WY DEQ: Hydraulic Fracturing Not Likely Culprit of Water Contamination
In a recently released report, the Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality (WDEQ) concluded that hydraulic fracturing operations were not the likely cause of well water contamination in a small town near Shoshone National Forest.
The WDEQ report follows a 2011 draft report from the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) investigating complaints from domestic well owners in the area surrounding Pavillion, a town located approximately 80 miles southeast of Shoshone, of objectionable taste and smells in groundwater. The EPA report suggested that hydraulic fracturing fluids had a possible impact on groundwater in the area but failed to come to a definitive conclusion.
Domestic wells in the area of investigation overlie the Pavillion gas field, which consists of 169 production wells that extract gas from the lower Wind River Formation and the underlying Fort Union Formation. In its report, the EPA said that hydraulic fracturing in gas production wells occurred at depths as shallow as 372 m below ground, while domestic and stock wells in the area were screened at depths as far as 244 m below ground.
Unlike other gas fields recently associated with hydraulic fracturing, gas in the Pavillion field is sourced from permeable sand reservoirs using standard vertical wells, not from the less permeable shale using horizontal wells. The WDEQ report said it was unlikely that fracturing fluids rose to the shallower depths where water supply wells would be present, and that the likelihood of well stimulation treatments forcing fluid interaction with shallow groundwater is negligible.
Based on field investigations conducted from 2009 to 2011, the EPA found the presence of diesel-related organics (DRO) and gasoline-related organics (GRO) in 23 of 28 water samples, which correlated with the foul odors associated with some domestic wells. Methane was detected in 10 of the 28 samples at concentration levels below 0.8 mg/L, and glycols were detected in domestic water wells. The agency said this contamination underscored potential future risk, but the agency said the existing data did not establish a definitive link between deep and shallow contamination of the aquifer and that further investigation was necessary.
In June 2013, the EPA announced that it would not finalize its draft report. Subsequently, the Wyoming state government announced it would perform a separate investigation of drinking water in the area. As part of the state’s investigation, 13 domestic water wells were evaluated for water quality and palatability concerns.
The WDEQ report found that the characteristics of groundwater in the water supply wells it studied were consistent with groundwater quality of the Wind River formation, but that concentrations of sodium, sulfate, and total dissolved solids exceeded drinking water standards in most water supply wells in the area.
The agency said that a lack of baseline water quality data predating the development of the Pavillion field prevented it from making a firm conclusion on the cause of the water quality issue, but the report speculated on a number of potential sources of contamination. Surface spills from fueling vehicles and releases from gas well pits may have led to the presence of petroleum constituents like isopropyl benzene and naphthalene. The DRO and GRO concentrations may have come from naturally occurring compounds, or they could have been the byproducts of bacterial growth.
The report found that the seepage along gas wells may have contributed to groundwater contamination, but the extent to which it did so is undefined and difficult to quantify. The WDEQ recommended, among other things, that further testing be performed to assess the potential for gas seepage along gas wells and if present conditions could allow for the movement of liquid or gas into shallower permeable zones. The agency also recommended further evaluation to determine whether surface pits contribute to water quality issues in water supply wells.
“From the beginning I have believed that it was in everyone’s best interest—particularly for those citizens concerned about their water—that Wyoming and the EPA reach an unbiased and scientifically supportable conclusion,” Wyoming governor Matt Mead said in a press release announcing the report’s findings. “I commend the work of the Wyoming Oil and Gas Conservation Commission, the Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality, and the experts they engaged for the thoughtful and productive manner with which they conducted their investigations.”
Water Outside the Permian: How Are Other Basins Handling the Volumes?
The Permian gets the lion’s share of attention when it comes to produced water, but other basins have a need to haul volumes off-site. How has the market changed in these areas recently? Is there a greater enthusiasm for pipelines, and can water midstream thrive?
Integration, Collaboration Drive Water Midstream Growth in Permian
As Permian production ramps up and saltwater disposal well capacity is pushed to its limit, companies see a need to develop collaborative, commercially viable methods of handling produced-water volumes. If reuse remains at its current rate of only 15%, operators could face a $30-billion tab.
The Opportunity and Threat Posed by US Shale Water
The well count and completion intensity of US tight oil and gas operations have grown in recent years, and rising pressure from environmental regulations means that produced water management has become a key focus for operators.
Don't miss out on the latest technology delivered to your email every two weeks. Sign up for the OGF newsletter. If you are not logged in, you will receive a confirmation email that you will need to click on to confirm you want to receive the newsletter.
16 July 2019
18 July 2019
15 July 2019