An Evaluation of Risk of Hydrate Formation at the Top of a Pipeline
Water condensation and/or hydrate formation at the top of pipelines are serious design/operation considerations in pipelines with stratified flow. Water condensation could result in top-of-the-line corrosion, particularly in sour-gas systems. Hydrate formation is believed to be another serious risk if the inhibitor in the aqueous phase cannot protect against hydrate formation at the top of the pipeline.
In this paper, we report the results of some preliminary tests conducted in a new experimental setup constructed for investigating gas-hydrate risks in various operational scenarios (e.g., top of pipelines, deadlegs/jumpers, startups, shutdowns). The reported three series of tests conducted in the new experimental setup address hydrate-formation risks at the top of pipelines or deadlegs caused by temperature gradient, and the risk of hydrate formation in the gas phase in the presence of kinetic hydrate inhibitors (KHIs) during pipeline cool down and startup. The results provide a better evaluation of the risks involved in various systems and provide guidelines for avoiding the associated problems.
Gas-hydrate management is considered to be the most critical aspect of flow-assurance-design strategies because hydrate plugs can have major safety and economic impacts on flowline operation and can stop production completely for several days or months, and in the worst case, can result in pipeline abandonment. Hydrate-plug dissociation and remediation can be a costly and time-consuming process and can result in restrictions on system operations. The issues of hydrate prevention and (if needed) remediation are therefore very important. Current methods for avoiding gas-hydrate problems are generally based on one or a combination of the following three techniques: (1) injection of thermodynamic inhibitors (e.g., methanol, ethanol, monoethylene glycol) to prevent hydrate formation, (2) use of KHIs to sufficiently delay hydrate nucleation/growth, and (3) maintaining pipeline operating conditions outside the hydrate-stability zone (HSZ) by removing one of the elements required for hydrate formation. Currently, the most common hydrate-flow-assurance strategy is to rely on the injection of organic inhibitors (e.g., methanol, monoethylene glycol) or KHIs to inhibit hydrate formation in gas production and transportation. The current industry practice for hydrate prevention by chemical methods is to inject hydrate inhibitors at the upstream end of pipelines on the basis of the calculated/measured hydrate-phase boundary, water cut, worst-case pressure and temperature conditions, and the possible inhibitor loss to nonaqueous phases.
JIP Aims for Life Extension Road Map for Top Tension Risers
A newly launched JIP aims to bridge the BSEE and API frameworks and achieve industry consensus on the analysis and inspection data required to assess the feasibility of an extended service life.
DCN Diving Nets Dana Petroleum Deal
DCN will execute fabrication, installation, and precommissioning of various components for a gas export pipeline from two platforms in the Dutch North Sea.
Facilities Piping Inspection: Is Direct Assessment Enough?
Tons of resources are devoted to assure the integrity of facility piping systems, but are the generally accepted methods of inspecting these systems the best way? Complex systems with above- and underground piping sections may require a combination of direct assessment and elements of an API code.
Don't miss out on the latest technology delivered to your email every two weeks. Sign up for the OGF newsletter. If you are not logged in, you will receive a confirmation email that you will need to click on to confirm you want to receive the newsletter.
11 February 2019
30 January 2019
04 February 2019
28 January 2019