Intelligent Fields Technology
In the late 1990s, a friend in the office showed me a cobbled-together neural network in Excel that was driving (then Hyprotech, now Aspen) Hysys such that the calculation speeds were significantly faster than those in the more-rigorous but wandering solution that Hysys alone could yield. While interesting and a good solution for that problem, it seemed to me at the time something that a hobbyist would do in the evenings.
During the past few years, it has become painfully obvious that such a dismissive conclusion is outdated. Artificial-intelligence (AI) -based methods have become mainstream engineering, and we as practitioners need to have a firm understanding of the principles and be ready to apply them when the opportunities arise.
AI-related papers now make up a significant fraction of the overall literature in intelligent fields. For example, during the past year, Ikezue and Onukwuli have shown how neural networks can be used to control gas production in multilaterals. Baarimah et al. used a variety of techniques, including neural networks and fuzzy logic, to predict reservoir-fluid properties and demonstrated why this could be a better approach to a single correlation choice. Alzate et al. used neural networks to generate and test artificial well logs to assist in geomechanical evaluations. Note that these papers and others presented in the last year come not only from academic institutions but increasingly from operators and service providers reporting how these techniques are being used to make business decisions.
Why have these technologies gained traction? The answer, of course, is partly that the technologies have matured, though the basics have clearly been in place for some time. The more important trends are a vast increase in the availability of data and the increasing need to make business decisions before the physics of the problem is understood well enough to form a reasonable physical model. AI has emerged as a go-to solution type to help us build physical insight into problems where the complexity or heterogeneity of the problem makes a comprehensive physical model still too difficult to pose.
Among the articles featured in the section, you will find some enlightening examples that illustrate the utility of these approaches.
Recommended Additional Reading
OTC 25391 A Review of Intelligent-Completions Installations: Lessons Learned From Electric/Hydraulic, Hydraulic, and All-Electric Systems by Maciel Potiani, Baker Hughes, et al.
SPE 169388 Generating Synthetic Well Logs by Artificial Neural Networks Using MISO-ARMAX Model in Cupiagua Field by G.A. Alzate, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, et al.
SPE 170113 An Integrated Application of Cluster Analysis and Artificial Neural Networks for SAGD-Recovery-Performance Prediction in Heterogeneous Reservoirs by Amirian Ehsan, University of Alberta, et al.
Intelligent Fields Technology
John Hudson, SPE, Senior Production Engineer, Shell
01 May 2015
Enhancing Model Consistency in Ensemble-Based History Matching
The aim of this work is to present the effectiveness of a fully integrated approach for ensemble-based history matching on a complex real-field application.
First Three-Zone Intelligent Completion in Brazilian Presalt: Challenges and Lessons
Since the first intelligent completion was installed 20 years ago, the systems have become increasingly complex in order to reach productivity and optimization goals, allowing real-time independent monitoring and management of each zone in the well.
Rapid S-Curve Update Using Ensemble Variance Analysis With Model Validation
In the complete paper, the authors propose a novel method to rapidly update the prediction S-curves given early production data without performing additional simulations or model updates after the data come in.
Don't miss out on the latest technology delivered to your email weekly. Sign up for the JPT newsletter. If you are not logged in, you will receive a confirmation email that you will need to click on to confirm you want to receive the newsletter.
16 April 2018