EOR Performance and Modeling
Efforts for increasing recovery factors in all reservoir types continued with increasing momentum during the past year. Maturing fields combined with limited exploration forced operators to focus on recovering more from existing fields. Implementing enhanced oil recovery (EOR) in a depressed-oil-price environment is accepted as a challenge by our resilient industry, and, therefore, all aspects of EOR, including EOR agents, EOR physics, and EOR modeling and monitoring, improved further.
We saw progress in all EOR schemes in the past year, from expanding-solvent steam-assisted gravity drainage (SAGD) to increasing recovery factors in unconventional fields in the US. While carbon-dioxide EOR continues to be used in conventional reservoirs, it is also becoming a desired EOR agent for unconventionals. EOR implementations in high-viscosity-oil reservoirs continued to see improvements with more chemistry, with heat, with improved reservoir characterization, and with advancements in SAGD implementation.
Progress in chemical EOR, from polymer to alkaline/surfactant/polymer, has been significant. Not only are there new chemicals with improved recovery capabilities, but also the cost of the chemicals is being reduced continuously. All those factors led to more operators using chemical EOR. It is worth reiterating that increasing recovery factors in unconventionals will remain the top priority for many years to come. The next chapter of the exciting unconventionals journey will be more about EOR.
EOR momentum on all fronts is reflected in the technical papers reviewed this year. This is the first time I have seen that all EOR schemes were covered. Half the technical papers were about fundamentals, and the other half were about field implementation. I found that to be the best indicator that EOR is becoming an integral part of managing oil fields. The selected papers provide a summary of some of the noteworthy advancements in EOR performance and modeling.
This Month's Technical Papers
Recommended Additional Reading
SPE 187032 Nanoscale-Flow-Chip Platform for Laboratory Evaluation of Enhanced-Oil-Recovery Materials by Michael Engel, IBM Research, et al.
SPE 185526 Surveillance and Initial Results of an Existing Polymer Flood: A Case History From the Rayoso Formation by L.A. Martino, YPF, et al.
SPE 183165 Borehole Controlled-Source Electromagnetics for Hydrocarbon-Saturation Monitoring in the Bockstedt Oil Field, Onshore Northwest Germany by K. Tietze, GFZ Potsdam, et al.
SPE 182669 Uncertainty Quantification for Foam Flooding in Fractured Carbonate Reservoirs by A. Almaqbali, Heriot-Watt University, et al.
SPE 185002 ES-SAGD Relative Permeability as a Function of Temperature and Solvent Concentrations by M. Zeidani, University of Calgary, et al.
EOR Performance and Modeling
Omer Gurpinar, SPE, Technical Director of Enhanced Oil Recovery, Schlumberger
01 January 2018
In my previous features, I discussed the challenges facing carbon dioxide (CO2), both technical and economic. By far the biggest use of CO2 is in enhanced oil recovery (EOR). In this feature, the focus is on overcoming the biggest challenges facing CO2 EOR—gravity override and mobility.
CO2-Foam Field Pilot Test in a Sandstone Reservoir
This paper presents an analysis of a CO2-foam-injection pilot in the Salt Creek Field, Natrona County, Wyoming.
Integrated CO2-Foam Pilot in a Heterogeneous Carbonate Field
A carbon-dioxide (CO2) -foam enhanced-oil-recovery (EOR) pilot research program has been initiated to advance the technology of CO2 foam for mobility control in a heterogeneous carbonate reservoir.
Don't miss out on the latest technology delivered to your email weekly. Sign up for the JPT newsletter. If you are not logged in, you will receive a confirmation email that you will need to click on to confirm you want to receive the newsletter.
17 July 2018
12 July 2018
09 July 2018
18 July 2018