Oil-Producing Countries Have Options To Coexist With Climate Action, Says Baker Institute Expert

Credit: 123RF.com/Rice University.
Oil tanks at the Ras Tanura terminal in Saudi Arabia.

Oil-producing countries are adopting a variety of strategies to shield their industries from climate action, seeking not just to survive but to recast their businesses in ways that provide competitive advantages, according to a working paper by an expert in the Center for Energy Studies at Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy.

“Climate Strategy for Producer Countries: The Case of Saudi Arabia” was authored by Jim Krane, the Wallace S. Wilson Fellow for Energy Studies at the Baker Institute. Krane, whose research explores the geopolitical aspects of energy with a focus on the Middle East and the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countiers (OPEC), presented the draft on 2 August at the Gulf Research Meeting at the University of Cambridge in England.

Krane’s paper explores in particular a less-studied climate strategy: near-term actions that Saudi Arabia and other producer states have taken or may take in the next few years to maintain oil exports amid emerging restrictions on fossil fuels.

Like other large producers of carbon-intensive fossil fuels, Saudi Arabia finds itself at the center of the global climate conundrum, increasingly recognized as major fossil fuel producer, exporter, subsidizer, and consumer, Krane said. “Saudi Arabia also stands to become an early and significant victim of climate change, since its arid geography and harsh summer climate is highly vulnerable to damage,” Krane wrote.

“Some of the strategies that Saudi Arabia has developed would alter the nature of its future participation in the oil business,” Krane wrote. “From simply supplying energy commodities, the kingdom is increasing its involvement in importing markets and in sustaining oil-consuming technology.”

Krane’s paper divides the strategies into three forms:

  • Oil-funded governments will “dig in” to protect their oil and gas industries by making them more competitive than those of rival producers, particularly on the basis of greenhouse gas emissions. “Saudi Arabia has succeeded in reducing the carbon dioxide and methane emissions from its upstream oil sector and as a result, the carbon intensity of its crude oil is lower than almost all competing grades,” Krane said. As governments begin imposing carbon taxes, Saudi Arabia could actually benefit from a carbon tax that differentiates among grades of crude oil. Saudi Arabia is also investing heavily in “climate-proof” uses for oil and gas, such as petrochemical production, which converts oil and gas into plastics rather than burning it.
  • Governments also join in with global climate action, pursuing pledges to reduce greenhouse gases in line with the 2015 Paris agreement. These pledges give producer countries increased international environmental credibility while providing useful political cover for unpopular domestic actions such as Saudi Arabia’s reform of energy subsidies. Externally, however, producer governments prefer climate actions that protect demand for fossil fuels, supporting technologies like carbon capture and storage and reductions in natural gas flaring.
  • Producer governments are also lobbying for a go-slow approach to climate action, cautioning that fast-paced decarbonization is expensive and unrealistic. They argue that some damage from human-caused climate change would be preferable to drastic schemes to slash emissions.

Read the full story here.

Read the paper here (PDF).

 

 

HSE Now is a source for news and technical information affecting the health, safety, security, environment, and social responsibility discipline of the upstream oil and gas industry.