History Matching and Forecasting

Throughout my career, I have witnessed some funny moments concerning reservoir modeling and history matching. Here, I will talk about two of them. The first one is an adaptation of something I read: “History matching is the process of torturing a model until it confesses.” Despite the obvious anecdotal nature, this sentence is actually an interesting analogy. Torture makes the victim say anything you want to hear, even if it is not the truth. Please, do not get me wrong. I am not suggesting that history matching is a despicable practice comparable with torture. The analogy is more subtle. What I mean is that there is a scrupulous limit for history matching; if it starts looking like you are “torturing” the model, then you went too far. Stop there and rethink the process. You are not going to get reliable information from this model anyway.

The second incident occurred in a workshop I attended last year. At some point, a geologist made a presentation about history matching a field problem. He started the talk with the message “History Matching: 30 Years of Failure.” At first, I found it somewhat funny, but at the same time a little troubling. During the coffee break, I overheard a colleague, probably upset with the talk, paraphrasing with “Geological Modeling: 30 Years of Failure.” The geologist was unhappy with history matching because, in his past experience, that was the excuse for the engineer to distort his model. The engineer, on the other hand, blames the geological models that are not able to reproduce the observed production. That brings me exactly to the point I want to make. History matching should not be seen as a sealed task. History matching is only one part of something more comprehensive—reservoir modeling, a process that involves several disciplines working together toward the same goal, answering questions about the reservoir to be able to make useful forecasts and aid decision making.

Last year, we had a nice collection of papers presented at SPE conferences about history matching and forecasting. There are three points I will mention. First, there is a clear trend in the field applications of moving away from history matching a single model and adopting forecasts on the basis of multiple realizations. Second, there are some interesting papers on integrated reservoir studies. I selected one for the additional-­reading list. Finally, I noticed a significant number of interesting papers on proxy and data-driven models for production forecast. I am not sure that this is a current trend, but I selected two papers for this month’s feature. (One is summarized in the main selection, and the other is in the additional-reading list.) Of course, you can find many other interesting papers at onepetro.org. I hope you enjoy the reading.

This Month's Technical Papers

A Data-Driven Model for History Matching and Prediction

Streamline-Based History Matching for Multicomponent Compositional Systems

Bayesian-Style History Matching: Another Way To Underestimate Forecast Uncertainty?

Recommended Additional Reading

SPE 172594 Integration of Reservoir-Performance and Geoscience Studies in the History Match of a Complex Carbonate Reservoir—A Case Study From the Magwa Marrat Reservoir, Kuwait by Menayer Al Jadi, Kuwait Oil Company, et al.

SPE 173206 Physics-Based and Data-Driven Surrogates for Production Forecasting by Hector Klie, ConocoPhillips

SPE 174310 Seismic Assisted History Matching Using Binary Image Matching by Dennis Obidegwu, Heriot-Watt University, et al.

Alexandre Emerick, SPE, is a reservoir engineer at Petrobras Research Center in Rio de Janeiro. He has 13 years of experience in applied research in reservoir engineering. Emerick’s research interests include reservoir simulation, history matching, uncertainty quantification, and optimization. At Petrobras, he has worked as principal researcher and coordinator of projects on time-lapse seismic, smart fields, optimal well placement, history matching, and closed-loop reservoir management. Emerick holds BS and MS degrees in civil engineering from the University of Brasilia, Brazil, and a PhD degree in petroleum engineering from The University of Tulsa. He is the author or coauthor of 22 technical papers, most about history matching. Emerick received the Outstanding Service Award as an SPE Journal technical editor in 2013 and 2014. He is a member of the JPT Editorial Committee and can be reached at emerick@petrobras.com.br.

History Matching and Forecasting

Alexandre Emerick, SPE, Reservoir Engineer, Petrobras Research Center

01 April 2016

Volume: 68 | Issue: 4


Don't miss out on the latest technology delivered to your email weekly.  Sign up for the JPT newsletter.  If you are not logged in, you will receive a confirmation email that you will need to click on to confirm you want to receive the newsletter.