initial well rates were disappointing, mostly because of a combination of difficult perforating conditions and significant drilling induced damage. A team was formed to determine if and how BP could fracture stimulate in the most effective manner possible. This team proposed a number of solutions for both the fields that were subsequently implemented. Issues that were addressed included coping with well deviation/azimuth, rigorous prefrac wellbore preparation, novel fracstring deployment, fracturing and an efficient remedial stacking of fracs.
Martin Rylance is a Senior Petroleum Engineer and Engineering Adviser for BP Exploration. He earned a BS degree in pure mathematics from the University of Salford. Rylance is also a fellow of the Institute of Mathematics in London.
Cutoffs in Gas Reservoirs and Their Implications in Reservoir Simulation
There is great confusion over the implementation of cutoffs in industry because of the absence of clear-cut agreed-upon values among geologists, production, and reservoir simulation engineers. Cutoffs are limiting values for petrophysical properties aiming to define productive zones across the reservoir for development.
A.A. Al-Hamadah is Supervisor of the Gas Area Studies Unit in the Reservoir Simulation Division, Reservoir Description and Simulation Department for Saudi Aramco. He earned a BS degree from King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals and MS and PhD degrees from the University of Texas at Austin, all in petroleum engineering.
Optimizing Asset Design – Cradle To Grave– by Bridging the Gap Between the Earth Science and Engineering Disciplines Using Mechanical Earth-Modeling Technology
As the geological and geophysical modeling work of the explorationists matures, and the subsurface picture becomes clearer, well systems design optimization is being achieved by well engineers using mechanical earth-model technology. This lecture introduces acoustics-based rock mechanics concepts, describes Chevron’s acoustics-based rock property prediction technique, and presents field application case histories for selected business units worldwide, including deepwater Gulf of Mexico, North Sea, offshore West Africa, and Asia.
Harvey E. Goodman is a staff research consultant for Chevron’s Energy Technology Company. He was appointed Chevron Fellow in October 2007. Goodman is an adjunct professor at the University of Missouri–Rolla (UMR). He was awarded an honorary professional degree in petroleum engineering by UMR, where he also earned BS and MS degrees in geological engineering.
This lecture on how a major operator has used pressure-transient analysis (PTA) over the past 20 years, particularly in expensive, deepwater developments, will enable petroleum engineers to make better choices about how they should appraise and survey their own oil and gas reservoirs.
Robert H. Hite is Principal Technical Expert and a Reservoir Engineering Adviser for Shell. He consults on PTA for Shell’s worldwide operations and is the primary reservoir engineering instructor for Shell’s well-testing classes. Hite earned a BS degree in chemical engineering from Georgia Institute of Technology and a PhD degree in chemical engineering from Rice University.
Kutubu is Papua New Guinea’s largest oil field. It came on line in 1992 and
achieved peak rates in 1993 before decline began in 1994. A follow up
development campaign, along with other projects, has for 4 years completely halted the production decline. The field now appears to have a considerable remaining life of up to 2 decades. This lecture’s main conclusion is that we regularly need to go back to basics and establish whether or not our fundamental assumptions are supported by solid evidence.
Neil Williams is currently in charge of the reservoir engineering, geoscience, planning, and development of the Kutubu field for Oil Search. He earned a BS degree from Sydney University in applied mathematics, and a PhD degree in fluid mechanics from the University of New South Wales.
This lecture presents the framework used by BP to implement and manage well-integrity programs and discusses the Prudhoe Bay well-integrity-management system. Well integrity has received increasing attention from all aspects of the petroleum industry. Lessons learned from the Alaska implementation are discussed, including data-management systems and several case histories.
Joe Anders is a Senior Wells Project Engineer for BP in Alaska with more than 24 years of operational oilfield experience. He earned a BS degree in geological engineering and an MS degree in petroleum engineering. Anders also holds a patent for an enhanced-oil-recovery (EOR) process.
The prevention and remediation of several flow-assurance problems require timely knowledge about the internal-deposition conditions of pipelines, sealines, and tubings. Techniques carried out by measuring and analyzing pressure signals induced by fast flow-rate changes constitute an extremely flexible, sensitive, and easily applied methodology. The basic principles of the method are illustrated, together with case histories of onshore and offshore applications.
Alberto Di Lullo leads the Flow Assurance Technologies Program of the Engineering Department of the Eni E&P Division, which coordinates operational support, design activities and R&D projects. Alberto is also (co)author of several patents and publications.
Widespread access to detailed physical models and to low-cost, high-speed computing makes it possible to harness measurements of uncertainty to the task of improving field-development decisions of all types. This lecture illustrates the difficulties and pitfalls that can arise when history matching and prediction are performed deterministically with practical examples.
Neil Dunlop is a Director at Energy Scitech, a member of the Roxar Group, and a consultant who conducts reservoir studies. He earned an MS degree in petroleum engineering from Imperial College, London, and an MA degree in chemical engineering from Cambridge University.
This presentation draws on the application of numerical modeling, laboratory rock testing, and knowledge of the processes critical to shales and hydrate-bearing sediments to provide predictive tools for the stability of wellbores drilled in challenging formations. The lecture also touches on the application of geomechanical modeling and testing to the problem of sand-production prediction, an area of major concern to the oil industry.
Reem Freij-Ayoub is a civil engineer with MS and PhD degrees in geomechanics and rock mechanics from the University of Western Australia. She joined the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization to develop reactive transport models then pursued her interests in problems in petroleum geomechanics.
Prefrac Reservoir Characterization From Perforation Inflow Diagnostic (PID) Testing: “Measure Twice—Frac Once”
In an effort to enhance the deliverability potential of a tight gas well, operators sometimes overlook the “missing link” between stimulation design and the well’s post-frac production response. This presentation demonstrates that a properly designed and conducted closed-chamber PID test is a cost-effective, safe, and environmentally friendly method of obtaining critical prefrac reservoir parameters.
Robert Hawkes is Team Leader of Reservoir Services for BJ Services Company Canada. He began his career with Esso Resources. Since then, Hawkes went on to establish himself as a specialist in well-test analysis with Fekete Associates. He graduated from the Southern Alberta Institute of Technology with a diploma in petroleum engineering.
In these days of high oil prices and pressure to reduce production costs, there is an economic necessity to control, optimize, or eliminate the emulsion problem by maximizing oil/water separation. This presentation provides a summary of how emulsions form during oil production, the types of emulsions encountered, what stabilizes emulsions, and up-to-date methods for reducing emulsion-related problems.
Sunil Kokal is a PVT/reservoir fluid property consultant at the Saudi Aramco R&D Center. He is an expert in hydrocarbon phase behavior, crude-oil emulsions, and asphaltenes. Kokal earned a BS degree from the Indian Institute of Technology and a PhD degree from the University of Calgary, both in chemical engineering.
Injection of CO2 into depleted and near-depleted oil reservoirs offers the potential for increasing oil recovery while sequestering industrial emissions of CO2. This presentation examines how alternative technology designs and operating strategies may enable industry to improve CO2-EOR oil-recovery efficiencies significantly, from the traditional 8 to 12% of original oil in place (OOIP) to potentially more than 20% OOIP.
Vello A. Kuuskraa is President of Advanced Resources International. He earned an MBA degree from the University of Pennsylvania and a BS degree in applied mathematics/economics from North Carolina State University.
This presentation aims to design the concept of modeling the existing data into visualized tools to help predict the future. Engineers should use Monte Carlo simulation, decision trees, databases, expert systems, linear programming, design of experiments, and all types of artificial intelligence to state their uncertainties not as discrete values, but as continuous ranges.
Sameh Macary works with IPR Group of Companies. He is the Production Department Head and a petroleum engineering professor in the Egyptian Petroleum Research Institute. Macary earned MS and PhD degrees in production and reservoir engineering from the Azerbaijanian Institute of Oil and Chemistry.
This lecture outlines the potential threats to production and safety that oilfield scale may present if not managed appropriately and discusses the criteria for analyzing and selecting the optimum control strategy. The general approach is illustrated by several field examples on which the author has worked very closely with a number of international oil companies.
Eric Mackay is a research fellow at the Heriot-Watt University Institute of Petroleum Engineering, where his interests include the application of reservoir-engineering principles and data for better understanding of production issues. Mackay earned a BS degree in physics from the University of Edinburgh and a PhD degree in petroleum engineering from Heriot-Watt University.
Smart Completions, Smart Wells, and Now Smart Fields – Challenges Our Industry Faces and How To Overcome Them
This lecture asks what are the challenges that our industry faces in turning high-frequency data into information and knowledge that can be used to make decisions and consequently turn the decisions into action. To overcome these challenges, we have to use the technology that others have used in order to solve similar problems, successfully.
Shahab D. Mohaghegh is a professor of petroleum and natural gas engineering at West Virginia University and the founder and President of Intelligent Solutions. He earned BS, MS, and PhD degrees in petroleum engineering.
This presentation involves the critical evaluation of sand-control-screen selection, design, and performance. The proliferation of new screens and screen types has raised legitimate questions about how to select the proper sand-control screen or other device for a particular formation and type of completion.
William K. Ott is an independent petroleum consultant based in Houston and is founder of Well Completion Technology. He earned a BS degree in chemical engineering from the University of Missouri.
Construction of an innovation process, database, and measurements is essential to communicate progress to senior management and validate innovative efforts. A simple process and its execution are discussed using an example project. A method to involve producing-asset staff is also described.
Phiroze Patel is Innovation Director for earned BS and MS degrees in aeronautics and astronautics and a PhD degree in nuclear engineering.
GameChanger has been successfully enabling innovators and entrepreneurs in the Shell E&P technology centers to rapidly develop innovative ideas that are not a part of traditional incremental technology development. This presentation demonstrates how innovators throughout the Shell E&P business have transformed subsurface-technology capability since the start of GameChanger in 1996. Download (pdf)
Leo Roodhart is Manager Strategic Innovation in Shell GameChanger. He is an associate fellow of Templeton College, Oxford University. Roodhart earned an MS degree in chemistry and a PhD degree in mathematics and physics from the University of Amsterdam.
The evolution of drilling technologies in recent years has allowed operators to explore for gas and high-viscosity oil in reservoirs at shallow burial depth and ultra-deep water where reservoirs are usually formed by turbidites. This discussion includes well construction issues and presents new approaches for sand-control system selection for gas and heavy-oil exploitation, minimization of pressure drop, well segmentation, and selective control of water production.
Luis C.B. Bianco is a Senior Petroleum Engineer for Petrobras in the Well Engineering Technical Support Team at the Rio de Janeiro Business Unit in Brazil. A sand-control specialist with 20 years of experience, he has been involved in advanced completion techniques and well design for deepwater wells.
Technologies related to i-field, e-field, intelligent energy, or digital oilfields have the potential to boost ultimate recovery factors to well above 50 to 60%. This presentation examines evolving technologies and offers a roadmap for metamorphosis of asset managers and personnel resources. It will demonstrate ways to facilitate the education and training of a new generation of high-tech geoscientists.
Iraj Ershaghi is the Omar B. Milligan Professor and Director of Petroleum Engineering at the Viterbi School of Engineering at the U. of Southern California (USC). He also serves as Executive Director of CiSoft, a USC-Chevron Center of Excellence for Interactive Smart Oilfield Technologies. Ershagi earned a Bs with honors from the U. of Tehran and MS and PhD degrees in petroleum engineering from USC.
GTP Technologies, including the well-known gas-to-liquids process, finally emerge as options to efficiently convert this resource into clean, high-value fuels and chemicals. Less known are rapid advances in gas-to-chemicals (such as methanol) conversion technologies and increases in plant scales which significantly reduce manufacturing costs. There is great promise for dimethyl-ether among other derivatives. This lecture will address the role of GTP in the context of existing gas monetization businesses.
Theo Fleisch is a Distinguished Advisor for BP’s new Global Gas-To-Products Group. An expert in GTP, he earned MS and PhD degrees in physical chemistry from the U. of Innsbruck, Austria, and has worked for 27 years in technical and managerial roles for Amoco and BP.
This talk will address the background of MPD, provide recent case examples in which specific drilling-related barriers were overcome, and illustrate equipment layouts required to practice each variation of MPD from all types of rigs. The desire to reduce drilling nonproductive time and costs associated with lost circulation, narrow pressure windows, slow rate of penetration, and others are key incentives to practice MPD. The two categories of MPD, reactive and proactive, along with four variations will be presented and discussed.
Don Hannegan is a recognized expert in development of MPD technology and is a functional director for Weatherford Intl. He invented several offshore designs of rotating control devices and fit-for-purpose elastomers for rotating annulus seal elements. Hannegan is also the primary content provider for the MPD chapter in SPE’s new textbook-in-progress, Advanced Drilling Technology and Well Construction.
Increased sensitivity of senior oil company executives, board members, and investors centers around the requirements of reserves booking and reporting, including exploration potential and sub-commercial resources. Discussion will focus on the need for a reserves system that captures the total resource portfolio, the critical decision points within that system (focal points for corporate governance) and a process that provides quality control and an audit trail to ensure reporting requirements are met.
Anthony Harrison is Reserves Manager for Santos Ltd. He has spent more than 30 years in the oil and gas industry and has served in a number of technical and supervisory roles in the geoscience area and in reservoir engineering.
While even the most benign wellbore conditions can be challenging under the right circumstances, this talk will concentrate on those that are challenging to even the subject-matter experts, but also point out the issues that must be addressed and are often either overlooked, oversimplified, or not considered as significant to the task at hand.
James Heathman is a Global Technical Advisor for the Halliburton Fluids Div., specializing in cementing and conformance technology. He earned BS and MS degrees in petroleum engineering from Louisiana Tech U. and a MBA degree from Oklahoma State U.
This lecture presents development application of gas injection EOR technology to such viscous oil reservoirs where gas resource is available and the reservoir has a large development target with many high rate wells. Miscible gas EOR technology is rarely applied to viscous oil reservoirs. The presentation will show that for viscous oils, it is still possible to significantly increase oil recovery above waterflood by injecting the enriched gas in a WAG process, even if classical miscibility is not achieved.
Bharat Jhaveri is a Reservoir Engineering Advisor at BP Exploration with more than 24 years of experience that includes expertise in phase behavior and compositional modeling in addition to design, engineering, and evaluation of large-scale gas EOR projects. His work was instrumental in design of the Prudhoe Bay Miscible and Vaporization Projects. Jhaveri received a BS degree in chemical engineering from Indian Inst. of Technology Kanpur in India, an MS in chemical engineering from the Illinois Inst. of Technology Chicago, and a PhD degree in chemical engineering from Stanford U.
In addition to addressing well productivity issues and considering various completion options to modeling the coupled reservoir/wellbore/surface network system, this talk explores how uncertainties in volumetrics and capital-and-operating expenses may influence designing the total system to meet delivery targets. Several useful phenomenological correlations shed light on understanding various issues surrounding management of gas/condensate systems. It also introduces a simple screening tool to check whether cycling of lean gas is feasible.
C. Shah Kabir has more than 28 years in the oil industry, with the past 15 years at Chevron. His experiences include transient testing, wellbore fluid and heat flow modeling, and reservoir engineering. Kabir earned an MS degree in chemical engineering from the U. of Calgary.
The cost of unsuccessful first-time cementing operations, while thought to be huge, is rarely measured by operators because of a technical disconnect that can occur between drilling and production staff. This lecture details some of the generally agreed best practices for prevention of drilling nonproductive time related to setting cement plugs and fluid migration after cementing. Issues impacting long-term zonal isolation, minimum engineering design requirements, and balance between good drilling fluid performance- successful primary cementing will be presented.
Daryl S. Kellingray is a Drilling Specialist in the drilling technology unit of BP E&P Technology Group. He is BP’s Global Cementing Specialist. Kellingray’s career began in the BP Research Center in London in the area of gas migration/cement shrinkage and mixing energy effects on cement slurries. He later became involved in cementing operations in the U.K. sector of the North Sea.
Achieving a reduction in sulfur, accomplished by various upgrading processes, can have a profound impact in terms of crude price. Conversion of high-sulfur crude is becoming increasingly more attractive. This presentation offers an overview of crude quality issues and heavy-oil upgrading technologies to improve crude quality. Discussion will cover compelling and innovative options and examples of opportunities, some of which can possibly be applied within E&P, in improving crude quality while addressing traditional production issues.
Rashid Khan is an Intellectual Property Specialist and Energy Technologist for Saudi Aramco providing leadership to capture, develop, and commercialize intellectual properties upstream and downstream. Considered an international expert in hydrocarbon processing, he has served as a technical advisor to the U.S. White House. Khan earned an MS in energy and fuels engineering from Pennsylvania State U. and an MS in environmental engineering from Oregon State U. He also earned a PhD in energy and fuels engineering from Pennsylvania State U.
Upscaling describes the range of techniques used to develop the properties coarser, simpler models. Current best practice has moved away from “local” calculations to “extended-local” and “global” techniques that take advantage of the adjacent portions of the detailed reservoir description to develop more robust effective properties. Upgridding describes techniques used to design the spatial resolution of the coarser model. Examples from North America and the North Sea will be used to demonstrate the power of combining these approaches.
Michael J. King, a Senior Reservoir Engineer for BP, has shaped the company’s global reservoir modeling strategy as a technology network leader, technology advisor, and R&D project manager with expertise in heterogeneity modeling and upscaling of geologic models. He continues active research in modeling strategy. King earned a PhD from Syracuse U. with post-doctoral studies in nuclear and particle physics.
Innovative integrated reservoir modeling technology based on latest achievements in seismic processing, rock physics, integrated reservoir/facility modeling, and production optimization is presented. Significant business value has been added with the new technology applications for the optimization of infill drilling, waterflood, and facility modification programs that are supported by reservoir studies in the Gulf of Mexico, Alaska, and North Sea oil/gas fields.
Michael L. Litvak, a Reservoir Engineering Advisor for BP, has 34 years of petroleum industry experience. He has developed innovative technology for integrated reservoir/facility modeling and production optimization in the commercial reservoir simulator. Litvak earned MS degree in Petroleum Engineering from Moscow Oil and Gas University and PhD in Applied Mathematics from Academy Sciences of USSR.
Using knowledge of available cements and compressive strength enhancing agents, a new cement blend was developed that could get higher compressive strengths and better acoustical impedance in a shorter time frame while maintaining the cement density at 12 ppg and slurry-process economics. Examples of pre- and post-solution cement bond logs and economics related to non-productive time over a large drilling program will be presented.
David Mack is an Advanced Senior Production Engineer in the Reservoir and Well Performance Group with Marathon Oil. Having received a Petroleum Engineer.degree in petroleum engineering from the Colorado School of Mines, he has held various research and operational positions with pressure pumping companies in north Texas, the Rocky Mountains, Mid-Continent, and Appalachian Basin.
The recent maturing of 3D rotary steerable systems has generated renewed interest in understanding wellbore quality and its impact. The term wellbore quality is not particularly well defined, its context often misunderstood and is usually considered too complex to quantify. This talk will offer an overview of issues relating to wellbore quality, explain the issues in quantifying it, and discuss the implications of having a common industry definition.
Colin Mason, a Senior Drilling Engineering Specialist based in BP’s E&P Technology Group, began his career as an academic at the U. of Southampton and later became a network analyst for a major oil and gas distribution company and a pipeline design engineer for an international engineering consultancy. He joined BP’s Technology Center in 1997, providing engineering support to extended-reach drilling operations at Wytch Farm.
Batch drilling, in combination with high spread rates, dictates that well failures be kept to a minimum. This goal is reinforced by the extreme consequences of a hydrocarbon release at the mudline. The current presentation reviews the context, success, and developmental failures of a variety of recently introduced design advances, using specific well examples to reinforce key points.
Phillip D. Pattillo is a Distinguished Advisor with BP America in E&P technology. Since 1972, he has worked in the areas of multiphase flow and tubular and rock mechanics. Pattillo earned a BS degree in mechanical engineering and an MS degree in engineering science from Louisiana State U. and MS and PhD degrees in engineering science from the U. of Notre Dame.
Sand control is mandatory in most Campos Basin reservoirs. Since the first frac-pack job was performed in 1996, many challenges related to three areas have been overcome—best practices, unconsolidated high-permeability rock fracturing. And design and pumping questions posed due to ultra-high permeability. This presentation poses both answers and questions about frac-packs in soft rocks in deep water.
Carlos A. Pedroso, a Completion Engineer for Petrobras, is a technical advisor in sand control and stimulation. He earned a degree in chemical engineering and petroleum engineering from Federal U. of Paraná and an MS degree in petroleum engineering from Campinas U.
The most recent form of testing, formation testing while drilling (FTWD), introduces new capabilities to the drilling environment. While still in its infancy, FTWD enables new pressure transient analysis techniques to determine properties of interest to drilling, such as filtrate loss rate and depth of invasion. This talk highlights applications that have been developed, applied, and successfully demonstrated.
Mark A. Proett is a Senior Scientific Advisor for Halliburton Energy Services in the Strategic Research group. He received a BSME degree from the U. of Maryland and an MS degree from Johns Hopkins. Proett has published extensively in the area of well testing and fluid flow analysis methods.
Openhole completions have become a key component to efficient field development. Given the large number of fluid options to drill and complete these wells, careful testing and planning become paramount. Problems that can arise include invasion of solids, creation of scales or emulsions, plugging of completion assemblies, or incompatibilities of sequential fluid treatments.
Charles Svoboda, the Reservoir Drill-In Fluid Technical Manager at M-I SWACO, has 23 years of experience in drilling fluids, reservoir drilling fluid, and completions. He earned a BS in civil engineering from the U. of Illinois. Svoboda’s operational and technical positions have included Technical Manager for M-I SWACO’s European Technical Center in Stavanger.
Challenges and opportunities for Operating in Environmentally Sensitive Basins Learning from the California Experience
Smaller operators, who serve as stewards of resources in environmentally sensitive areas, have profited greatly from the benefits of advanced technologies in managing oilfields in sensitive environments. Using new technology from existing infrastructure combined with cooperative efforts between government agencies and operators, it has been demonstrated that successful development can be achieve with no or mitigateable environmental impact.
Marina Voskanian, Chief of Planning and Development with the California State Lands Commission, previously worked for Exxon, Southern California Gas Co., Aminoil, and Phillips Petroleum. She earned graduate degrees in petroleum engineering from the U. of Southern California.
Drilling with casing, an emerging technology for simultaneously drilling and casing a well, is gaining increasing acceptance in onshore applications where entire wells are drilled with casing and offshore applications where it is used to drill selected intervals. This talk reviews the current status and advantages/disadvantages in drilling more than 1,000 intervals ranging from shallow surface holes using 20-in. casing to greater than 15,000 ft with 3-½-in. casing.
Tommy M. Warren is Director of Casing Drilling Research and Engineering for Tesco. He spent 26 years with Amoco serving in operations and drilling research. Warren earned BS and MS degrees in mineral engineering from the U. of Alabama and was selected as a U. of Alabama Distinguished Engineering Fellow in 1994.