Decommissioning – Challenge Accepted
Decommissioning – it’s now a word well entrenched in the mindset and indeed the operations of those involved in the North Sea oil and gas industry. With approximately $102 billion of decommissioning-related expenditure forecast to 2040 in Western Europe, it represents a significant opportunity for a supply chain which has proven itself willing to adapt to the increasingly challenging physical and commercial environment in the mature North Sea basin.
The nature of decommissioning presents a very different dynamic to the field development of the E&P sector where the asset- or field-owner’s strategy is to minimize the ultimate costs/liability involved in removing infrastructure safely and in accordance with appropriate regulations. Meanwhile, the supply chain stands to benefit from meaningful revenue streams and is gearing up accordingly. However, in a volatile and weakened commodity price environment, the key challenge is for the supply chain to present efficient, cost-effective solutions to the E&P operators, while still being able to achieve reasonable profitability.
In Western Europe, there are currently about 5,600 surface wells and a further 2,600 subsea wells which all require plug and abandonment (P&A) as part of the decommissioning process – current methods for this typically require the use of a cement plug delivered from a dedicated rig. As the volume of P&A activity gathers pace, many believe the traditional methods present opportunities for innovation such as the use of alternative barriers to cement or chemical barriers which isolate the reservoir itself as opposed to at the wellbore. If these technologies can be delivered without the use of a dedicated rig, clear time and cost savings will be achieved for the asset owners.
|"...[T]here exists a real need for innovative approaches to offshore dismantlement delivering increasing amounts of small- or medium-sized pieces to onshore facilities."|
Public bodies and corporates are also assessing how removal of structures (both offshore and the processing onshore) can be best addressed in a cost-efficient manner. Westwood estimates a total of 4.3 million tons of infrastructure will be removed through to 2040 in Western Europe. This infrastructure has to be taken onshore to be processed and it is perhaps not realistic to do all this using reverse installation techniques and heavy- or single-lift vessels, so there exists a real need for innovative approaches to offshore dismantlement delivering increasing amounts of small- or medium-sized pieces to onshore facilities. The local ports (e.g., Scottish and English) should develop new strategies to break down and recycle (where possible) the tonnage in a cost-efficient manner, thereby making themselves more competitive to ports in other jurisdictions when decommissioning contracts are awarded in the North Sea. We have already seen Forth Ports and Lerwick Port Authority enter into joint ventures with Tier 1 contractors to deliver strategies in this regard. We expect to see further Tier 1s emerge as decommissioning specialists and align themselves with existing facilities across the UK. This will come on the back of planned investment into increased water depths, strengthened quay sides, and suitable hazardous waste management facilities at several UK ports with a focus on becoming decommissioning-ready.
It is, however, not just those in the field who must adapt to a market which is expected to drive meaningful levels of activity in the North Sea, if commodity prices continue to be weak. Banks, investors, accountants, and the legal community all need to best understand how to advise their clients through the challenges decommissioning presents. The oil and gas industry could not exist without the provision of capital and professional services from these communities. It is therefore crucial for all stakeholders to embrace decommissioning with an innovative approach in order to optimize the commercial outcomes.
Ian McDonald can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org
Regulatory Push Grows for Decommissioning of Subsea Equipment
The shutting in of unprofitable offshore wells and the requirements for their plugging and abandonment is attracting more attention to what is being done with the associated subsea equipment. The benefits of leaving subsea systems in place vs. recovering them are being considered.
Stay or Go: Is In-Situ Decommissioning the Way To Go?
Decommissioning experts in the UK examine the advantages and disadvantages of removing offshore installations vs. leaving them in place, discussing cost efficiencies, environmental factors, and long-term risks.
Collaborative Tool Helps Companies Plan Decommissioning, Share Lessons Learned
Decom North Sea has developed the Late Life Planning Portal system, a web-based information portal, to capture tools that add value as well as good practices and lessons learned from the execution of decommissioning projects.
26 January 2018
12 February 2018
25 January 2018
30 January 2018