ADVERTISEMENT

Modeling Reveals Hidden Conditions That Impair Wellbore Stability and Integrity

Fig. 1—Desired annulus pressure.

This paper describes thermal modeling and its combination with drilling-fluid analysis to reveal concealed changes in well conditions during various drilling and completion operations. These hidden conditions represent significant changes in the well’s drilling- and completion-fluid temperature, pressure, and density (FTPD) that may help explain wellbore-stability and -integrity issues.

Introduction

In the past, it has been difficult to make a case for temperature modeling. Temperature did not seem to be an issue in drilling, and production engineers could usually assume worst-case scenarios, such as constant bottomhole flowing temperature throughout the production tubing. Deepwater drilling and high-pressure/high-temperature wells have changed that attitude to a certain degree, and the effects of trapped annular pressure have become design issues for well completions. The effect of temperature on cementing has long been recognized, and it is understood that the correct determination of retarder can be critical. Otherwise, temperature modeling during drilling has not seemed to be that important. Typically, intermediate-string cementing is focused on achieving a good cement job and drilling ahead, and not on issues of temperature and pressure. One reason is the extensive use of water-based drilling muds. Water density is not particularly sensitive to pressure and temperature, so surface-measured mud weight usually does not vary much in conventional wells. Oil-based and synthetic-oil-based muds, on the other hand, are much more pressure- and temperature-sensitive. Furthermore, modern deepwater wells are encountering much more extreme temperature and pressure conditions, and maintaining the correct pressure has become more critical because of weak formations. The focus on thermally induced annular pressures has previously been a concern only for casing design, not for wellbore stability or well control. The purpose of this paper is to raise awareness of these issues and their consequences.

This article, written by JPT Technology Editor Chris Carpenter, contains highlights of paper SPE 163476, “Modeling Reveals Hidden Conditions That Can Impair Wellbore Stability and Integrity,” by Robert F. Mitchell, SPE, Halliburton; Ronald Sweatman,SPE, Consultant; and Gary Young, Encana, prepared for the 2013 SPE/IADC Drilling Conference and Exhibition, Amsterdam, 5–7 March. The paper has not been peer reviewed.
...
This article is reserved for SPE members and JPT subscribers.
If you would like to continue reading,
please Sign In, JOIN SPE or Subscribe to JPT

Modeling Reveals Hidden Conditions That Impair Wellbore Stability and Integrity

01 January 2015

Volume: 67 | Issue: 1

STAY CONNECTED

Don't miss out on the latest technology delivered to your email weekly.  Sign up for the JPT newsletter.  If you are not logged in, you will receive a confirmation email that you will need to click on to confirm you want to receive the newsletter.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT