Acidizing/stimulation

Use of Weak-Acid and Nonacid Alternatives in Acidizing Horizontal Wells

An operator developing tight carbonate reservoirs found that conventional acid stimulation with 15% hydrochloric acid (HCl) in horizontal wells did not provide expected results.

jpt-2015-06-weakacidfig1.jpg
Fig. 1—Comparison of acidization results, with the envelopes for different formulations in Field A.

An operator developing tight carbonate reservoirs found that conventional acid stimulation with 15% hydrochloric acid (HCl) in horizontal wells did not provide expected results. A subsequent study revealed that permeability and length of treatment are the main parameters in deciding the optimal stimulation chemical. A correlation was developed, on the basis of the kinetic parameters of various chemicals and field experience, that can act as a guide in selecting the proper acidization formulations.

Introduction

In vertical wells, positive skin pertains to reduction of effective wellbore radius, thus sacrificing reservoir contact. It is very important to note that, in long horizontal wells, wellbore radius does not represent the reservoir contact; rather, it is replaced by the horizontal length.

×
SPE_logo_CMYK_trans_sm.png
Continue Reading with SPE Membership
SPE Members: Please sign in at the top of the page for access to this member-exclusive content. If you are not a member and you find JPT content valuable, we encourage you to become a part of the SPE member community to gain full access.