An Evaluation of Risk of Hydrate Formation at the Top of a Pipeline
Water condensation and/or hydrate formation at the top of pipelines are serious design/operation considerations in pipelines with stratified flow. Water condensation could result in top-of-the-line corrosion, particularly in sour-gas systems. Hydrate formation is believed to be another serious risk if the inhibitor in the aqueous phase cannot protect against hydrate formation at the top of the pipeline.
In this paper, we report the results of some preliminary tests conducted in a new experimental setup constructed for investigating gas-hydrate risks in various operational scenarios (e.g., top of pipelines, deadlegs/jumpers, startups, shutdowns). The reported three series of tests conducted in the new experimental setup address hydrate-formation risks at the top of pipelines or deadlegs caused by temperature gradient, and the risk of hydrate formation in the gas phase in the presence of kinetic hydrate inhibitors (KHIs) during pipeline cool down and startup. The results provide a better evaluation of the risks involved in various systems and provide guidelines for avoiding the associated problems.
Gas-hydrate management is considered to be the most critical aspect of flow-assurance-design strategies because hydrate plugs can have major safety and economic impacts on flowline operation and can stop production completely for several days or months, and in the worst case, can result in pipeline abandonment. Hydrate-plug dissociation and remediation can be a costly and time-consuming process and can result in restrictions on system operations. The issues of hydrate prevention and (if needed) remediation are therefore very important. Current methods for avoiding gas-hydrate problems are generally based on one or a combination of the following three techniques: (1) injection of thermodynamic inhibitors (e.g., methanol, ethanol, monoethylene glycol) to prevent hydrate formation, (2) use of KHIs to sufficiently delay hydrate nucleation/growth, and (3) maintaining pipeline operating conditions outside the hydrate-stability zone (HSZ) by removing one of the elements required for hydrate formation. Currently, the most common hydrate-flow-assurance strategy is to rely on the injection of organic inhibitors (e.g., methanol, monoethylene glycol) or KHIs to inhibit hydrate formation in gas production and transportation. The current industry practice for hydrate prevention by chemical methods is to inject hydrate inhibitors at the upstream end of pipelines on the basis of the calculated/measured hydrate-phase boundary, water cut, worst-case pressure and temperature conditions, and the possible inhibitor loss to nonaqueous phases.
Private Equity Fund To Acquire BHGE’s Reciprocating Compression Division
The reciprocating compression division manufactures and services compression and engine systems that are used in a variety of applications, including the transmission of natural gas across domestic and international pipelines.
Water Outside the Permian: How Are Other Basins Handling the Volumes?
The Permian gets the lion’s share of attention when it comes to produced water, but other basins have a need to haul volumes off-site. How has the market changed in these areas recently? Is there a greater enthusiasm for pipelines, and can water midstream thrive?
New Pipelines Needed to Meet Surge in Permian Crude Demand
Growing supply of Permian crude oil means the basin will need extra takeaway capacity of up to 500,000 B/D by the end of the 2020s, according to new research from Wood Mackenzie.
Don't miss out on the latest technology delivered to your email every two weeks. Sign up for the OGF newsletter. If you are not logged in, you will receive a confirmation email that you will need to click on to confirm you want to receive the newsletter.
16 July 2019
10 July 2019
10 July 2019