Publication Policies
AI-generated Content in Publications
The proliferation and continually increasing sophistication of AI-assisted language tools and large language models (LLMs, such as ChatGPT, Deepseek, etc.) have opened new avenues for research as well as technical writing assistance, but the ethics and best practices for their use continue to evolve. These tools may generate useful information and content but are also prone to errors and inconsistencies. Furthermore, while AI can be very useful to assist in editing toward a clearer paper, particularly for non-English native speakers, it cannot replace the actual research and content creation.
To this end, AI-generated content can be used within SPE publications under the following conditions:
- AI language tools may not be listed as an author. The AI tool cannot sign publishing agreements or transfers of copyright.
- If AI language tools are used within a paper proposal submission, their use should be clearly noted at the end of the abstract as to how the tool was used, i.e. English clarification or grammar, literature review aid, etc.
- Any AI-generated content that is used within a manuscript should be thoroughly vetted, fact-checked, and disclosed with published references by the authors. All authors listed on a manuscript are equally responsible for this content quality and authenticity.
- If AI language tools are used within a manuscript, their use should be clearly explained within the methodology or acknowledgment section of the paper. This includes their use in assisting with the writing or proofing of the manuscript. If AI-generated content is included within a manuscript without an explanation, this can be grounds for rejection of the work at the discretion of SPE and may result in a code of conduct review.
- The authors of the manuscript or paper proposal will be held responsible for any errors, inconsistencies, incorrect references, plagiarism, or misleading content included in the AI tool.
Use of SPE-Copyrighted Content
Any use of SPE-copyrighted publications or other content in training sets or other forms of data ingestion by public, commercial, or institutional AI-assisted language tools or LLMs without permission from SPE is strictly prohibited.
Policy Review
This policy will be reviewed periodically to ensure that it remains relevant and effective in the face of changing technologies and emerging concerns. Changes to the policy will be communicated in a timely and transparent manner.
Copyright
We require transfer of copyright for all our publications, including conference proceedings. This allows us to distribute publications throughout the world by print and electronic means, to create translations and reuse them in reprint collections.
Transfer of Copyright
- No paper can be presented at an SPE conference unless a signed copy transferring copyright is received by SPE before the manuscript due date.
- If you are employed and prepared this paper within the scope of your employment, the original copyright to the paper belongs to your employer.
- If you sign the form, we assume you are authorized to do so by your employer and that your employer has consented to the transfer of copyright, to the representation and warranty of publication rights, and to all other terms and conditions of the form.
- If such authorization and consent has not been given you, an authorized representative of your employer should sign this form in the space provided for the Author.
- Always use the form provided in the author kit for the conference as wording may vary for some jointly sponsored meetings.
- No modifications or substitutions will be accepted and we do not accept a license to distribute in place of full transfer of copyright.
Author-retained Rights
Transfer of copyright does not affect the underlying intellectual property or concepts, which remain with the author or the employer. Authors and their employers retain certain rights for reuse of the material.
Downloads
- We require that authors provide a temporary transfer of copyright to facilitate the peer review process.
- If the paper is accepted for publication, a permanent transfer of copyright will be required.
- The author must agree not to submit the paper for review or publication elsewhere while under review by SPE.
- If the paper is not accepted for publication, full copyright will revert to the original owner, for papers that did not originate at an SPE conference.
Plagiarism
We expect authors to credit all sources used in their writings and not to represent work of others as their own. Authors found to have plagiarized the work of another are subject to having their paper removed from the conference program and from OnePetro. Future submissions from authors found to have plagiarized will be scrutinized carefully. In the case of students found to be plagiarizing the work of others, SPE may inform the student’s university.
For more information, check out the Plagiarism FAQ page.
- You can avoid plagiarizing others by using appropriate citation.
- Direct quotes should be indicated as such with the use of quotation marks, or for somewhat longer passages, indented as a block quote. However, in an original paper, direct quotation should be minimized.
- It is accepted practice that authors learn from and build on the work of others in their own work, but you should always use your own words to show that you understood the ideas.
Just because you are the author doesn’t mean that you can repeat long sections of your prior work in a new work. If you are writing a new paper, the content should be new, not a repeat of what you wrote in a prior paper.
No one will be concerned about the verbatim reuse of a few sentences or even a full paragraph, but you should not repeat full sections of a prior work. Just as you would summarize and cite the work of another author, you should summarize and cite your own prior work, then focus on what is new that led you to write the current paper.
Permissions
SPE uses Copyright Clearance Center’s licensing solution (Rightslink) for reuse permissions. This allows you to immediately determine the fees and to complete the transaction online. In most instances, the easiest way to request permission is to find the work in OnePetro and select the “Get Permission” link.
If you presented a paper at an SPE conference, you may request a one-time return of rights to publish your paper in a non-SPE magazine or journal.
- Requesting return of rights means that you are forfeiting the right to have your paper reviewed and considered for publication in SPE Journal. If your paper has been submitted for peer review, it will be withdrawn.
- If you are not the lead (or corresponding) author for the paper, SPE may ask for evidence that the other authors are aware of this publication request, because their rights to review by SPE Journal are also being terminated.
If your paper was published in SPE Journal or an SPE magazine, SPE cannot return rights, and you may not submit your paper to another publication (including SPE publications). You may request permission to include the paper in an academic thesis or dissertation.
To request this permission or to return rights on your conference paper, locate the paper in OnePetro and follow the “Get Permission” link. Be sure to mention that you are the author of the original work in the notes. No fees apply.
SPE can grant permission to reproduce tables or figures provided that these elements are original to the paper. SPE cannot grant permission for material the author republished from another source. You will need to contact the original source for permission.
Each table or figure used in another publication should reference the source work in the references. For tables and figures from an SPE conference proceeding, journal paper, or book, locate the work in OnePetro and follow the “Get Permission” link. For material from SPE magazines send an email request to permissions@spe.org.
A fee will be charged in most cases unless you are the original author of the work.
Authors or their employer may distribute up to 50 printed copies of their SPE paper for educational or professional activities without notification to SPE. Please note, “employer” refers to the authors’ employer at the time the paper was written. This permission can be used multiple times (such as to distribute copies from an employer’s trade show booth or for use in a training course that the author is conducting).
If more than 50 copies are desired, locate the paper in OnePetro and follow the “Get Permission” link.
Requests from third parties to distribute copies for training courses or as papers in a collection may be granted upon payment of a fee. To request permission, locate the paper in OnePetro and follow the “Get Permission” link.
Storage or distribution of SPE copyrighted material by any individual or organization on a generally accessible internet site is not allowed. SPE does not support the creation of databases or storage locations for SPE papers by non-SPE entities.
- Authors or their employers may place a PDF of papers they have written on a company intranet site (internal access only). Papers may not be posted on any type of generally accessible internet site.
- SPE papers downloaded from OnePetro can be posted to limited access workspaces to be shared among project teams or a joint industry project if the number of people with access to the site does not exceed 50 and the papers are posted for the duration of the project only.
- For professors: University subscriptions to OnePetro are unlimited, so students may download copies of the papers for personal use. Your course materials site should include links to OnePetro for any SPE papers that are required reading. By having the students retrieve the papers themselves, you help them learn how to use this valuable resource and their downloads are counted to indicate the value of the work.
SPE will consider requests for use on a customer extranet or other limited access site on a case-by-case basis, and fees may apply. To request additional permission, contact permissions@spe.org.
SPE can only grant permission to use content that is copyrighted by SPE. When in doubt, check the copyright line and contact the society or organization listed for permission. For jointly sponsored meetings in which the copyright line lists the conference name, contact permissions@spe.org to request the correct copyright holder.
- Open access papers (copyright line will say “Copyright, The Authors”) have a CC-BY license and do not require formal permission to reuse but should be properly attributed in your new work. Consult the CC-BY 4.0 license for more information.
- If the paper was written by US government employees in the course of their work, or was funded by the US government (as specified in the applicable contract), it is not subject to copyright. As such, reuse of material in the document does not require approval from the rightsholder.
- If the paper specifies Crown Copyright (typically, this would only be papers written by employees of the UK, Canadian, Australian, or New Zealand governments, and NOT work funded by those governments), copyright is held by the applicable government. To request reuse of material from these papers you must contact the appropriate government copyright organization to request permission.
- You may make up to five photocopies of a single article, or up to 15 pages from a book, to share with colleagues for one-time use. This cannot be used repeatedly to copy longer works in their entirety.
- You may provide a link from your website to material on SPE.org, OnePetro.org, JPT Online.org, energy4me.org, or any other SPE website as long as it is in a manner that does NOT imply SPE endorsement and does NOT include an SPE logo.
- Without SPE permission, you may post or publish an abstract (summary) of any SPE-copyrighted paper as long as it is less than 300 words, or no more than 10% of the entire paper, and it does not include any figures, graphics, or questions. Proper acknowledgement of SPE and copyright year must be included as well as a link to the original paper on OnePetro using the DOI link.
- SPE copyrighted content may be used in an oral presentation, so long as the original source is mentioned.
SPE Publications Ethics Policy
SPE seeks to uphold the highest ethical standards in its publications. This policy is meant to outline a fair and standardized process for evaluating ethical concerns that are brought to the attention of SPE staff and volunteers working on SPE publications including books, journals, conference papers, the Journal of Petroleum Technology, multimedia content, and other technical publications.
An ethical concern related to an SPE publication may include the following:
- Research integrity issues including plagiarism, authorship, and data manipulation.
- Intentionally presenting false or misleading information.
- Use of private company/institutional intellectual property without permission.
- Other instances that breach SPE’s Professional Code of Conduct.
- SPE staff, editor, or chair receives ethical concern submission and sends to the appropriate publications staff representative. The representative may ask for clarification, if needed, from the author of the content related to the ethical concern. Ethical concerns may be presented anonymously, but identity will need to be revealed to the representative to verify that there is no conflict of interest.
- The staff representative will verify that the publication in question is managed and/or published by SPE and that there is no obvious conflict of interest between the ethical concern submitter and the author(s) of the publication in question.
- If the concern meets the aforementioned criteria, the representative will request a response from the original author(s) of publication. The author(s) will be given reasonable time to craft their response based on the complexity of the case.
- An ethics panel made up of volunteers will be put together by the representative (or the editor-in-chief for SPE Journal concerns). The panel’s makeup is different for each publication type (see chart at the end of this document) and will consist of 2–5 members. The original ethical concern and authors' response will be sent to the ethics panel, and they will be given reasonable time to review the case based on complexity. Any volunteer invited to serve on an ethics panel should recuse themselves if they believe there is a conflict of interest.
- The ethics panel will review the case and decide how to proceed. The options include:
- No ethical violation, no further action is needed.
- Non-ethical issue, ethics panel will give recommendations for how the author(s) should revise their publication. Authors are not required to revise their publication but are strongly encouraged to do so.
- Minor ethical violation, allow original author(s) to revise the publication based on volunteer review. If the authors refuse to make changes, their publication may be withdrawn.
- Major ethical violation, publication is withdrawn. The ethics panel may also recommend if the author(s) should be evaluated by the SPE Conduct Review Committee, but only if they are also an SPE member.
- The ethics panel may request further clarification from either the ethical concern submitter or the original publication authors.
- The final decision is communicated to the ethical concern submitter and the original publication authors. The chosen action is taken. If a major ethical violation is the outcome and the ethics panel recommends that the SPE member(s) involved have a subsequent Code of Conduct review, the Chief Executive Officer will review and decide whether to escalate the case to the SPE Conduct Review Committee.
Conference Paper Policies
SPE meetings have a "No Paper, No Podium" policy. If an abstract is accepted to a conference, the author will be required to submit a manuscript by the deadline date. If a manuscript is not submitted, the paper will be withdrawn from the program and the author will not be allowed to present at the conference. All presented manuscripts will become an official record in SPE's permanent technical paper archive, OnePetro, which is available online.
The failure of SPE conference/symposium authors to have at least one author or designated individual participate in-person at the time of the live presentation to present and/or answer questions will result in the paper being permanently withdrawn from the SPE technical paper archive in OnePetro.
Authors will be allowed to submit abstracts to only one conference at a time. An abstract must be declined by a program committee prior to being submitted to another conference for consideration. In the event it is detected that an abstract has been submitted to more than one conference, all versions/copies of that abstract will be removed from consideration.
Any paper previously presented at an SPE conference and published in OnePetro may not be re-submitted for publication at another SPE conference. The author may present the subject matter at subsequent conferences at the invitation of the program committee, but the paper will not be included in the subsequent conference proceedings.
To best serve attendees, SPE makes its Proceedings available on the first day of the conference. To ensure that these Proceedings provide a quality version of each paper, authors are asked to review their manuscript carefully for errors and get all required company approval(s) prior to uploading a manuscript.
Serious Problems with Your Proceedings Paper after Uploading
If, for legal or other reasons, it is imperative that a paper NOT appear in the Proceedings, the author must contact the SPE Conference Program Lead immediately and provide a detailed explanation of why the paper must be withdrawn. The paper will be pulled, as requested.
Correction Requests
If an author has a correction that needs to be made to a submitted manuscript, the corresponding author should submit the correction information via the Manuscript Correction Request Form (SPE Login required).
- A USD 125 fee will be charged for the processing of the update.
- Please note that revisions submitted through this form will take up to 15 business days to process and update on OnePetro.
- Please note that any corrections will only apply to the version of the manuscript on OnePetro.
The Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE) has adopted a hybrid approach to open access publication with open access and traditional access-controlled articles. This applies to both journal and conference papers. Open access articles are freely available to all readers on OnePetro.org and the author(s) retain copyright of their work. Traditional access-controlled articles will continue to be accepted without processing fees.
Starting with select meetings in 2025, authors submitting to a conference may choose to pay an article publication charge (APC) of US$600.00 for open access. SPE members receive a US$100.00 discount on the APC (US$500.00). Authors from low and lower-middle income economies (Group A and B; based on Research4Life’s classifications) will receive a 50% discount (US$300.00). This cannot be combined with the SPE member discount. Payment is required after acceptance of the abstract and must be received prior to the final manuscript submission deadline for the meeting. Open access publication is not available for previously published SPE conference papers. Open access articles will be published under a Creative Commons license term (CC-BY). In order to make clear the separation between scientific editorial decision-making and economic considerations, the option to publish an article under open access is offered to corresponding authors only after review of the abstract and acceptance of a manuscript for the conference. A payment link will be supplied with the abstract acceptance notification.
Author Responsibilities: SPE cannot advise authors on compliance with any requirements placed on them by their funder or employer regarding open access publication. In all cases, the author must verify that their chosen route to publication is in compliance.
Since copyright holders might have policies against commercial reuse, authors that wish to have their article published via the open access CC-BY license should check to be sure that any material they use in their article that was not created by them may be published under the CC-BY license. SPE cannot advise on these issues, nor undertake negotiations with rights holders on the author's behalf. Also, authors are still bound by SPE’s Publication Policies; the Creative Commons licenses are not an endorsement for duplicate publication.
SPE Journal Policies
SPE does not permit the submission of a manuscript which is based on same data, ideas, methods and conclusions which has either been published or is simultaneously under review by another journal. For manuscripts that are in-review, only the abstract of the paper may be submitted to a preprint server.
Manuscripts previously declined for publication by a peer-reviewed journal may be submitted to SPE Journal if the prior review process has been completed and an official decline decision has been rendered.
Authors should only submit original work that has not been previously published in a refereed journal. Previously published explicitly does not include oral or poster presentations, conference proceedings or student theses/dissertations.
Preliminary, high-level, or synopsized publications in SPE Magazines also do not constitute dual publication if an author submits a manuscript on the same research to SPE Journal.
To initiate a discussion, a comment can be submitted to any paper that has been published in a current SPE peer-reviewed journal within a 1-year timeframe. (This does not apply to papers published in conference proceedings.)
For more information, check out the Journal Discussion page.
Errors introduced by authors or the publication that affect the validity of a published work can be corrected in the form of a published erratum.
Format corrections, such as replacing a low-resolution image, correcting corrupted figure labeling, and similar minor changes not involving scientific content, can be made at the discretion of SPE, without formal notification. Please send all correction requests to peer@spe.org.
All submissions to peer review must meet SPE’s paper length limit requirements.
Technical papers should be no more than 10,000 words, including the abstract, main text, tables, figure captions, and appendices (but not including the title, affiliations, acknowledgments, nomenclature, or references). In addition, a maximum of 20 figures that are sized half-page or smaller (full-page figures will be counted as two figures) will be allowed. This 20-figure maximum includes appendix figures. We encourage authors to run a word count check before submission to avoid processing delays. Papers that exceed the length limit will be returned by SPE staff with a request to shorten the manuscript before the paper will be submitted for peer review. We also encourage authors to use the Supplementary Materials template (available in Author Resources) for additional data, figures, and tables that support the main paper. Supplements submitted with the paper for review will be later published with the accepted paper.
Review Papers do not have a length limit.
The Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE) has adopted a hybrid approach to open access publication with Open Access and traditional access-controlled articles. Traditional access-controlled articles will continue to be accepted without processing fees.
As of 1 January 2022, authors submitting to SPE Journal may choose to pay an article publication charge (APC) of US$2,500.00 for Open Access. SPE members receive a US$500.00 discount on the APC (US$2000.00). Authors from low and lower-middle income economies (Group A and B; based on Research4Life’s classifications) will receive a 50% discount (US$1250.00). This cannot be combined with the SPE member discount. Payment is required after acceptance of the article for publication and must be received prior to online publication. Open Access articles will be published under a Creative Commons license term (CC-BY). In order to make clear the separation between scientific editorial decision-making and economic considerations, the option to publish an article under Open Access is offered to corresponding authors after peer-review and acceptance of an article for publication. If you would like your accepted paper to be Open Access, please contact peer@spe.org for information and payment processing.
Author Responsibilities: SPE cannot advise authors on compliance with any requirements placed on them by their funder or employer regarding open access publication. In all cases, the author must verify that their chosen route to publication is in compliance.
Since copyright holders might have policies against commercial reuse, authors that wish to have their article published via the Open Access CC-BY license should check to be sure that any material they use in their article that was not created by them may be published under the CC-BY license. SPE cannot advise on these issues, nor undertake negotiations with rights holders on the author's behalf. Also, authors are still bound by SPE’s Publication Policies; the Creative Commons licenses are not an endorsement for duplicate publication.
SPE authorship requirements dictate that all individuals listed in an article byline meet the following criteria to be considered an author of the manuscript:
- Each individual must have made a significant intellectual contribution to the theoretical development, system of experimental design, prototype development, and/or the analysis and interpretation of data associated with the work contained in the article.
- Each individual must have contributed to drafting, reviewing, or revising the article for intellectual content.
- Each individual must be available to approve the final version of the article before publication.
As determined by the Executive Editor, any article that has an unusually large number of authors for the type of research presented will require a full contribution list elaborating the nature and percentage of contribution of each author. In addition to the criteria above, use the following questions when compiling this list:
- What distinct and novel ideas did each author contribute to the research presented? Elaborate the specific and distinct details of novel contribution by each author.
- Was the expertise of each author necessary to conduct this research? Be specific.
Only individuals with significant contribution to the novel ideas presented in the article should be considered as an author. Individuals who do not meet all the criteria previously listed, who have made only a minor contribution, or who have shared the same idea as that of multiple other contributors should be included in the Acknowledgments section of the submitted article. Examples of contributions that alone (without other contributions to the article) do not qualify an individual for authorship include, but are not limited to:
- Acquisition of funding
- General supervision of a research group
- General administrative support
- Writing assistance
- Technical editing
- Language editing
- Proofreading
Changes to Authorship for Revised Manuscripts: Before submitting a revised manuscript for further peer review and publication consideration, make sure all contributing authors have been listed in the article byline according to the criteria above. Note the following:
- Omitting an author who contributed to your article or including an author who did not fulfill all the above requirements is considered a breach of publishing ethics and could result in withdrawal of the paper.
- Any request to remove or add an author will be reviewed for adherence to COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics) guidelines.
- No authorship changes will be accepted once a paper is approved for publication, unless there is a legal reason, at which time the Executive Editor will be notified for authorization.
Requests for changes in authorship require:
- Complete listing of author names, affiliations, details of contribution, and contribution percentage.
- Written consent/acknowledgment from any authors that have been removed from the byline during the peer review process.
- Written consent/acknowledgment from the final list of authors that the byline is correct before submitting the revised article to the manuscript system.
Commercialism Policy
SPE recognizes to maintain the integrity, high quality, and unbiased information in all forms of written and oral presentations at any SPE event including, but not limited to, conferences, symposia, workshops, summits, or forums, overt commercialism is prohibited outside of the commercial exhibit areas.
Items deemed to be commercial in nature will not be allowed or disseminated. This includes, but is not limited to, Conference Proceedings, presentations, OnePetro, Journals, Webinars, and promotional material.
Use of the following will be carefully scrutinized during evaluation and presentation and could result in being withdrawn from the program:
- Generic descriptions should replace commercial trade names or trademarked materials
- Company logos allowed on title and closing slide only
- Text which is overtly commercial in tone or intent within paper titles, presentation slides, text, tables, figures, animation, audio, and video is prohibited
Repeated violations of this policy may result in the speaker and/or moderator being barred from participating in future SPE event programs.
"Forward-Looking Statement" Disclaimers
Under current US law, US-based companies may, on occasion, believe that statements in some papers submitted to SPE conferences need to be accompanied by a disclaimer relating to forward-looking statements. While this applies to a small percentage of SPE papers, SPE has developed a preferred format for inclusion of these statements.
Please note that the disclaimer should not include language that would prohibit copying or distribution of the paper without company permission, as those activities are governed by SPE's copyright and permissions policy, not by the company. If the company is so concerned about the nature of the statements that such a prohibition is deemed necessary, then perhaps it should not approve the material for inclusion in a paper submitted to an SPE conference.
Strongly Preferred Location for Inclusion of Disclaimer
Add a section at the end of the paper, after the text of the paper, but prior to Acknowledgements or References that is titled Disclaimer. Then include the required statements (typically no more than 2-3 sentences).
Acceptable Alternate Location
The top portion of an SPE paper has the logo, paper number, paper title, authors, copyright statement, and provenance blurb (in smaller-sized type). This is followed by a heavy line. The paper begins below this line, typically with the title Abstract.
If a company believes that the disclaimer needs to be at the beginning of the paper, rather than the end, it is acceptable to put it in small type (same size as provenance blurb) between the line and the title Abstract.
Inclusion of Disclaimer in Conference Presentation
A brief statement of the disclaimer as part of the presentation or inclusion of a single slide with the appropriate disclaimer language without extensive discussion is considered adequate.