Publication Policies

 

Copyright Policies

We require transfer of copyright for all our publications, including conference proceedings. This allows us to distribute publications throughout the world by print and electronic means, to create translations and reuse them in reprint collections.

Transfer of Copyright+
Copyright During Peer-Review+

Plagiarism Policies

We expect authors to credit all sources used in their writings and not to represent work of others as their own. Authors found to have plagiarized the work of another are subject to having their paper removed from the conference program and from OnePetro. Future submissions from authors found to have plagiarized will be scrutinized carefully. In the case of students found to be plagiarizing the work of others, SPE may inform the student’s university.

For more information, check out the Plagiarism FAQ page »

How to Avoid Plagiarism+
Plagiarizing Your Own Work+
Help with the English Language+

Permissions Policies

Copyright allows us to perform a valuable service for our industry. SPE copyrights save you from needing to locate the authors to request permission; SPE can provide permission. To defray our costs, fees apply to certain types of use, especially those that are commercial in nature. SPE uses Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink licensing solution for reuse permissions. This allows you to immediately determine the fees and to complete the transaction online.

For more information, check out the Permissions FAQ page »

Conference Authors+
Distributing Printed Copies+
Distributing Electronic Copies+
Tables and Figures from our Publications+
General Permissions+

Conference Paper Policies

No Paper, No Podium Policy+
No Presentation Policy+
Conference Dual Submission Policy+
Manuscript Processing Procedures+
Correction Policy+

Appeals Process for Declined Peer-Reviewed Papers

The author has 90 days from the date of the decline letter to file an appeal. The author should send a letter to peer@spe.org outlining in detail why the paper merits publication and responding in detail to any reviewer comments provided in the decline letter. The Executive Editor will review the appeal to determine whether the author’s rebuttal is compelling and to be assured that the reviewers acted impartially in their review. If the EE believes that the appeal is without merit and that the decline decision should stand, then the decline recommendation, along with the paper’s original review details, will be forwarded to the Editor-in-Chief for a final decision.