A Vendor’s View on Cost Control in Megaprojects
The factors contributing to out-of-control costs and delayed deliveries of projects are many. They range from unrealistic early cost and time estimates and human factors to the effects of geopolitical events. As with most complex subjects, the reasons lie in the eye of the beholder—and the context from which the beholder draws conclusions.
At the recent Offshore Northern Seas 2014 conference in Stavanger, Linn Cecilie Moholt, chief executive officer of Karsten Moholt, offered a Tier 3 vendor’s view of cost drivers. The company provides engineering, installation, monitoring, and maintenance of electromechanical components to clients in energy, offshore, shipping, and subsea businesses.
Moholt said the Norwegian oil and gas industry’s competitiveness is reduced because of the region’s high salaries and low efficiencies. Examples of projects for which construction was contracted abroad to reduce costs include Det Norske’s Ivar Aasen (SMOE, a subsidiary of Sembcorp Marine, in Singapore) and Statoil’s Mariner (Daewoo Shipbuilding and Marine Engineering in South Korea), Aasta Hansteen (Hyundai Heavy Industries in South Korea), and Dagny (Daewoo).
Norway’s provision of education to its youth has led to a higher number of professionals than historically seen, Moholt said. Although it is positive overall, the change has shifted the makeup and the competence balance of the organization of the supply chain, has driven costs upward, and contributed to a lack of differentiation between theoretical and practical knowledge.
She emphasized that not all workers need to be professional engineers or academicians. “Value the people that work hands on with technology as much as the educated engineer,” Moholt said. The value of hands-on craftsmen, more common in the past, was their direct familiarity with parts and systems and the know-how to troubleshoot problems with equipment.
Moholt presented data from a Statoil report, which showed the increase in accumulated man-hours of work for two comparable operation, maintenance, and monitoring projects. There was a 70% increase in the number of man-hours used for as-build engineering and a 304% increase in man-hours related to life cycle information and as-build updates. Man-hours related to total cable lengths (in meters) increased by 37%, while passive fire protection (in square meters) increased by 68%. Moholt pointed out that the largest increases were in the engineering-related activities.
She suggested that operators improve their communication with Tier 3 suppliers at the beginning of a project and rely on their knowledge and expertise. By involving the suppliers early in a project, the differentiation between theoretical and practical knowledge may become more apparent.
Moholt also emphasized the need to distinguish between innovation and modification. “There is a perception in the industry that modification equals innovation,” she said. “However, simply changing a way of connecting something is not an innovation.” Such practices prevent standardization of basic components, she said.
Adhering to a standardized modern maintenance philosophy can also help control life cycle costs. Often, a mixed approach of systematic preventive, reliability centered, or predictive maintenance is applied over time and results in inconsistent repairs/modifications or failure.
Moholt encourages the repair of parts, when possible, instead of replacement. The industry tends to replace parts because of the perception that “the parts are no longer available.” However, with today’s reverse engineering capabilities, it is possible to make “obsolete” parts, she said.
BP Approves Thunder Horse South Expansion Phase 2
The deepwater Gulf of Mexico project is expected to add 50,000 B/D of oil production through the construction of two new subsea production units and production wells.
Lessons Learned From the Big Foot Mooring Incident
After suffering major setbacks, Chevron’s massive Big Foot project finally achieved first oil last November in the US Gulf of Mexico. With the setbacks in the rear-view mirror, project personnel spoke about the challenges.
How To Design an Unmanned Minimal Floating Platform
Unmanned minimum facility platforms are a reliable alternative to traditional wellhead platforms or subsea installations, and the technologies enabling simpler designs have evolved.
Don't miss out on the latest technology delivered to your email every two weeks. Sign up for the OGF newsletter. If you are not logged in, you will receive a confirmation email that you will need to click on to confirm you want to receive the newsletter.
15 May 2019
14 May 2019