The SPE Asia Pacific Unconventional Resources Conference and Exhibition held in Brisbane last November featured a special session, “Megaprojects: Past, Present, and Future,” that focused on some of the key issues facing megaprojects in the Asia Pacific region. Panel speakers discussed the main impediments to megaprojects, resource acquisition and management, and the project management skills and business climate in the region.
Another topic the speakers addressed was the role of uncertainty and risk in sanctioning megaprojects. In an environment where more than half of all projects are facing cost overruns, schedule delays, or both, the need to recognize problem areas prior to sanction is as great as ever (Ernst and Young 2014).
One way to improve decision making for megaprojects is to understand, quantify, and mitigate risk and uncertainty. To do that, exploration and production companies are spending money to gather and analyze the necessary data.
Steve Begg, a professor of petroleum engineering and management at the University of Adelaide and a panelist at the megaproject special session, said a company that is biased toward risk aversion or risk-seeking behaviors faces a worse long-term outcome than companies that take a risk-neutral, or an expected-value, approach to decision making.
“If you’ve got large degrees of uncertainty but you’re unbiased, then one project might fail but another one might be brilliant, and if you look at a collection of decision outcomes in a corporation, you’ll be well ahead. So uncertainty isn’t the problem. It’s bias,” he said....
Understanding Uncertainty and Risk in Capital Projects
28 January 2016